A couple more thoughts on the topic, even though it probably belongs in another thread.
I think Dragic could have had a fantastic career. He was an absolute terror in the open court and a good shooter. If he'd tried to be a threat off the ball he would have been one of the most well rounded offense guards in the NBA. I think he and Bledsoe were a really good pairing, they did a good job of covering for each others short comings and, especially on the break, accentuating strengths. That pairing was, by far, the biggest strength on the roster in 2013-14. When they played together we had a winning percentage that put us on pace for like 54-55 wins, and that was with a really sketchy roster around them.
McD shouldn't have screwed with that part of the formula. While I see his logic in signing IT; it allowed us to keep a face paced, free wheeling attack at all times and IT was signed at an incredible bargain. At the same time... players are not automatons (this is McD's biggest fault, I think he's a good at seeing talent but he disregards that he's dealing with fragile egos and not a fantasy team or video game).
But, if Dragic felt like the relationship was beyond repair, I wish he would have said so, instead of demanding they move Thomas and then changing his mind after they'd signed off on moving Thomas.
IMO, Dragic is a player who does like to win, but he only tries if he is playing on his terms. Bledsoe on the other hand does not seem too worried about his touches or role in the offense, he really wants to win but rapidly quits trying if he deems it too steep a hill to climb.