Suns trade for Center Mark Williams

Raindog

I didn't come here to be liked!
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Posts
5,754
Reaction score
7,431
Ok so you are right it’s not a massive or big upgrade. We mildly upgraded center. We are not better than trash.

Until something is done with his contract he’s here and that means he’s part of our future because a lot of what we can do is based on him and his contract. He’s here like it or not.

Oh I’m short sighted oh ok not the front office but me huh.

This is a 30 win team wow
Finito (who I don't often agree with) is right here. The Suns may be able to piece together what is technically a "team" from the various parts they now have. But by no means, is it going to be a "good team"... nor does in any way, the near future look very promising at putting together for that, with almost no draft capital or other remotely valuable assets on hand.

At this point, the only hope the Suns have at escaping NBA purgatory in the next few (or several) years is to somehow attract a Giannis/Jokic level free agent if/when one ever becomes available, OR just luck out like crazy with most of the few draft picks we actually still do own for the next several years.

Either of those are a pretty long shot to pin your hopes on. Frittering away whatever even late draft picks we own isn't likely to help much, especially if what we give them away for ends up not working out either. I am not saying that's a certainty with this particular trade, but it does need to be taken into consideration given that we have almost no margin for error.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
47,350
Reaction score
18,221
Location
Round Rock, TX
Again you are only looking at the deal in isolation.

It is stupid not so much because 2 late firsts for Williams is a bad price - it's because we already had Nick Richards as a competent backup, and really only Ryan Dunn as a forward.

We need forwards and those 2 firsts were our best chance of getting them.
Maybe, maybe not. You're hitching your horse to two picks at the end of the first round. If you value late draft picks, fine, but you are really going all-in on this because it just happens to be a good reason to complain at the moment.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
47,350
Reaction score
18,221
Location
Round Rock, TX
Finito (who I don't often agree with) is right here. The Suns may be able to piece together what is technically a "team" from the various parts they now have. But by no means, is it going to be a "good team"... nor does in any way, the near future look very promising at putting together for that, with almost no draft capital or other remotely valuable assets on hand.

At this point, the only hope the Suns have at escaping NBA purgatory in the next few (or several) years is to somehow attract a Giannis/Jokic level free agent if/when one ever becomes available, OR just luck out like crazy with most of the few draft picks we actually still do own for the next several years.

Either of those are a pretty long shot to pin your hopes on. Frittering away whatever even late draft picks we own isn't likely to help much, especially if what we give them away for ends up not working out either. I am not saying that's a certainty with this particular trade, but it does need to be taken into consideration given that we have almost no margin for error.
We aren't in purgatory yet. Many here think that the KD trade was addition by subtraction. But there are a few, including yourself, that are taking a sky is falling approach, that honestly will always be your outlook no matter what the Suns do.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
13,800
Reaction score
11,715
How are we going to move Beal or Grayson without draft comp to dump some salary and also get under the 2nd apron and somehow get a useful PF in the deals?

If we can't dump salary forget any free agents beyond the min.

It might have been possible with those 2 week firsts, certainly more possible than the bunch of seconds we have.

There is one answer to all our problems - trade Booker, I just don't think they are willing to do it.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,596
Reaction score
5,171
Location
Harrisburg, PA
Again you are only looking at the deal in isolation.

It is stupid not so much because 2 late firsts for Williams is a bad price - it's because we already had Nick Richards as a competent backup, and really only Ryan Dunn as a forward.

We need forwards and those 2 firsts were our best chance of getting them.

Williams is significantly better than Richards. This is an upgrade.

Additionally, I'd argue that you are the one looking at the deal in isolation. They have time to add some forwards and a point guard or two. Season is not starting tomorrow.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
13,800
Reaction score
11,715
Williams is significantly better than Richards. This is an upgrade.

Additionally, I'd argue that you are the one looking at the deal in isolation. They have time to add some forwards and a point guard or two. Season is not starting tomorrow.
Not saying he isn't an upgrade - but how big an upgrade? We are talking about 15 minutes a game - and the difference between the 2. That isn't that big a deal.
 

BirdGangThing

Murd Watcher
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
21,135
Reaction score
27,345
Location
Arcadia
it's not that im upset about this but come on man - this could only happen to ish - any other gm would've set the williams deal in place and pushed it thru once we were at the podium because you never know - and because you never show your cards - but the impulsivenish reared it's immature head once again

again tho - i'm not big mad - it's more funny to me because ish showing his ass is becoming less and less upsetting - it's not as shocking - normalized lol and what are you gonna do? care? forgetaboutit - laugh it off - don't listen to what your wife says some emotions are better left suppressed
 
Last edited:

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
13,800
Reaction score
11,715
Williams is significantly better than Richards. This is an upgrade.

Additionally, I'd argue that you are the one looking at the deal in isolation. They have time to add some forwards and a point guard or two. Season is not starting tomorrow.
How - minimum salary players? How often do they make a meaningful contribution?

You really believe you can get anything other than garbage back for Beal? Don't see help there.

Grayson or Royce aren't going to excite anyone. Maybe you can dump Grayson for a team looking for shooting, but I don't expect a very good player in return.

The only way we can balance the roster out is to trade Booker.
 

Raindog

I didn't come here to be liked!
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Posts
5,754
Reaction score
7,431
We aren't in purgatory yet. Many here think that the KD trade was addition by subtraction. But there are a few, including yourself, that are taking a sky is falling approach, that honestly will always be your outlook no matter what the Suns do.
Wrong, dude. I was actually a supporter of the Durant trade, and even Beal to some extent, long after others were jumping off that bandwagon. And the same for supporting Ishbia. I was still pro-Ish well after a lot of you started hammering him.

But this offseason so far has most definitely not redeemed my faith in that. The transactions they have made so far should not inspire confidence that the Suns are in any way going to be improved next season.

We'll see what happens the rest of the summer, but adding a big time project, an injured more than he plays guy, and the 24 year old version of Bradley Beal (Green), who is redundant with Booker, doesn't correlate to anything to be inspired over.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,309
Reaction score
14,096
How are we going to move Beal or Grayson without draft comp to dump some salary and also get under the 2nd apron and somehow get a useful PF in the deals?

If we can't dump salary forget any free agents beyond the min.

It might have been possible with those 2 week firsts, certainly more possible than the bunch of seconds we have.

There is one answer to all our problems - trade Booker, I just don't think they are willing to do it.

Right!

The reason Orlando gave up so much is because they had to incentivize Memphis to take the KCP contract.

If you want to move Beal you have to make it worth it for a team. Sending 29 and that future 1 and some second rounders with Beal makes it worth it.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,309
Reaction score
14,096
We aren't in purgatory yet. Many here think that the KD trade was addition by subtraction. But there are a few, including yourself, that are taking a sky is falling approach, that honestly will always be your outlook no matter what the Suns do.

The sky isn’t falling it already fell.

We have a ton of money tied up in crap and we have no assets. Lol dude this team is going to suck
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
47,350
Reaction score
18,221
Location
Round Rock, TX
The sky isn’t falling it already fell.

We have a ton of money tied up in crap and we have no assets. Lol dude this team is going to suck
And yet, nobody knew we'd get who we got at #10 and nobody knew we were trading for another center. To think that we are in a vacuum and every move is THE move is crazy, especially on June 26th. We're 100% not done yet, so we have no idea what this team will look like come September 1st, heck we might not even know until October 1st.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,596
Reaction score
5,171
Location
Harrisburg, PA
How - minimum salary players? How often do they make a meaningful contribution?

You really believe you can get anything other than garbage back for Beal? Don't see help there.

Grayson or Royce aren't going to excite anyone. Maybe you can dump Grayson for a team looking for shooting, but I don't expect a very good player in return.

The only way we can balance the roster out is to trade Booker.

They have Grayson or O'Neal to trade. They have Martin and Richards to either trade or cut to get under the second apron, which frees up a bit of an exception. They have a few second-round picks to include in some of those trades. Let's chill out and see what else they add. They need one PF, one point guard, and bring back Gillespie and maybe Bol (PF and a forward). It's not like they have 10 shooting guards and five centers on the roster and nothing else.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
20,712
Reaction score
16,938
Location
Tempe, AZ
I know it's massive overkill, but I'd like to keep Nick Richards until the Suns get the Suns the center position figured out.

Although, not related, keeping Cody Martin would help solidify the Suns at forward.

I'd prefer we bring back Plumlee. I think he has more to offer in huddles and practice than Richards. Ultimately either would see very limited minutes and the gap between what they might produce is negligible.
 

leclerc

The smooth operator
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Posts
2,823
Reaction score
1,683
Location
Norway
Do we have anything resembling a PF? Oso? Bol is too skinny and the rest are seriously undersized.

Right now what would the rotation be?

Williams/Maluach
Brooks (yuck)/Oso
Dunn/Martin
Booker/Beal
Green/Gillespie
 

BirdGangThing

Murd Watcher
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
21,135
Reaction score
27,345
Location
Arcadia
Do we have anything resembling a PF? Oso? Bol is too skinny and the rest are seriously undersized.

Right now what would the rotation be?

Williams/Maluach
Brooks (yuck)/Oso
Dunn/Martin
Booker/Beal
Green/Gillespie

closest thing we have to a pf is brooks and oneale - both 6'6" - neither are known for rebounds which a true pf needs to do

ive been paying attention to rebounds in this new tough and gun league - power forwards are faster than centers so they can wait around for a rebound - still get up and down

we don't have anything that resembles any of that
 

taz02

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 8, 2007
Posts
1,001
Reaction score
535
We can get by with smaller PF's if we have two 7ft giants knocking people around.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
753,970
Posts
5,742,627
Members
6,370
Latest member
HoustonBam
Top