angel_ofthe_south
Newbie
Like a number of people, I don't find Booker so great, and I readily acknowledge that he is overpaid; but people on my previous Suns forum noted that I am good at seeing from more than one perspective. So, here is why I nevertheless don't really want to trade Booker, and understand Mat Ishbia's attitude toward him.
As far as I know, there are arguably only two "great" players in the Phoenix Suns franchise's entire history who played anything close to their entire career in Phoenix: Dick van Arsdale, and Kevin Johnson. Every single other important, popular, or statistically great Phoenix Sun I can think of came from somewhere else or was eventually traded: Paul Westphal; Charlie Scott; Connie Hawkins; Jeff Hornacek; Dan Majerle; Charles Barkley; Cliff Robinson; Jason Kidd; Steve Nash; Amare Stoudemire; Shawn Marion; Chris Paul; Kevin Durant. Therefore, Devin Booker is being offered the chance to go down in Suns history as one of the very, very few great Suns players who came and stayed without their Suns career being interrupted. To be one of the faces on the Suns' Mount Rushmore. That's probably attractive to him, because he seems quite amenable to staying.
I just wish he weren't paid so much for it. It's part of why I disrespect the NBA: no star player can be kept without tying up the payroll for him. The very few star players in their prime who will take less money to play for a team, such as Danny Manning, played decades ago. It doesn't happen now, probably because money is more a part of the NBA culture than it used to be.
*Will anyone point out that neither Dick van Arsdale nor Kevin Johnson started their careers with the Suns? DvD played for the Knicks for three years before the Suns took him in their expansion draft; and Kevin Johnson briefly played for the Cavaliers as a rookie before the Suns traded for him. Please don't bother. I ignore it, why don't you? Those two are the closest we have...except for Devin Booker.
As far as I know, there are arguably only two "great" players in the Phoenix Suns franchise's entire history who played anything close to their entire career in Phoenix: Dick van Arsdale, and Kevin Johnson. Every single other important, popular, or statistically great Phoenix Sun I can think of came from somewhere else or was eventually traded: Paul Westphal; Charlie Scott; Connie Hawkins; Jeff Hornacek; Dan Majerle; Charles Barkley; Cliff Robinson; Jason Kidd; Steve Nash; Amare Stoudemire; Shawn Marion; Chris Paul; Kevin Durant. Therefore, Devin Booker is being offered the chance to go down in Suns history as one of the very, very few great Suns players who came and stayed without their Suns career being interrupted. To be one of the faces on the Suns' Mount Rushmore. That's probably attractive to him, because he seems quite amenable to staying.
I just wish he weren't paid so much for it. It's part of why I disrespect the NBA: no star player can be kept without tying up the payroll for him. The very few star players in their prime who will take less money to play for a team, such as Danny Manning, played decades ago. It doesn't happen now, probably because money is more a part of the NBA culture than it used to be.
*Will anyone point out that neither Dick van Arsdale nor Kevin Johnson started their careers with the Suns? DvD played for the Knicks for three years before the Suns took him in their expansion draft; and Kevin Johnson briefly played for the Cavaliers as a rookie before the Suns traded for him. Please don't bother. I ignore it, why don't you? Those two are the closest we have...except for Devin Booker.