Johnson:
G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% eFG% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
57 22 26.8 3.8 9.2 .413 1.6 4.6 .346 2.2 4.7 .477 .498 1.7 2.2 .748 0.6 2.4 3.0 2.9 0.9 0.5 1.4 1.7 10.9
270 68 26.8 4.0 9.2 .433 1.3 3.5 .364 2.7 5.6 .477 .504 1.8 2.3 .771 0.6 2.8 3.3 2.5 0.9 0.5 1.2 2.0 11.0
PER last year of 12.4, and Career PER of 13.8.
Rubio:
G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% 2P 2PA 2P% eFG% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
68 67 27.9 4.3 10.7 .404 1.2 3.7 .311 3.2 7.0 .454 .458 2.9 3.4 .855 0.5 3.1 3.6 6.1 1.3 0.1 2.6 2.6 12.7
498 477 30.9 3.6 9.2 .388 0.8 2.6 .322 2.7 6.6 .413 .433 3.1 3.7 .838 0.7 3.5 4.2 7.7 1.9 0.1 2.7 2.6 11.1
Per last year of 14.0, and career PER of 15.8.
Johnson is a better shooter from the field in terms of percentages, but Rubio is by far the better passer and more efficient player. That being said, the numbers bear out my perception: Johnson is too inefficient and too poor of a passer to play the point, while Rubio is not good enough of a shooter to play the point next to Booker.