xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
And people said I was crazyxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
@Chopper0080 is crazyAnd people said I was crazy
Id actually want more.Almost guaranteed the Pats will trade #3 if that's the Broncos offer.
WHICH IS IT! ONE OR THE OTHER DUMMIExc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
The irony is thick with this one. Does Payton understand he's only in charge, because the previous guy in charge mortgaged the future for a QB?xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
This is the exact scenario the Cardinals want. Negotiation through the media. If I'm Monti, I'm not moving down to 11th for just three picks. I want more.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Give me #12, Surtain, Sutton, and next years 1st.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Wow. I didn't know there was a real Jimmy Dean! LMAO!! Learn something new every day!AI of Jimmy Dean who sang Big Bad John
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Sutton's value is probably a day three pick. Much better players have gone for peanuts.Give me #12, Surtain, Sutton, and next years 1st.
I will take that deal all day long. We have more than enough capital to move back up from 12..and if we are adding 2 solid NFL Vets then we need 3rd round picks even less.
Even if we had to trade #12, and all 3 of our 3rd round picks....thats over 2000 points on the chart, which is more than the #4 pick anyway....so I would be extremely confident we could make a deal with a team at 5, 6, 7 or 8 to make sure we still land one of the top WRs.
So we would come out of the draft with Surtain, Sutton, and Odunze/Nabers instead of 3 3rd round rookies...and still have Denver's #1 pick next year. I think Denver is going to suck...even more so getting rid of Surtain and Sutton and starting a rookie QB....so I would take that deal 10/10 times.
Wow! That would be better than the Vikings offer. Getting an all pro at a premium position would be awesome.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Being honest, I was sure that the Texans pick would be Top Five, this year. I amaze myself with how little I know.Give me #12, Surtain, Sutton, and next years 1st.
I will take that deal all day long. We have more than enough capital to move back up from 12..and if we are adding 2 solid NFL Vets then we need 3rd round picks even less.
Even if we had to trade #12, and all 3 of our 3rd round picks....thats over 2000 points on the chart, which is more than the #4 pick anyway....so I would be extremely confident we could make a deal with a team at 5, 6, 7 or 8 to make sure we still land one of the top WRs.
So we would come out of the draft with Surtain, Sutton, and Odunze/Nabers instead of 3 3rd round rookies...and still have Denver's #1 pick next year. I think Denver is going to suck...even more so getting rid of Surtain and Sutton and starting a rookie QB....so I would take that deal 10/10 times.
Well, the room is a crowded one.Being honest, I was sure that the Texans pick would be Top Five, this year. I amaze myself with how little I know.