Bradford is a guy who has some tools, and has a relatively quick mind. But he isn't a franchise QB that can get it done provided some extreme favoring circumstances. His arm is okay. It's serviceable. His athleticism is serviceable.
I think they signed him because they looked around and said... what the hell are we going to get that is better? Chase Daniels is the only veteran guy on my radar that I would consider.
For that 'security' they paid a helluva price. Like twice or more what he is 'worth'.... and his injury prone history means they are taking a big risk. In my mind, and I could be wrong, he plays like an 8 million a year QB, that could become 12, but injury history could push to 5. So 8-9 overall is where I put him.
I will never forget that over a 15 game stretch (over 2 seasons) John Skelton greatly outpeformed him. Check the stats. Yes the Rams were disadvantaged at skilled offensive positions comparatively, but still it wasn't even close.
So yeah, it was bad, and Bradford is lucky to get the money he has in his career, but the Rams really don't have much of an alternative.
Though.... Manning might go there, and that's interesting. Though I think he fails if he goes there barring some sort of offensive awakening by whatever almost impossible thing. I don't think the Rams should get him to be their starter, but if he's there and they can get more weapons, better line, and a better offensive system... you never know. It's a hail mary for the L.A. market. Sometimes people go for the hail mary.
It will be interesting to see him not limited by Kelly's offense. Kelly's offense was partially run by Bradford, but, Bradford is a better suited for a different offense.