Dortch has been tendered…

[kerouac9]

That squad would struggle in the SEC @kerouac9

MAC-quality WR room right now.

 

[PlayerHater]

Good now we don't need to waste a pick on MHJ.

 

[GatorAZ]

More broken ankles next season for opposing defenses.

 

[Stout]

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

Surely we won't keep Pascal?

 

[Stout]

The Human Dortch!!!!

He puts the D in the Dortch-ure chamber!

 

[Garthshort]

Surely we won't keep Pascal?

I see your point. But we signed him, I believe, for his ST play. And ST's are important. So we might keep him.

 

[PACardsFan]

I see your point. But we signed him, I believe, for his ST play. And ST's are important. So we might keep him.

In the Cardinals offense, it’s necessary that WR’s can block. Pascal is a very good ST player & the guy can block.

 

[Mulli]

He puts the D in the Dortch-ure chamber!

Don't let the Dortch hit you on the way out!

 

[Stout]

In the Cardinals offense, it’s necessary that WR’s can block. Pascal is a very good ST player & the guy can block.

Pascal is a nothing burger. He gave us nothing last year. He'll give us nothing next year. What good is a receiver who can't catch passes? Dead giveaway that we aren't throwing, then, if our "run-blocking only WR" is in the game. He needs to go.

 

[Garthshort]

Why do you keep ignoring ST play?

 

[RON_IN_OC]

MAC-quality WR room right now.

Meh
Athletes
Congregation

 

[CardNots]

Why do you keep ignoring ST play?

Simple, its about the negative narrative…

 

[kerouac9]

Meh
Athletes
Congregation

OOOF. 4/10.

 

[Stout]

Why do you keep ignoring ST play?

Because it should be irrelevant for a player like Pascal. You want your ST players younger and cheaper. Like, bottom of the roster and crazy to stay on the roster cheap.

 

[Stout]

Simple, its about the negative narrative…

No, yours is a negative narrative. I just gave you the reason. I accept your apology

 

[CardNots]

Because it should be irrelevant for a player like Pascal. You want your ST players younger and cheaper. Like, bottom of the roster and crazy to stay on the roster cheap.

I forgot about his contract cost, I apologize sincerely.

Geez, I should know better but yet again, I have you

 

[Krangodnzr]

Because it should be irrelevant for a player like Pascal. You want your ST players younger and cheaper. Like, bottom of the roster and crazy to stay on the roster cheap.

I was on board with Pascal when I thought he might get you 40 catches like he has previously.

Right now he's a prime cut candidate since a motivated UDFA can essentially fill his job.

 

[oaken1]

I was on board with Pascal when I thought he might get you 40 catches like he has previously.

Right now he's a prime cut candidate since a motivated UDFA can essentially fill his job.

Not to mention it's a great draft to double dip wr...and if we have a couple rookies it makes no sense to waste snaps on an unproductive vet

 

[kerouac9]

I was on board with Pascal when I thought he might get you 40 catches like he has previously.

Right now he's a prime cut candidate since a motivated UDFA can essentially fill his job.

I disagree he's a prime cut candidate (what are you going to do with the money anyway?), but he definitely suxxxxx as a pass catcher.

 

[Krangodnzr]

I disagree he's a prime cut candidate (what are you going to do with the money anyway?), but he definitely suxxxxx as a pass catcher.

You can save almost $2 million cutting him. Almost a guarantee he's gone if there is more than one new receiver added.

 

[bankybruce]

You can save almost $2 million cutting him. Almost a guarantee he's gone if there is more than one new receiver added.

Since the cap only counts thr top 51 contracts, Pascal cap hit is $2.64 million. When all is said and done, #51 will count about $1.1 million against the cap, so you're only saving about $1.54 cap money, plus $750k in dead money. Cutting him only about $790k in cap space.

I'm surprised we have 63 players under contract.

 

[kerouac9]

You can save almost $2 million cutting him. Almost a guarantee he's gone if there is more than one new receiver added.

So? What are we going to do with that money this year with no one to re-sign and a meager FA market? We have plenty of cap space.

 

[Cheesebeef]

Why do you keep ignoring ST play?

Is there ANY tangible evidence to support that he’s a good ST player? Or is that just what people say about a guy who has absolutely zero measurable stats to justify his existence on the roster?

 

[bankybruce]

Is there ANY tangible evidence to support that he’s a good ST player? Or is that just what people say about a guy who has absolutely zero measurable stats to justify his existence on the roster?

Not saying this is the case, but sometimes guys like this exist purely for practice and scout team. Some zero measurable guys have a role. No clue about him though.

 

[Cheesebeef]

Not saying this is the case, but sometimes guys like this exist purely for practice and scout team. Some zero measurable guys have a role. No clue about him though.

I def believe there are guys like that on teams, but that doesn’t strike at the heart of the argument that he’s a good STer, either.