AustrianCardFan
Veteran
I just looked it up: First one 46, second one 48
Moody missed from 48...
Moody missed from 48...
Dudes on the sidelines making dumb decisions to hurt their team giving athletes a chance to not execute.Dudes on the sidelines getting blamed when the athletes don’t execute.
Then he will be crucified in turn, as is proper.Some of us, and probably most of us, would have made the decision to kick FG’s in the Lions game yesterday. But, in today’s NFL, analytics have taken over. We all need to understand that if the Cardinals are ever in a similar situation that Campbell found himself in, that JG will no doubt also nix the FG attempt. Just something we need to come to grips with.
Dudes on the sidelines making dumb decisions to hurt their team giving athletes a chance to not execute.
Agree. When it works, you look like a genius. And when it doesn’t, the loss is agonizing & the coach looks the fool.Then he will be crucified in turn, as is proper.
Doesn't make it any dumber of a decision.The opportunity was there to execute. Did you see the play?
You go up 3 scores at that point in the game and it is a freaking mountain to climb for the opposing team to have a chance. You go for it and miss, and the opposing team can (and did) make it a one-score game fairly quickly. There is no world where he made the right decision. None.on Campbell passing on two FGs-
i am curious how much the Lions inability to stop SF in the 2nd half played into that
as the HC, if you know that your D is unlikely to get two more stops: dont you have to go for it to both possess the ball more, and, score a TD?
Going for it was the right decision both times.
Agree. Analytics have turned the game to crap. All these head coaches hide behind these charts and statistics, instead of playing fundamental football. That way, if something doesn't work out they can just say "hey, the analytics said to go for it", it just didn't work out.You go up 3 scores at that point in the game and it is a freaking mountain to climb for the opposing team to have a chance. You go for it and miss, and the opposing team can (and did) make it a one-score game fairly quickly. There is no world where he made the right decision. None.
the world where Josh Reynolds catches the football, and they end up scoring a TD is one of those worldsThere is no world where he made the right decision. None.
The thing about analytics though is that the tables will rebalance with more failures. It's possible (maybe even likely) that the stats were tilted because sample sizes were small and the attempts were made in mainly high-probability situations.Agree. Analytics have turned the game to crap. All these head coaches hide behind these charts and statistics, instead of playing fundamental football. That way, if something doesn't work out they can just say "hey, the analytics said to go for it", it just didn't work out.
All these two point conversions, going for it on 4th. These coaches think they are playing a game of Madden, not real football.
Exactly. The Lions should have been playing a home game versus the Niners except Dan Campbell went for 2 versus the Cowboys in the next to last game of the season. They got it the first time, then a very late penalty nullified the play, so they trailed 19-20 again. Just kick a PAT and the game is tied and going into OT, but instead he went for 2 a second time and they did not get it - but there was a penalty on the Cowboys. How about kicking the PAT now? Nope. He went for it a third time and they did not get it and they lost.Agree. Analytics have turned the game to crap. All these head coaches hide behind these charts and statistics, instead of playing fundamental football. That way, if something doesn't work out they can just say "hey, the analytics said to go for it", it just didn't work out.
All these two point conversions, going for it on 4th. These coaches think they are playing a game of Madden, not real football.
They weren’t guaranteed, though. Pretty sure their kicker has struggled after 40+ yards all season.I think the reason the Lions were even in the position they were in this season is because they’ve been aggressive all season. It’s kind of been their DNA all season, and maybe they aren’t in the NFC championship without it.
That being said… if I was a Lions fan I would have preferred to take guaranteed points when they are there with a chance to go to the Super Bowl.
You're going to stubbornly defend the decision; I'm not going to be swayed. The last thing I'll say to you is what someone on the radio said today (can't remember which pundit): Those are the right risks to take EARLY in the game, not in crunch time like that.the world where Josh Reynolds catches the football, and they end up scoring a TD is one of those worlds
40-49, Badgely (last three years) is 82%
50+ 66%
so its not like either of those FGs were automatic points either
Hard to argue that point.You're going to stubbornly defend the decision; I'm not going to be swayed. The last thing I'll say to you is what someone on the radio said today (can't remember which pundit): Those are the right risks to take EARLY in the game, not in crunch time like that.
Is that a "good" pundit? Or someone is no longer employed because they are a dope?You're going to stubbornly defend the decision; I'm not going to be swayed. The last thing I'll say to you is what someone on the radio said today (can't remember which pundit): Those are the right risks to take EARLY in the game, not in crunch time like that.
Get to just sit back and absorb the schadenfreude as people suffer from their teams playoff mistakes.I fully admit to being glad that the Cardinals are so bad so I wouldn't have to stress out about "meaningful" games.
Small sample size.Get to just sit back and absorb the schadenfreude as people suffer from their teams playoff mistakes.
And proudly state, "holy crap. We have had some bad coaches over the years and none of them have EVER screwed up like that in the playoffs" ....some will argue semantics. But the statement remains true.
SemanticsSmall sample size.![]()