At a 15 million ask, I wouldn't want to pay a good chunk to an agent. Likely his last big payday. On the other hand a good agent gets his commission and more from a agent negotiated contract versus DIY.MHJ is also self-repped, per spotrac.
At a 15 million ask, I wouldn't want to pay a good chunk to an agent. Likely his last big payday. On the other hand a good agent gets his commission and more from a agent negotiated contract versus DIY.MHJ is also self-repped, per spotrac.
You wouldn’t make him the lowest-paid starting QB in the league? Never ever?I'd never ever pay Brissett that much.
Agent commissions in the NFL are capped at like 3%.At a 15 million ask, I wouldn't want to pay a good chunk to an agent. Likely his last big payday. On the other hand a good agent gets his commission and more from a agent negotiated contract versus DIY.
I'm with Russ - I'd never name him a starter to begin with and definitely wouldn't pay him starter money.You wouldn’t make him the lowest-paid starting QB in the league? Never ever?
It’s not your money; what’s your concern?
Beck has no traits that Brissett doesn’t equal or exceed.
This is the tax we pay for keeping Monti. Brissett is the starter and better than anyone else we have by a country mile.I'm with Russ - I'd never name him a starter to begin with and definitely wouldn't pay him starter money.
He's not a starter - her just isn't
Why would you pay him double what Flacco signed for? Double Mariota?
There are plenty of no upside, mediocre vets making less than what he's currently making - let alone what he's asking for
It really doesn't look great when you allow yourself to get leveraged by the Jacoby Brissetts of the world - but that is the position they created for themselves
Yeah - I see your POV for sureThis is the tax we pay for keeping Monti. Brissett is the starter and better than anyone else we have by a country mile.
I’m not sure why paying him as literally the worst veteran starter in the league is somehow unacceptable.
Brissett is just too slow in a dual threat kind of league, and didn't finish. So, no.You wouldn’t make him the lowest-paid starting QB in the league? Never ever?
It’s not your money; what’s your concern?
Beck has no traits that Brissett doesn’t equal or exceed.
Because we suck? Because Monti is bad. Is Jacoby more than 75% worse than Malik Willis? I don’t think so.Yeah - I see your POV for sure
I think the bigger issue is why is he running as a starter?
He's a fully replaceable player - I'd rate him as replaceable even as a backup
It's a position they mismanaged themselves into for sure
Jacoby had more first down rushes than James Conner and Trey Benson combined last season.Brissett is just too slow in a dual threat kind of league, and didn't finish. So, no.
I don't think much of Willis, but he re-established himself as a young prospect that did well enough in relief that teams will take a risk on him as a starter - those guys have always been paid on the hope they work out, but seldom doBecause we suck? Because Monti is bad. Is Jacoby more than 75% worse than Malik Willis? I don’t think so.
He’s got us over a barrel for sure.
Brissett is a veteran. His contract will be guaranteed when the season starts. When he signed his contract, he had $8M in guarantees.Brissett needs to get paid guaranteed money similar to comparable quarterbacks.
I understand Minshew is guaranteed more money.
Brissett is a veteran. His contract will be guaranteed when the season starts. When he signed his contract, he had $8M in guarantees.
They had 61 combined rushes. Jacoby had 38.They hardly played.
Jacoby has a $4.9 million salary that will be guaranteed if he’s on the roster week 1.I'm not as familiar with NFL salaries as I am NBA salaries.
However, I read only $1.5 million of Brissett's salary is presently guaranteed. Whereas, I understand Minshew is already guaranteed a one-year deal worth $5.75 million.
Jacoby has a $4.9 million salary that will be guaranteed if he’s on the roster week 1.
Wasn’t worth the time nor the comparison.They had 61 combined rushes. Jacoby had 38.
You could have checked these stats yourself.
That's funny. You made a statement, was proven wrong and instead of acknowledging it, you poo poo it away. Dude, I haven't been here long compared to most but, I have noticed that posts get acknowledged more or less due to the posters honesty.Wasn’t worth the time nor the comparison.
No. It’s unimportant. The RBs barely played and it’s an anomaly that says nothing about JB’s worth . It’s such a small sample size it matters not.That's funny. You made a statement, was proven wrong and instead of acknowledging it, you poo poo it away. Dude, I haven't been here long compared to most but, I have noticed that posts get acknowledged more or less due to the posters honesty.
I was honest once and got banned...that's not hypocritical, just a different story......LOLOLOL
Ooooh, that may be why...They hardly played.
Hence the reason for the statement. It wasn’t meant to be a counter to the stats, it was the reason.Ooooh, that may be why...![]()
I think the point is, JB had more rushing 1st downs...yes, it may be meaningless but it's a fact. That's all that was being pointed out.No. It’s unimportant. The RBs barely played and it’s an anomaly that says nothing about JB’s worth . It’s such a small sample size it matters not.
It is certainly correct but it’s meaningless.
Correct…which is why I wasn’t disputing the stats.I think the point is, JB had more rushing 1st downs...yes, it may be meaningless but it's a fact. That's all that was being pointed out.