Boldin in the Wildcat...who's with me?

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,412
Reaction score
2,184
Location
117 and Loving It
I think we could run the Wildcat to great results with Boldin back there. Guy can run, throw, do anything. He's a very dangerous weapon, and with the Wildcat trend going on right now, I wouldn't be surprised to see him back there in a game soon.
 

TJ

Knower of Ball
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
39,134
Reaction score
27,588
Location
South Bay
I like it

I also like how Warner would become a wide receiver. Imagine him running a fly route and Boldin hitting him in stride
 

Shane

This is my year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
75,871
Reaction score
54,656
Location
Las Vegas
Absolutely!
 

Pariah

H.S.
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
Chicago is going to do it with Hester. We saw a little of it yesterday with Carolina.

Sure. Why not?
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
17,055
Reaction score
19,107
how soon we all forget

the Cardinals ran that last year from time to time
 

Pariah

H.S.
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
how soon we all forget

the Cardinals ran that last year from time to time
They ran Boldin in the backfield, but it was still a traditional set that saw the occasional direct snap.

It wasn't the so-called Wilcat formation.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
The problem is that Warner isn't even as much of a threat as Pennington when he would have to flank out, and he might get broken in half.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
17,055
Reaction score
19,107
They ran Boldin in the backfield, but it was still a traditional set that saw the occasional direct snap.

It wasn't the so-called Wilcat formation.

it was a direct snap

they ran it in the SF game, and they ran it against Balt and Wash
 

SuperSpck

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Posts
7,977
Reaction score
15
Location
Iowa
The problem is that Warner isn't even as much of a threat as Pennington when he would have to flank out, and he might get broken in half.

So don't put Warner out there? Or is that a big part of why the WC works?
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
47,299
Reaction score
13,964
The problem is that Warner isn't even as much of a threat as Pennington when he would have to flank out, and he might get broken in half.

Yep, if it were Leinart instead of Warner, we'd have a better chance to see it.

So don't put Warner out there? Or is that a big part of why the WC works?

The threat of the receiver (WR) coming around on the end around to throw the ball is what makes it work. No way Warner could move those 10-15 steps needed to make it successful.
 

SuperSpck

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Posts
7,977
Reaction score
15
Location
Iowa
The threat of the receiver (WR) coming around on the end around to throw the ball is what makes it work. No way Warner could move those 10-15 steps needed to make it successful.

Ok, we know Rolle can throw the ball and he's played on offense recently...

Maybe we've just got him on the wrong side of the ball?
 
OP
OP
D-Dogg

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,412
Reaction score
2,184
Location
117 and Loving It
how soon we all forget

the Cardinals ran that last year from time to time

We ran him as an H-Back a few times. Not in a direct snap formation. The QB was there as well, and an option was the direct snap to Q.

I personally loved him in the H-Back but it was more meant to get him the ball in swing passes or handoffs. In the Wildcat, it puts the ball in his hands directly, immediately.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
47,299
Reaction score
13,964
We ran him as an H-Back a few times. Not in a direct snap formation. The QB was there as well, and an option was the direct snap to Q.

I personally loved him in the H-Back but it was more meant to get him the ball in swing passes or handoffs. In the Wildcat, it puts the ball in his hands directly, immediately.

Not true. Boldin had a couple direct snaps last year.
 
OP
OP
D-Dogg

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,412
Reaction score
2,184
Location
117 and Loving It
The problem is that Warner isn't even as much of a threat as Pennington when he would have to flank out, and he might get broken in half.

We probably can't put St. Pierre out there though, can we? Would that count as the 3rd string QB coming in even if he's technically at a WR spot?
 

Pariah

H.S.
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
In the Wildcat, it puts the ball in his hands directly, immediately.
With options to throw, pass, run, or handoff to the other HB, WR or the QB coming back from the flanker position.

It's really pretty ingenuous. While I think the NFL will figure it out soon enough, I also think it's something that's going to stay in a lot of team's playbooks if they have the right personnel.

When Vick comes back to the NFL (you know he will), I'd wager whoever signs him uses this formation a lot.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
47,299
Reaction score
13,964
Off of the H-Back though, right? I don't recall him ever lined up back there with no QB.

I don't think there was a QB back there. I remember it was in the red zone.

Hmm....
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
The thing about the Wildcat (which sets it apart a little from the Single Wing) is that it splits the QB wide as a WR.

The good thing about using Boldin in it is that, unlike most deep backs taking the direct snap - Boldin (a former QB) can also throw.

The negative, however, is that while many QB's are athletic enough to be a legitimate wideout threat split wide, Warner would essentially fill the role of a life-sized cardboard cutout.

Still, I'd like to see us use the Wildcat (but at least give it credit for actually being a version of the Single Wing).
 

SuperSpck

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Posts
7,977
Reaction score
15
Location
Iowa
Off of the H-Back though, right?

Speaking of: Detroit used Calvin Johnson from that position many times in the game against the Redskins. It worked for them, and Johnson doesn't have Boldin's physicality. I would like to see more Boldin-out-of-the-backfield plays. The emergence of Breaston makes that dream easier. It would be something the team could do out of conventional formations too, perhaps easing some pressure on the anemic running game.

I don't think there was a QB back there. I remember it was in the red zone.

Hmm....

2 point conversion in Washington last year?
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
9,774
Reaction score
6,802
Location
Iowa
Anybody remember the play where Kurt looks like somebody screwed up the play call and he walks off like he's about to call timeout, the center snaps the ball to a RB I think and he waltzes into the endzone. Think it was when Green was still here, and they actually stole it from the Steelers.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
54,951
Reaction score
7,941
Location
Cold Harbor
I think we could run the Wildcat to great results with Boldin back there. Guy can run, throw, do anything. He's a very dangerous weapon, and with the Wildcat trend going on right now, I wouldn't be surprised to see him back there in a game soon.
I thought this thread was about seeing Quan naked.
 
Top