Being a NMSU alum, it looks like I let the hatred for UNM get the best of me.Shutout huh?
Being a NMSU alum, it looks like I let the hatred for UNM get the best of me.Shutout huh?
Being a NMSU alum, it looks like I let the hatred for UNM get the best of me.
With that said, lots to work on obviously. Without a lot of improvement, we aren't going to be able to hang with USC. They are looking really tough.
Based on the first two games, I think ASU is going to have issues hanging not only with USC, but Stanford as UCLA as well. Too small and too young on defense. And if Kelly is out if sync in any of those games, it will spell trouble a they won't be able to rely on DJ rushing for 200 yards...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, here are some positives:
---58 points put up by the O
--35 point victory
---Defense shut out NM in the second half
--DJ over 200 yards rushing
--Richard looked awesome
--NM clamped down on Strong, but we made them pay elsewhere
--TK, though still not shining, was able to move the ball around more, including 41 yard bomb to Smith; improvement over last week on the long ball
--still keeping our penalties down, only 4;
--More experience for our young D
With that said, lots to work on obviously. Without a lot of improvement, we aren't going to be able to hang with USC. They are looking really tough.
Based on the first two games, I think ASU is going to have issues hanging not only with USC, but Stanford as UCLA as well. Too small and too young on defense. And if Kelly is out if sync in any of those games, it will spell trouble a they won't be able to rely on DJ rushing for 200 yards...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree on Stanford and USC, but have you watched UCLA play? They've looked all out of sorts. That big Thursday night UCLA-ASU game could end up being a slap fight if these two squads don't right the ship.