Arizona Cardinals have made a decision on QB Jacoby Brissett

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,968
Reaction score
24,689
Location
Modesto, California
Mind boggling! I'm not quite sure how anyone expected Brissett to win a few more games when the defense was giving up an average of 36.5 PPG in his starts while he had running backs that would struggle to be in the UFL and an offensive line that was made up of practice squad players, gets sacked 43 times in 12 games, yet manages to throw 23 TDs against 8 INTs and somehow he manages to help Wilson and McBride to career years.

People complained how Murray wouldn't stand in the pocket and take hits to complete passes yet Brissett did this on a consistent basis.
Agree. JB was not the problem
 

602 Native

ASFN Addict
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
5,989
Reaction score
11,037
Location
Gilbert
Mind boggling! I'm not quite sure how anyone expected Brissett to win a few more games when the defense was giving up an average of 36.5 PPG in his starts while he had running backs that would struggle to be in the UFL and an offensive line that was made up of practice squad players, gets sacked 43 times in 12 games, yet manages to throw 23 TDs against 8 INTs and somehow he manages to help Wilson and McBride to career years.

People complained how Murray wouldn't stand in the pocket and take hits to complete passes yet Brissett did this on a consistent basis.
Garbage stats activate.

JB absolutely cost us games last year. Dude was horrible in the redzone when it mattered and had the ball in his hands to end games last year.

The defense, running game, and oline were never good last year but winning 1 game out of 12 is horrendous no matter how it can be spun. The Cards put themselves here so it is what it is, but please stop telling us that JB is a good QB. He isn't, never has been, and never will be.
 

TRW

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Posts
8,467
Reaction score
8,577
Location
Avondale, AZ
JB is in the tier of Tyrod Taylor, Chase Daniel, Mitchell Trubisky, Marcus Mariota, Jameis Winston, et al. Valuable as a backup but you don't want them starting more than 2 or 3 games. If they are playing long term you get 1-12 or 3-10, something like that. They are pretty much career backups for a reason.

But, it's not my money so if Bidwill coughs up more for Jacoby, more power to him. But, if he starts he will be what he is, a backup starting and the record will, more than likely, reflect that.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
54,869
Reaction score
21,055
Location
CA
I think the best way to handle JB’s demand for more money would be to tell him either except the following, or you can be cut:

Your salary stays the same and we will pay you $750,000 per win **as a starter.
 
Last edited:

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,060
Reaction score
42,373
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I think the best way to handle JB’s demand for more money would be to tell him either except the following, or you can be cut:

Your salary stays the same and we will pay you $750,000 per win.
I’m sure he’d rather be cut. Are you prepared start the season — and play 17 games — with Minshew, Beck, and Slovis?
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,060
Reaction score
42,373
Location
Gilbert, AZ
brissett aint longterm - dude went 1-11 lmao - im supposed to be terrified of losing brissett
Yes the alternative is much worse. A major reason we were 1-11 was our execrable defense.

Brissett was probably the third major contributor to that finish after butt RBs and the defense. Coaching incompetence and OL injuries rank highly also.

Brissett in semi normal circumstances should lead you to an anonymous 6-11 season.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
54,869
Reaction score
21,055
Location
CA
I think latest Beck starts is wk 5 vs Detroit. Brissette can’t survive 1-3 or 0-4 start
 

BooksOrangePlanet

I was BirdGangThing
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
39,865
Reaction score
44,929
Location
Arcadia
Yes the alternative is much worse. A major reason we were 1-11 was our execrable defense.

Brissett was probably the third major contributor to that finish after butt RBs and the defense. Coaching incompetence and OL injuries rank highly also.

Brissett in semi normal circumstances should lead you to an anonymous 6-11 season.
i got us penciled in for 7 wins with brissett starting the season and beck finishing it so you're preaching to the choir

7 wins is worse than 8 wins - 9 wins or 10 wins

you know what's better than 7 wins in this division? 6 wins and so forth - i'd be happy to only get 3 wins again

brissett ain't doing ish for us this year aside from keeping the seat warm - 7 wins gets us right back to the same problem

if brissett wants starter money trade him to a team that might start him for pick(s) in next year's draft

You must be registered for see images attach


start minshew and wait to give beck a shot - hopefully we hit the lottery with beck but khaman - who are we kidding- and why are we giving a damn about winning 6 or 7 games in this division next year
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,060
Reaction score
42,373
Location
Gilbert, AZ
i got us penciled in for 7 wins with brissett starting the season and beck finishing it so you're preaching to the choir

7 wins is worse than 8 wins - 9 wins or 10 wins

you know what's better than 7 wins in this division? 6 wins and so forth - i'd be happy to only get 3 wins again

brissett ain't doing ish for us this year aside from keeping the seat warm - 7 wins gets us right back to the same problem

if brissett wants starter money trade him to a team that might start him for pick(s) in next year's draft

You must be registered for see images attach


start minshew and wait to give beck a shot - hopefully we hit the lottery with beck but khaman - who are we kidding- and why are we giving a damn about winning 6 or 7 games in this division next year
Never been a use case where a team lost its way to consistent success.

The Texans were 17-33 in the three seasons after the Watson debacle. Monti and Co are 15-36.
 

BooksOrangePlanet

I was BirdGangThing
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
39,865
Reaction score
44,929
Location
Arcadia
Never been a use case where a team lost its way to consistent success.

The Texans were 17-33 in the three seasons after the Watson debacle. Monti and Co are 15-36.
right on - none of that changes anything i stated maestro - we aint doing jack ish this year

why pay brissett when we can trade him - we're going to suck balls in this division regardless - less than a zero percent chance of making it to the dance - there is no major difference between brissett and minshew - they even both signed for about what? brissett got 2 years at 12 million - minshew got 1 year at 6 million

minshew didn't lose his last 9 starts neither

if both qbs are subpar af cut bait with the one demanding more money - especially if neither will be starting by the end of the year anyway
 

BooksOrangePlanet

I was BirdGangThing
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
39,865
Reaction score
44,929
Location
Arcadia
The solution is never to make the football less watchable
who says it would be less watchable - was last season watchable - you wanna run it back talking about watchable - sorry to go all allen iverson but khaman my guy is 9 losses in a row watchable? technically brissett is more watchable considering he doesn't move - but we haven't seen minshew or beck - are we declaring them unwatchable
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
29,911
Reaction score
41,317
Location
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
I think the best way to handle JB’s demand for more money would be to tell him either except the following, or you can be cut:

Your salary stays the same and we will pay you $750,000 per win **as a starter.
I wouldn't do wins as an incentive, but I'd do other stats...for the season and per game. Like measuring his performance having a clean game (no turnovers) or completion %...YPA...stuff like that.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,060
Reaction score
42,373
Location
Gilbert, AZ
who says it would be less watchable - was last season watchable - you wanna run it back talking about watchable - sorry to go all allen iverson but khaman my guy is 9 losses in a row watchable? technically brissett is more watchable considering he doesn't move - but we haven't seen minshew or beck - are we declaring them unwatchable
It was more watchable because of McBride and Wilson. The Passtronaut didn’t make those guys shine like that.

Brissett wasn’t the primary reason for the 1-11 finish.
 
Top