- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Posts
- 11,660
- Reaction score
- 844
Or just high in general.He doesnt have to be as high on him, just somewhat high on him.
Or just high in general.He doesnt have to be as high on him, just somewhat high on him.
That would work.Or just high in general.
can you finally stop bringing up D'Antoni?
We just need to waive Knight
Then we are stuck with his contract on the salary cap. Better to wait until his value equals at least an expiring contract.
that means you hold on to him until the last year of his deal? No thanks. You're stuck with his contract either way in the above scenario until the last year and all the while, his cancer sits on the bench... or worse, on the court, making us worse in the meantime.
that means you hold on to him until the last year of his deal? No thanks. You're stuck with his contract either way in the above scenario until the last year and all the while, his cancer sits on the bench... or worse, on the court, making us worse in the meantime.
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I don't want to hold onto him until his contract is expiring. I'm just hoping that some team would possibly take him for an expiring contract. I'm no Knight fan, and it seems like his value is not there now, but I don't think that it is unrealistic that someone could take a chance on him at some point in the not-too-distant future, thus giving us cap room. If you just cut him, you lose that as a possibility.
Ah gotcha. I think it's SUPER unlikely any team wants that piece of garbage, especially at his contract number.
Then again, there's a new Isiah Thomas-level idiot running the Lakeshow now, so hope springs eternal!
Sarver has been the owner for 13 years now. D'Antoni has been gone for almost 9 years!
At some point, your pointless argument is going to run out of steam, if it hasn't already.
Whoa is us! We suck and Mike D'Antoni has a good team! Waaaaah!
WHO CARES?