Jalen Green 'Preciation Thread

Carolinacacti

ASFN Lifer
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2007
Posts
2,954
Reaction score
1,886
Location
Charlotte NC
Ish said run it back. pretty sure that meant Book, Green, Dillon and the three they resigned. Green has been working out. If I had his money and girl friend, the gym would be outa sight
 
OP
OP
Hoop Head

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
24,679
Reaction score
21,556
Location
Your Head, Rent Free
Chicago for sure is a good match. They don't have a primary scorer to build around. They just drafted a young guy who could be that in Caleb Wilson, and they signed Norman Powell. Supposedly, they want to move Josh Giddey so they can get Coby White back in the lineup as a more athletic PG, as they are trying to build a team that is high flying and athletically oriented.

So, a Green for Giddey type of trade would work well for both teams. The Suns need a floor leader who can play a more half court oriented game, and the Bulls are moving towards a more explosive profile lineup. Plus, the contracts also line up nearly perfectly.

Chicago traded Coby White to Charlotte last season.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
28,755
Reaction score
23,103
Location
The Giant Toaster
Chicago for sure is a good match. They don't have a primary scorer to build around. They just drafted a young guy who could be that in Caleb Wilson, and they signed Norman Powell. Supposedly, they want to move Josh Giddey so they can get Coby White back in the lineup as a more athletic PG, as they are trying to build a team that is high flying and athletically oriented.

So, a Green for Giddey type of trade would work well for both teams. The Suns need a floor leader who can play a more half court oriented game, and the Bulls are moving towards a more explosive profile lineup. Plus, the contracts also line up nearly perfectly.
Giddey is more efficient and far better passer/rebounder. But then again it’s the Bulls so they might as well call and try.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,324
Reaction score
16,565
Location
Laveen, AZ
For the 2026-27 season, Josh Giddey is making a base salary of $25,000,000 on his current deal, while Jalen Green is earning $36,000,000.

Jalen Green: Signed a 3-year, $105,333,333 rookie extension with the Houston Rockets (now with the Phoenix Suns), which is fully guaranteed

You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach
 

taz02

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 8, 2007
Posts
1,101
Reaction score
687
The problem with Jalen Green is not Jalen Green. It’s the Green/Booker pairing.
We'll have to see if they can both stay healthy.

It may work, if we can defend the paint and rebound. Jalen can hit big shots, something we have sorely lacked in a number of playoffs.

The lineup of Brooks, Williams, Booker and Green really never had a chance to gel with all of the injuries.
 
OP
OP
Hoop Head

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
24,679
Reaction score
21,556
Location
Your Head, Rent Free

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,324
Reaction score
16,565
Location
Laveen, AZ

BooksOrangePlanet

I was BirdGangThing
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
40,908
Reaction score
45,970
Location
Arcadia
OP
OP
Hoop Head

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
24,679
Reaction score
21,556
Location
Your Head, Rent Free
that what i was thinking - homie takes a lot of shots but he'll get extended regardless

Depends on the money. I really hope they don't give him a max extension. He's eligible to sign a 4 year $240 million dollar deal in October, the anniversary of his last contract. The first year would be $50.7m with 8% raises, ending at $66m. He's not worth that.

If we can retain him somewhere around $25-30 million then I'd be fine with that. It wouldn't cripple us if he does improve and should be traceable, especially if there are player options or non guaranteed salary.

People can say what they want about Book and his salary but I don't think anyone would argue Green is worth the same money as him annually.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
23,075
Reaction score
7,747
Depends on the money. I really hope they don't give him a max extension. He's eligible to sign a 4 year $240 million dollar deal in October, the anniversary of his last contract. The first year would be $50.7m with 8% raises, ending at $66m. He's not worth that.

If we can retain him somewhere around $25-30 million then I'd be fine with that. It wouldn't cripple us if he does improve and should be traceable, especially if there are player options or non guaranteed salary.

People can say what they want about Book and his salary but I don't think anyone would argue Green is worth the same money as him
I can’t imagine they are even considering a max extension. Right now they are still trying to determine if they want him on this team.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
38,511
Reaction score
19,504
Depends on the money. I really hope they don't give him a max extension. He's eligible to sign a 4 year $240 million dollar deal in October, the anniversary of his last contract. The first year would be $50.7m with 8% raises, ending at $66m. He's not worth that.

If we can retain him somewhere around $25-30 million then I'd be fine with that. It wouldn't cripple us if he does improve and should be traceable, especially if there are player options or non guaranteed salary.

People can say what they want about Book and his salary but I don't think anyone would argue Green is worth the same money as him annually.
I really feel like the NBA is changing dramatically with the current CBA and players such as Green are going to have to start getting their big paydays AFTER they've developed. The risk betting on a player to hit their potential is no longer worth it, IMO.

I've said it a few times but I really believe teams will now be better off with a pretty good guard making 20 or 30 per than a very good guard making 50 or more. And that applies to the other positions too. Save the big checks for the very rare players that can carry teams.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,324
Reaction score
16,565
Location
Laveen, AZ
I really feel like the NBA is changing dramatically with the current CBA and players such as Green are going to have to start getting their big paydays AFTER they've developed. The risk betting on a player to hit their potential is no longer worth it, IMO.

I've said it a few times but I really believe teams will now be better off with a pretty good guard making 20 or 30 per than a very good guard making 50 or more. And that applies to the other positions too. Save the big checks for the very rare players that can carry teams.
If Luka couldn't get the max from Dallas, it really makes you wonder. He was arguably one of those guys you would pay, and yet Dallas really thought about it hard, and said no.
 

leclerc

The smooth operator
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Posts
3,312
Reaction score
2,340
Location
Norway
Plus it is Luka sitting there. Probably not the most likeable character to pay a kings ransom.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
134,188
Reaction score
74,416
I really feel like the NBA is changing dramatically with the current CBA and players such as Green are going to have to start getting their big paydays AFTER they've developed. The risk betting on a player to hit their potential is no longer worth it, IMO.

I've said it a few times but I really believe teams will now be better off with a pretty good guard making 20 or 30 per than a very good guard making 50 or more. And that applies to the other positions too. Save the big checks for the very rare players that can carry teams.

Don't tell the Wizards about that. They just signed Trae Young to that huge contract extension.
 

Raindog

I didn't come here to be liked!
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Posts
6,227
Reaction score
8,093
The Wizards do that. How else do you get anyone to stay and play in that God-forsaken town?
It's sad. The (old) Bullets were one of the marquee franchises when I first started following the league as a kid. Now it's going on almost 50 years of them being a punchline.

As a sidebar, I know "Bullets'" probably wasn't the most ideal team identity ever, but changing it to "Wizards" and then adopting that possibly lamest ever logo sure didn't help.
 
OP
OP
Hoop Head

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
24,679
Reaction score
21,556
Location
Your Head, Rent Free
It's sad. The (old) Bullets were one of the marquee franchises when I first started following the league as a kid. Now it's going on almost 50 years of them being a punchline.

As a sidebar, I know "Bullets'" probably wasn't the most ideal team identity ever, but changing it to "Wizards" and then adopting that possibly lamest ever logo sure didn't help.

They have had short runs like when they had Arenas, Larry Hughes, and Antwaun Jamison. Then again briefly with Wall and Beal. They cant stay healthy and they just added 2 chronic injury cases in Trae Young and Anthony Davis. Sarr and Dybantas should be a good pair but I can't see them staying in Washington.

I can't believe we're almost 30 years of the Wizards now, changing in 97.

I thought they changed it after/in response to the DC Sniper but that was 2002. The other finalists were actually worse than the Wizards. They were the Dragons, Express, Stallions, and Sea Dogs. Had the Internet been bigger at the time then I'd believe it was a troll campaign to get 5 awful names. Even MJ couldn't make the Wizards moniker cool though, which says something.

 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,408,141
Posts
6,638,257
Members
6,435
Latest member
taylor_fancav
Top