Dr. Jones
Has No Time For Love
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2004
- Posts
- 33,547
- Reaction score
- 21,848
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
For the complainers, who would you have taken?
Fano?? Don't say Styles.
It's a heart, not a head pick.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Can you read between the lines??Well..... Looks like we are trying to be the first overall next year because this is exactly how you accomplish that. Wonder what team we will trade him too (a sure fire SB contender) when we decide he's not worth the new contract number.
No matter who they picked..... this what they are up against.
You must be registered for see images attach
Whoever was taken there would be paid that. BEST PLAYER IN THE DRAFT!!!xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Funny how people had no issue with Titans spending as much to take him @ 4th in all the mocks smhxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Yeah, I would have. Not that I would have been all happy about that either. But I think he's much more likely to be a solid starter for 5 to 10 years. RBs are just too high risk with health. IMHO.For the complainers, who would you have taken?
Fano?? Don't say Styles.
Fair point.It's a heart, not a head pick.
All we can do is cross our fingers and hope.

You don't want a solid starter at 3. You want a difference maker.Yeah, I would have. Not that I would have been all happy about that either. But I think he's much more likely to be a solid starter for 5 to 10 years. RBs are just too high risk with health. IMHO.
The owner made the pick and Monti would have picked jelly roll if it would have made the owner happy …bet the other teams in our division chuckled…running back at 3 lolYeah, I would have. Not that I would have been all happy about that either. But I think he's much more likely to be a solid starter for 5 to 10 years. RBs are just too high risk with health. IMHO.
I get the argument. I hope it works.You don't want a solid starter at 3. You want a difference maker.
Love might turn out to not be that but still the right pick at 3.
LolYou don't want a solid starter at 3. You want a difference maker.
Love might turn out to not be that but still the right pick at 3.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
How about teams that took a RT or a LB with 7 total sacks?xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
This. Can’t take an RB that high (3) but good pick for Titans (4). HmmmmmFunny how people had no issue with Titans spending as much to take him @ 4th in all the mocks smh
Who said it was a good pick for the titans?This. Can’t take an RB that high (3) but good pick for Titans (4). Hmmmmm
If Love gets 850 rushing yards and the cards go 5-12 I don’t think it does much for Monti’s job security.This screams, “my job’s on the line and I can ill afford someone who’s gonna take a year or two to develop”
Most tackles taken in the first 21 picks since the 2003 draft
Of course, since we need one
We could have had one…now Jacoby will take another beating…..notice wonder he wanted moneyMost tackles taken in the first 21 picks since the 2003 draft
Of course, since we need one
i think monti's job is safe as hell if we go 5-12 or even 3-14If Love gets 850 rushing yards and the cards go 5-12 I don’t think it does much for Monti’s job security.