- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Posts
- 97,730
- Reaction score
- 82,882
agree with all of the above.Right. The only reason I would start Brooks is if I believed that he would contribute to the development of Dunn, Rasheer, Khaman, or Green in that role. And I really just don't see it right now. I do think having Brooks on this team is not a bad thing if he brings that competitive nasty that has always been part of his game. If he is unhappy on a rebuilding team, he needs to go.