kerouac9
Klowned by Keim
Yup, but is there a player-specific category?
Kyler Murray 2022 Splits | Pro-Football-Reference.com
Kyler Murray 2022 Splits
Scroll down to snap type and huddle. Is this what you’re looking for?
Yup, but is there a player-specific category?
This makes no sense. Why would we end up with someone worse due to timing? The only time this team hires a new coach is when the existing fact pattern is completely dysfunctional. That’s not gonna change if they wait a season.Nope. I've said Kliff should go. Just not now.
In my opinion if he goes now we likely end up with someone worse. In which case might as well let him hold the bag for next year while seeing if things improve with a new GM.
So he’s the only realistic person on hardy. Got it.Sources say Kyler is the Stout of the Cardinals facility. Always cranky, always thinks the team sucks.
I think you two would get along.![]()
Yup. Thanks.![]()
Kyler Murray 2022 Splits | Pro-Football-Reference.com
Kyler Murray 2022 Splitswww.pro-football-reference.com
Scroll down to snap type and huddle. Is this what you’re looking for?
Let’s put it this way: would any other team in the league consider him for their same position? No? Then no.
I dont think Rosen would have been as bad under Kliff.No? Coming off a season where we picked #1 and our QB would’ve been . . . Josh Rosen? We may have gotten the #1 pick again.
Having the #1 overall pick in back-to-back years is almost unprecedented. I’m pretty sure in modern Super Bowl history the Bucs & Jags have only done it.No? Coming off a season where we picked #1 and our QB would’ve been . . . Josh Rosen? We may have gotten the #1 pick again.
You found one!![]()
New York Giants Complete Interview with Cardinals VP of Player Personnel Quentin Harris - Sports Illustrated New York Giants News, Analysis and More
The Giants finished interviewing the third of nine reported candidates for their vacant general manager position on Thursday afternoon.www.si.com
...dave
Then you must think highly of kliff bc Rosen has bombed under how many coaches now?I dont think Rosen would have been as bad under Kliff.
I mean look how much better Tua is without Flores. Rosen was dealt the same hand.
And I still think we would have brought in another QB as well if he outright bombed.
Then add Bosa's impact on defense. I just dont see us as bad as the Bengals. We maybe could have been in Chargers territory, but just not sure.
There is that. But if he took bosa (which was kinda the no brainer if you weren’t taking kyler) he wouldn’t have had much choice but to pick a qb and we undoubtedly would’ve been picking in top 3-4, even if we didn’t get the #1. So that means we would’ve likely landed one of burrow, Herbert, or tua (likely tua, but would that be worse than kyler at this point?).Having the #1 overall pick in back-to-back years is almost unprecedented. I’m pretty sure in modern Super Bowl history the Bucs & Jags have only done it.
I also been lol’ing at the “We could’ve had Bosa then Burrow or Herbert” as if Steve Keim would’ve made the right pick. That’s what’s really hilarious.
I dont think Rosen would have been as bad under Kliff.
I mean look how much better Tua is without Flores. Rosen was dealt the same hand.
And I still think we would have brought in another QB as well if he outright bombed.
Then add Bosa's impact on defense. I just dont see us as bad as the Bengals. We maybe could have been in Chargers territory, but just not sure.
Cleveland did it with Garrett and Mayfield.Having the #1 overall pick in back-to-back years is almost unprecedented. I’m pretty sure in modern Super Bowl history the Bucs & Jags have only done it.
I also been lol’ing at the “We could’ve had Bosa then Burrow or Herbert” as if Steve Keim would’ve made the right pick. That’s what’s really hilarious.
We probably would be in a worse spot with Tua than Kyler. Tua is starting to tumble the past month while having the best WR duo + brilliant offensive mind. I like Tua, but Burrow & Herbert we would be the clear-cut better options.There is that. But if he took bosa (which was kinda the no brainer if you weren’t taking kyler) he wouldn’t have had much choice but to pick a qb and we undoubtedly would’ve been picking in top 3-4, even if we didn’t get the #1. So that means we would’ve likely landed one of burrow, Herbert, or tua (likely tua, but would that be worse than kyler at this point?).
Went over my mind.Cleveland did it with Garrett and Mayfield.
No doubt. I meant would we be any worse off if we had tua instead of kyler (not burrow or Herbert). The reasoning being it would’ve been keim and tua had been hyped for two years and keim woulda bought the hype.We probably would be in a worse spot with Tua than Kyler. Tua is starting to tumble the past month while having the best WR duo + brilliant offensive mind. I like Tua, but Burrow & Herbert we would be the clear-cut better options.
I dunno. Reports have been that McDaniels has been relentlessly upbeat with Tua since he arrived, but part of that is how he’s been beaten down the past couple years.No doubt. I meant would we be any worse off if we had tua instead of kyler (not burrow or Herbert). The reasoning being it would’ve been keim and tua had been hyped for two years and keim woulda bought the hype.
The problem with us playing under center was 99.9% of the time it was a run. The opposition KNEW It was a running play.Yup. Thanks.
I’m starting to believe the QBs not going under center is a Kliff problem. Colt really doesn’t seem that far off than Kyler does. Even with less starts, I would’ve sworn Colt lined up a lot more under center than Kyler if you only read the criticism of Kyler “not preferring going under center” on here.
I know I said it early, but I guess we’ll fully see the whole picture with the next HC.
The problem with us playing under center was 99.9% of the time it was a run. The opposition KNEW It was a running play.
I’d have to say that’s a mistake. My son and I mentioned this every they went under center.Stats say that from 27 snaps under C 10 were runs and 17 were passes this season.
Which surprised me too.
Oh. So you and your son suffer from confirmation bias.I’d have to say that’s a mistake. My son and I mentioned this every they went under center.
Didn't have to research it, i remembered when it happened - it was only 11 months ago and it was discussed a fair amount on this board - and it took me 5 seconds to Google "Quentin Harris GM interview".You found one!
(Just as an inquiry: why was this question important enough for you to take time to research it?)

Maybe bad memory but not biased.Oh. So you and your son suffer from confirmation bias.
I didn’t make a statement. I asked a question.Didn't have to research it, i remembered when it happened - it was only 11 months ago and it was discussed a fair amount on this board - and it took me 5 seconds to Google "Quentin Harris GM interview".
Just as an inquiry: why was it important enough for you to take time to respond as above when I simply corrected your erroneous memory? Do you think it's good for false statements to go uncorrected?
...dbs
P.S. Funny, in February I was skeptical that Harris was taken seriously as a GM candidate despite that interview... but your brother had no problem pulling up a bunch of links to support his claim that Harris IS a legit GM candidate "around the league".
Arizona Cardinals off season news Jan 25-Feb 25, 2021
Those two are the favorites and Harris is currently higher in the org so my guess is it would be him. To me, either one is a really scary proposition. My basic argument is that since both have essentially been brought up under Keim, that both are unlikely to be much of a change. It's possible...www.arizonasportsfans.com
Like Tucker Carlson asks questions. Stop being deliberately obtuse.I didn’t make a statement. I asked a question.