I agree with all of this but the bolded part in particular bothers me. I remember when the Suns fell to 4 in the Jackson draft how mad some people were that we lost out on the chance to take Jackson, with it being seen as a 3 player draft of sorts with Fultz, Ball, and Jackson going #1, #2, #3. It's the ultimate revisionist history since we never had a chance to draft Tatum, who is now the most coveted player from that draft. Everyone knew JJ would take time, there was plenty of patience last year but once he started rolling towards February and March most people had packed Warren's bags as a piece to be dealt during the offseason because JJ was our answer at SF and our 2nd star. Winning the lottery and getting Ayton lowered Jackson's spot in the talent hierarchy on this team but a lot of people assumed we had our "Big 3" until JJ sucked in Summer League. It's weird how Summer League turned people against certain players but at the same time if someone played well then it was discounted as Summer League and it didn't matter. I couldn't make sense of that. Why was Summer League enough to call someone bad but not enough to call someone good? Especially when we saw the "bad" player perform much better in the NBA already.