AsUpRoDiGy
Magnanimous
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Really looking forward to this one. Always love Christopher Nolan's films.
So needless to say...they liked it? LolFriends from Warner Bros have already seen it. Said it's really, really intense like Private Ryan, but not gory like Private Ryan. One even said he thought he got PTSD just from watching it...
No you fleeb, it will only rub jackasses like yourself the wrong way. Normal thinking people will watch it and accept it as the period piece that it is.The trio of timelines can be jarring as you figure out how they all fit, and the fact that there are only a couple of women and no lead actors of color may rub some the wrong way. Still, Nolan’s feat is undeniable: He’s made an immersive war movie that celebrates the good of mankind while also making it clear that no victory is without sacrifice.
Unfortunately the SJW's at USA Today decided to politicize their review by commenting that although it's an excellent film, there weren't enough women and people of color in the cast: https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...xplores-heroism-innovative-fashion/482574001/
No you fleeb, it will only rub jackasses like yourself the wrong way. Normal thinking people will watch it and accept it as the period piece that it is.
So basically the writer wanted Nolan to rewrite history in order to satisfy political correctness. I mean, really? The battle consisted of British, Dutch, Belgian, and German military. My guess there weren't a whole lot of people of color living in the area at that time let alone any serving in the military. Everything doesn't have to be all inclusive and there's nothing wrong with presenting history as it happened and not how you wished it was but that doesn't keep these dipsticks from politicizing everything. Just review the frigging movie as it is and be done with it.
No, I'm not because this PC garbage is getting out of hand. I mean, why bother saying it at all if it wasn't to make some kind of political point? As I said, normal thinking people will watch the movie and enjoy it for the historical period piece that it is just like I can watch a movie like Barber Shop and not care that the cast is 99% black because *gasp* there might actually be predominantly black neighborhoods. Basically there was no need for the writer, in a prominent newspaper to have to make a sideways political statement like that, specially for a movie like this.jeez dude... all he said was it MAY rub SOME the wrong way. And it was simply ONE line in the review. Feel like you're overreacting a little bit on this with this rant.
No, I'm not because this PC garbage is getting out of hand. I mean, why bother saying it at all if it wasn't to make some kind of political point?
As I said, normal thinking people will watch the movie and enjoy it for the historical period piece that it is just like I can watch a movie like Barber Shop and not care that the cast is 99% black because *gasp* there might actually be predominantly black neighborhoods. Basically there was no need for the writer, in a prominent newspaper to have to make a sideways political statement like that, specially for a movie like this.
Normal thinking people will watch it and accept it as the period piece that it is.
Still looking.What/Who are 'normal thinking people'?
Unfortunately the SJW's at USA Today decided to politicize their review by commenting that although it's an excellent film, there weren't enough women and people of color in the cast: https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...xplores-heroism-innovative-fashion/482574001/
No you fleeb, it will only rub jackasses like yourself the wrong way. Normal thinking people will watch it and accept it as the period piece that it is.
So basically the writer wanted Nolan to rewrite history in order to satisfy political correctness. I mean, really? The battle consisted of British, Dutch, Belgian, and German military. My guess there weren't a whole lot of people of color living in the area at that time let alone any serving in the military. Everything doesn't have to be all inclusive and there's nothing wrong with presenting history as it happened and not how you wished it was but that doesn't keep these dipsticks from politicizing everything. Just review the frigging movie as it is and be done with it.
maybe to let certain people who don't want to watch a movie about all white men know that it might not be their thing?
Yes it is. But I am going to the 6pm showing today at the AMC IMAX. Next best thing.It's a shame Arizona's only 70mm IMAX theater is at the Grand Canyon
No, I'm not because this PC garbage is getting out of hand. I mean, why bother saying it at all if it wasn't to make some kind of political point? As I said, normal thinking people will watch the movie and enjoy it for the historical period piece that it is just like I can watch a movie like Barber Shop and not care that the cast is 99% black because *gasp* there might actually be predominantly black neighborhoods. Basically there was no need for the writer, in a prominent newspaper to have to make a sideways political statement like that, specially for a movie like this.
didnt catch that this is a nolan film, thats good news. Going to avoid the trailers, try to do that for anything I actually want to see.
Same here, I started doing that a couple years ago and it makes the movies a lot more interesting to me. It just sucks to have all the major events of a film imprinted on your mind before you even see it, especially since most trailers show every freaking plot point nowadays, leaving only the conclusion to the imagination and most times not even that.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/19/movies/dunkirk-review/index.html'Dunkirk:' Christopher Nolan triumphs with World War II epic
If he says it sucks then that's gotta mean it will be winning lots of Oscars!gambo says it sucks so it must be good