We tried to get him before.
He seems to buried on Tampa Bays depth chart.
He fits BA's mold.
He is 6"6" and 232 lbs. and is only 25 years old with 2 years experience.
He has a career 83.7 QB rating playing on a terrible team with no wr's
He has thrown twice as many Td's as Ints. (29/15)
He has a completion % of nearly 60% and has a strong arm.
I say let's go get him and why not? To draft any rookie would be a risk much bigger than Glennon and that QB would be starting from scratch.
We need somebody that can step in and play in 2015 and beyond should Palmer not be able to answer the bell. He seems to be a bright kid. A year on the bench to learn our system would be ideal. But if he had to step in tommorow I could live with the growing pains knowing we could possibly have a QB in plae for a minimum of 5 or 6 years.
Please don't say Stanton is the answer. There is a reason he has been a back-up for his entire career and has been oft injured. Would you REALLY feel confident heading into opening day with Stanton as our starting QB for the 2015 season? And even if we HAD to do that wouldn't you feel a bit better about Glenno coming off the bench if (when) Stanton ( or Palmer) went down?
After this season, I say it's a no brainer. Even if it cost us a draft pick it sure seems like a safer bet than the Logan Thomas 4th round pick. LT may develop 1 day, but we are in a position to win now. Those windows don't stay open for very long.
Any thoughts on what you'd give up for Glennon?
He seems to buried on Tampa Bays depth chart.
He fits BA's mold.
He is 6"6" and 232 lbs. and is only 25 years old with 2 years experience.
He has a career 83.7 QB rating playing on a terrible team with no wr's
He has thrown twice as many Td's as Ints. (29/15)
He has a completion % of nearly 60% and has a strong arm.
I say let's go get him and why not? To draft any rookie would be a risk much bigger than Glennon and that QB would be starting from scratch.
We need somebody that can step in and play in 2015 and beyond should Palmer not be able to answer the bell. He seems to be a bright kid. A year on the bench to learn our system would be ideal. But if he had to step in tommorow I could live with the growing pains knowing we could possibly have a QB in plae for a minimum of 5 or 6 years.
Please don't say Stanton is the answer. There is a reason he has been a back-up for his entire career and has been oft injured. Would you REALLY feel confident heading into opening day with Stanton as our starting QB for the 2015 season? And even if we HAD to do that wouldn't you feel a bit better about Glenno coming off the bench if (when) Stanton ( or Palmer) went down?
After this season, I say it's a no brainer. Even if it cost us a draft pick it sure seems like a safer bet than the Logan Thomas 4th round pick. LT may develop 1 day, but we are in a position to win now. Those windows don't stay open for very long.
Any thoughts on what you'd give up for Glennon?