Where is Dan??

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
318
Location
Texas
Haven't seen him all morning. D-Line is getting man handled.

Cardinals are required by Arizona statute 432.54 of the Sporting and Entertainment Code to play 30+ year old former Steelers a minimum amount of time each season or face severe fines and penalties.
 

Shane

This is my year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
75,858
Reaction score
54,632
Location
Las Vegas
Getting engulfed
 

Shane

This is my year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
75,858
Reaction score
54,632
Location
Las Vegas
Does he play on O now? :)
 

thirty-two

boglehead
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2003
Posts
27,003
Reaction score
4,029
Cardinals are required by Arizona statute 432.54 of the Sporting and Entertainment Code to play 30+ year old former Steelers a minimum amount of time each season or face severe fines and penalties.

LOL
 
OP
OP
Brian

Brian

PANEM ET CIRCENSES
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
8,022
Reaction score
280
Location
With the mob
I mean I LITERALLY haven't seen him on the field at all. Not saying he isn't playing well, he doesn't appear to be playing at all.
 

Shane

This is my year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
75,858
Reaction score
54,632
Location
Las Vegas
He's playing
 

thirty-two

boglehead
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2003
Posts
27,003
Reaction score
4,029
he had a nice bat down on the last series
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,575
Reaction score
33,308
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
No way. I pin this one on our linebackers. Lenon is a good...backup. I probably could have plugged gaps better than Bradley. I mean, our linebackers SUCKED.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
No way. I pin this one on our linebackers. Lenon is a good...backup. I probably could have plugged gaps better than Bradley. I mean, our linebackers SUCKED.

Lenon is actually real good.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
318
Location
Texas
It could also be the failure of a mobile but less-than-stout D-Line in the 3-4 to keep blockers off the LB's.

No its the fault of the coaching staff for having Dlinemen like Dan Williams and Carter and Holliday on the Bench while Darnell Dockett, Nick (Brian Robinson) Eason and Calais Campbell play DT.

During the 80 TD yard drive I was talking about in another thread where the Cards just got steamrolled they were in that 2-4 I've been concerned about since last season again with Dockett and Campbell at DT when Hightower ran for 20 yards.

Oh and Mitch, the Cards were leaving edge rushers unblocked again.
 
Last edited:

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,484
Reaction score
21,643
Location
Plainfield, Il.
At one point I thought we were putting player in a position to suceed. I'm not so sure this organization does that anymore, if ever.

How can you try to be a 3-4 defense without 4 or 5 solid LB's, and a powerful unmovable NT?

That is a fundamental flaw placed squarely on the shoulders of the front office, scouting and coaching staff.

Take a look at what the Patriots are doing this year. They have incorporated a 2 TE offense with a basic philosophy. Try to stack up and stop them from running and either TE creates a matchup nightmare in the passing game.
Okay, let's fool them. Let's play 6 db's and what do they do? They run the ball down your throat which sets up play action.
Crap like that just doesn't happen. It is designed.

Nothing against Horton because I do like the more aggresive style, but this organization should have gone out and signed a true experienced DC that could adapt to the personel. It is so obvious to many of us we have the personel to be a better 4-3 D than we do for a 3-4. HOWEVER, since we are hell bent on being a 3-4 and we have a "Steeler" taught 3-4 DC , well by golly, that's what we are going to do.
 

Jasper

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 16, 2002
Posts
2,886
Reaction score
1,335
Location
Surrounded by Rams and Chargers
At one point I thought we were putting player in a position to suceed. I'm not so sure this organization does that anymore, if ever.

How can you try to be a 3-4 defense without 4 or 5 solid LB's, and a powerful unmovable NT?

That is a fundamental flaw placed squarely on the shoulders of the front office, scouting and coaching staff.

Take a look at what the Patriots are doing this year. They have incorporated a 2 TE offense with a basic philosophy. Try to stack up and stop them from running and either TE creates a matchup nightmare in the passing game.
Okay, let's fool them. Let's play 6 db's and what do they do? They run the ball down your throat which sets up play action.
Crap like that just doesn't happen. It is designed.

Nothing against Horton because I do like the more aggresive style, but this organization should have gone out and signed a true experienced DC that could adapt to the personel. It is so obvious to many of us we have the personel to be a better 4-3 D than we do for a 3-4. HOWEVER, since we are hell bent on being a 3-4 and we have a "Steeler" taught 3-4 DC , well by golly, that's what we are going to do.

I'm not sure if it is all Horton's fault.
He could have been brought in by Whiz saying you will get the DC job but you have to turn the D into a true 3-4. Also with the clause do with what you've got. The front office will bring in some new players to help but you must run an aggressive 3-4.

He could of said he can turn this defense into a top ten in the league but it won't be a 3-4 with this personnel, Whiz overrules saying it is either a 3-4 or no job for you.
 

WarnerHOF

Registered
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Posts
2,784
Reaction score
0
We are a 43 defense? Where are the linebackers (aside from Daryl Washington who is a stud in the current D) and defensive ends for our 43 defense? Switching to a 43 defense would just be going around in circles. :confused: The only player who isn't being used to full strength in the 34 D is Dockett since his strength is shooting his gap every play instead of read and react.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,736
Reaction score
4,738
Location
Monroe NC


How can you try to be a 3-4 defense without 4 or 5 solid LB's, and a powerful unmovable NT?

That is a fundamental flaw placed squarely on the shoulders of the front office, scouting and coaching staff.

Take a look at what the Patriots are doing this year. They have incorporated a 2 TE offense with a basic philosophy. Try to stack up and stop them from running and either TE creates a matchup nightmare in the passing game.
Okay, let's fool them. Let's play 6 db's and what do they do? They run the ball down your throat which sets up play action.
Crap like that just doesn't happen. It is designed.

Nothing against Horton because I do like the more aggresive style, but this organization should have gone out and signed a true experienced DC that could adapt to the personel. It is so obvious to many of us we have the personel to be a better 4-3 D than we do for a 3-4. HOWEVER, since we are hell bent on being a 3-4 and we have a "Steeler" taught 3-4 DC , well by golly, that's what we are going to do.

Totally agree with this statement. I do not believe this coaching staff has a clue on how to get the best out of what they have. Whiz insists we play a 3-4 when the talent is a better fit for a 4-3.
 

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,575
Reaction score
33,308
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Lenon is actually real good.

In no way, shape or form is Lenon 'real good'. He is a passable starter if playing next to a stud like Washington. We saw this weekend how godawful he is when he has to be 'the guy' at MLBer. Passable starter/spot starter when next to a stud, and a complete dud when leading the defense.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
318
Location
Texas
I'm not sure if it is all Horton's fault.
He could have been brought in by Whiz saying you will get the DC job but you have to turn the D into a true 3-4. Also with the clause do with what you've got. The front office will bring in some new players to help but you must run an aggressive 3-4.

He could of said he can turn this defense into a top ten in the league but it won't be a 3-4 with this personnel, Whiz overrules saying it is either a 3-4 or no job for you.

A lot of people put a lot of faith in Horton even though it was his first gig as DC and the Secondary was the weakest part of the Steelers defense. Of course that's like saying the weakest part of Ali was his left hook. So I don't know why anyone would expect major improvement right away just because Davis was gone and Horton was here. But many of you did.

I'm seeing a lot of the same defensive alignments as last year. Blitzes look somewhat different but aren't that much more effective.

I'm thinking that Horton just didn't have time to put in anything really new, we lost both our starting CBs from last year, he's a rookie DC, and the Cards were pitiful on defense to begin with. Not exactly a recipe for having even a mid level defense this season. No matter where the new DC came from.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,484
Reaction score
21,643
Location
Plainfield, Il.
I'm not sure if it is all Horton's fault.
He could have been brought in by Whiz saying you will get the DC job but you have to turn the D into a true 3-4. Also with the clause do with what you've got. The front office will bring in some new players to help but you must run an aggressive 3-4.

He could of said he can turn this defense into a top ten in the league but it won't be a 3-4 with this personnel, Whiz overrules saying it is either a 3-4 or no job for you.

I'm not blaming Horton. And with the way this off season was nothing can really be evaluated yet.

What I'm saying is maybe the Cards could have gone out and gotten Wade Phillips, a proven experienced DC. Horton is a rookie coming into a very difficult situation. He is learning on the job. Maybe with this group and the circumstances this year it is the perfect time to let him learn.

But keep this in mind. He is now our 3rd DC under Whiz. At what point do we place blame on the system? At what point do we blame the scouting staff and the front office for not getting the right personel? At what point do we say, "You know what? Joey Porter simply cannot be asked to drop into coverage"?
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
318
Location
Texas
I'm not blaming Horton. And with the way this off season was nothing can really be evaluated yet.

What I'm saying is maybe the Cards could have gone out and gotten Wade Phillips, a proven experienced DC. Horton is a rookie coming into a very difficult situation. He is learning on the job. Maybe with this group and the circumstances this year it is the perfect time to let him learn.

But keep this in mind. He is now our 3rd DC under Whiz. At what point do we place blame on the system? At what point do we blame the scouting staff and the front office for not getting the right personnel? At what point do we say, "You know what? Joey Porter simply cannot be asked to drop into coverage"?

At what point? Oh I think some of us started sometime around 1974.
 
Top