Why Signing Richie Sexson Is A Bad Idea

Djaughe

___________________
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Posts
27,756
Reaction score
4
Interesting post from a Seattle Board...

As with playing the popular work time-wasting game minesweeper, you can only float through the free agent market for so long. Eventually, you win — or you hit a mine.
If reports from multiple sources, including Fox and the Seattle P-I are to be believed, the Mariners just [url="http://msn.foxsports.com/story/3242270"]hit a big, 6-foot-8 mine named Richie Sexson.

I’m on the record in multiple places saying that signing Sexson is a bad idea, having placed him squarely on my not recommended list of free agents.

Let me go a step further this time: at best, this signing is merely an ill-advised waste of resources. At worst, it’s a complete disaster.

Contract details are not available at this time, so I’ll refrain from assuming the worst, but I’m wholeheartedly against guaranteeing Sexson any more than a single year. You might say this makes me ultra-conservative — but Arizona, at this point the only team with full information about his health, agreed.

Think about this: the Diamondbacks sent six players to the Brewers for Sexson one short year ago — then let him walk when he refused to take an incentive-laden deal — even though the deal offered $10 million in guaranteed money for next year. The Diamondbacks say their medical staff estimates a 10 percent chance his shoulder injury recurs, and as Will Carroll has written, surgery doesn’t prevent the injury from recurring.

Our A-B neighbor and resident medhead has written a lot about Sexson, and none of it is encouraging.

Check out this grisly description of the injury — the force of Sexson holding his swing up was so violent that the bone popped out of joint and was bruised upon re-attachment. Will speculates that Sexson’s long arms will continue to tax that shoulder during his swing.[/url]

Though Sexson’s injury wasn’t as severe as a similar malady suffered by Shawn Green, Carroll says that Green’s power outage after surgery could be a close parallel for Sexson. Given that all Richie Sexson does well is send baseballs a long way, that’s not a skill he can afford to have diminish.

If looking at Shawn Green’s hundred-point slugging percentage drop post-op isn’t enough to scare you, maybe Jon Weisman’s take on whether he’ll ever be the same will.

Why did the M’s go in this direction? The market for Carlos Delgado is heating up. Reports have Delgado seeking four years, $64 milion, or five years, $75 million. That’s too much, and I don’t blame the Mariners for shying away — but I also think, frankly, that the older Delgado will come closer to earning a four-year deal than Sexson would.

Health issues, while at the forefront of my concerns, aren’t the only reasons I’m against this signing. It uses prime dollars on a position where replacement talent is readily available and cheap, Sexson is a right-handed batter likely to adapt poorly to Safeco Field, and the M’s have to give up a draft pick as compensation since Arizona offered him arbitration.

Ironically, Sexson’s health issues might be the silver lining. The P-I and Ken Rosenthal are both reporting that the deal is pending a physical.

Like David Cameron, I am actively rooting for Sexson to fail that physical. Unless Sexson signed for the same deal he rejected in Arizona, I can’t imagine the financial outlay being worth the substantial risk.

Posted on Dec 13, 2004 at 1:51 AM


Why Signing Richie Sexson Is A Bad Idea
 

coyoteshockeyfan

Fool In The Rain
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Posts
8,942
Reaction score
405
Djaughe said:
Interesting post from a Seattle Board...

[/color][/size]

Why Signing Richie Sexson Is A Bad Idea

I was hoping a team in the bottom 15 (in the draft) signed him so we could get a first rounder rather than a second rounder.

As for Sexson himself, dont care, not our problem anymore. Dont let the door hit you on the way out. :wave:
 
Last edited:

Ryanwb

ASFN IDOL
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
35,576
Reaction score
6
Location
Mesa
Sexson has passed the physical and he and the Mariners have agreed to a contract in principle according to ESPN news
 

AZZenny

Registered User
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Posts
9,235
Reaction score
2
Location
Cave Creek
If they were in the bottom 15 we don't get the first round pick anyhow. Only after the first 15 does that kick in. Otherwise we get a sandwich pick and their second round. Nevertheless, we got CARLOS QUENTIN from a Seattle pick in 2003, thank you Greg Colbrunn (believe THAT!?) so it's all OK with me.

Those are all the same reasons I've stated here for being leery of signing Sexson. I'm fine with this - may be one of the few moves in the off season the DBacks make that will please me.
 

coyoteshockeyfan

Fool In The Rain
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Posts
8,942
Reaction score
405
AZZenny said:
If they were in the bottom 15 we don't get the first round pick anyhow. Only after the first 15 does that kick in. Otherwise we get a sandwich pick and their second round. Nevertheless, we got CARLOS QUENTIN from a Seattle pick in 2003, thank you Greg Colbrunn (believe THAT!?) so it's all OK with me.

I thought if a team signed Sexson was in the bottom fifteen in the draft (like, say, the Yankees), that we would get their 1st plus a supplemental, but if the were in the top fifteen in the draft (like the Mariners), that we would get a supplemental plus a 2nd round pick. Is that right?
 

AZZenny

Registered User
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Posts
9,235
Reaction score
2
Location
Cave Creek
LOL - depends if one is standing on one's head re: top or bottom. I meant if you are among the first 15 pickers, you can't lose your 1st round pick; if you're in the second 15, you can.
 

coyoteshockeyfan

Fool In The Rain
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Posts
8,942
Reaction score
405
AZZenny said:
LOL - depends if one is standing on one's head re: top or bottom. I meant if you are among the first 15 pickers, you can't lose your 1st round pick; if you're in the second 15, you can.

Yeah, I just realized that, sorry for the miscommunication. I should have specified that I meant "bottom" meaning "bottom in the draft" rather than "bottom in the standings." :thumbup:
 

Evil Ash

Henchman Supreme
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Posts
9,692
Reaction score
1,850
Location
On a flying cocoon
Ryanwb said:
Sexson has passed the physical and he and the Mariners have agreed to a contract in principle according to ESPN news

at around 4 yrs @ $48 million :shock:

Good Lord, Glaus seems like a bargain at this point (and IMO a better player ... I didn't mention him at the start of FA because I thought we had no shot at getting him)
 
Top