i'd take ant over haliburtonIf it's any consolation, at least 10 teams are regretting their choice on passing him up - the only pick that makes sense over him is Ant at #1. And time will tell if even that was a mistake.
And if they had actually made any effort at ALL to develop Smith, you could've at least made a concession for that. Just the stupidest front office ever under James Jones.
The nobodies won with team ball. That's a great story.
Yup. I immediately went there for post-game and within two minutes turned it off.Man ESPN has gone downhill so fast. That’s was a lukewarm production at best for an all time 4th qtr.
I agree. It wasn't like game one in NY where the Knicks got complacent and blew it.If I had to blame anybody I'd blame the OKC coach he went small down the stretch had both bigs on the bench. There was a couple of plays late in the game where not having a big in there might have played a role.
But honestly i don't think OKC lost it as much as Indiana took it. That 3 by Toppin was huge they were on the ropes until he hit that
Yeah, Monty seemed to mostly be inclined to playing guys he "liked" personally, for whatever reason, over guys who were actually performing. Not that he's the first or last coach to ever be that way, by a long stretch, but it was definitely a sign that he wasn't all that as a coach... as the Pistons later discovered and the Pelicans likely already knew. He clearly let grudges and blatant favoritism affect his coaching decisions, which is a sign of an inferior coach in my book.Remember he looked like a baller then Monty was just like nope back to the bench for you.
Looking back there were so many signs Monty just had no clue
And if they had actually made any effort at ALL to develop Smith, you could've at least made a concession for that. Just the stupidest front office ever under James Jones.
I left to move some furniture.
You know what I didn’t like at all.
They didn’t show the player introductions. It’s like ESPN forgets the players are the stars of the show I don’t want to see your on air talent at that moment
I hate James jones
That's pretty impressive, that that doesn't really tell me that the Pacers are good, but that bookmakers are morons.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
IMO, Jones has a worse rap here than he deserves, he wasn't a wizard but he wasn't a disaster. However, without question, his biggest mistake was screwing up that draft. Haliburton fell into our lap, after months of people hoping he would, he was right there... everyone thought we'd take him... and Jones got cute.
Maybe it's for the best. If we'd drafted Hali, then tossed him into the Durant trade (which seems likely given our total capitulation in every trade since Ishbia took over), then the pain of watching his evolution would be magnified 10 fold.
Moving furniture. That's innuendo, right?Holy crap what a game!
And I missed it! Honestly it got a little boring with OKC just winning most of the game and I left to move some furniture.
Yeah, Monty seemed to mostly be inclined to playing guys he "liked" personally, for whatever reason, over guys who were actually performing. Not that he's the first or last coach to ever be that way, by a long stretch, but it was definitely a sign that he wasn't all that as a coach... as the Pistons later discovered and the Pelicans likely already knew. He clearly let grudges and blatant favoritism affect his coaching decisions, which is a sign of an inferior coach in my book.
I don't think that's performance against odds, but performance against the win probability tracker in game. From ESPN https://www.espn.com/nba/game/_/gameId/401766122/pacers-thunderThat's pretty impressive, that that doesn't really tell me that the Pacers are good, but that bookmakers are morons.
ESPN AnalyticsI don't think that's performance against odds, but performance against the win probability tracker in game. From ESPN https://www.espn.com/nba/game/_/gameId/401766122/pacers-thunder
You must be registered for see images attach
I don't think that's performance against odds, but performance against the win probability tracker in game. From ESPN https://www.espn.com/nba/game/_/gameId/401766122/pacers-thunder
You must be registered for see images attach
Yeah, I'm curious if it's any more sophisticated than that (ie, home vs away, team records, playoffs vs regular season, etc), because there's been a LOT of wins these playoffs against low probability odds.It's just based on historical outcomes from that situation. When a team is up by 15 with 9:42 left in the 4th, it wins 97.9% of the time.