xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Suns updates and discussion for the 2020-21 season
- Thread starter Mainstreet
- Start date
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
GatorAZ
feed hopkins
I agree but they’d be even thinner than they were without Bell and Diaw... Sarver isn’t maxing Joe and Amare the same summer then giving Raja $25m either. You take Joe over them but there’d still be issues.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I think Tatum and Simmons have peaked to their abilities. Everyone else can improve in some areas.
Ouchie-Z-Clown
I'm better than Mulli!
Ayton conspicuous in absence.
Chaplin
Better off silent
In a top 10? You’re the only one that notices.
Chaplin
Better off silent
Sorry but Lamelo Ball is not better than anyone on that list.
Ouchie-Z-Clown
I'm better than Mulli!
Perhaps you missed the “rankings based on future potential” part of the post?
I think Ayton is conspicuous in his absence bc he’s already top 10 rebounds/game, top 15 effective shooting percentage, and top 20 in all kinds of crazy ranking analytics. So numbers wise, other than straight scoring (where he’s still scoring about 15pts/game - close to even with lamelo and simmons) he’s in good company and he’s been recognized as a very good defender.
mind you, I’m not saying I think he belongs there, I’m saying he is conspicuous in his absence, particularly bc this is supposed to be based in future potential and everyone keeps saying Ayton hasn’t fully tapped his potential yet. I think it’s an indictment on what people think will be his desire to achieve his full potential.
Chaplin
Better off silent
I still wouldn't put him any higher than 9 or 10 on such a list. The only guy on there that he could be potentially better than in Ben Simmons.
You make some good points about Ayton, but he just hasn't entered the popularity contest that is ESPN. Devin Booker for example should be higher in the list. If Mitchell is #4, Booker should at least be right there with him.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Posts
- 88,513
- Reaction score
- 61,163
disagree with Lamelo. He’s still very young and started the season slowly adjusting to the league, but his last two months in Feb/March, he was averaging 19/7/6 on 48% FG shooting and 43% 3 point shooting while making a huge contribution to the Hornets actually winning ball games. It’s a small sample size compared to the others, but he was flat out balling as a rookie and his size, speed, playmaking ability and surprisingly good shooting make him a tantalizing talent for the future.
also, I agree that Mitchell and Book are pretty equal, but I’d have them toward the bottom of the ten rather than at the top 4 as I don’t know how either guy gets much better at this point. Others are still young and athletic enough with holes in their games that can still be filled. I think Book and Mitch are close to finished products. Both very very good to borderline great finished products, but I don’t know how much higher those two guys ascend at this point.
Last edited:
GatorAZ
feed hopkins
Simmons yes. Tatum no.
I would argue you could replace 3-5 on that list with 8-10. Shai and Bam are going to be stars.
ESPN.com has the full article with the top 25 players under 25 listed. Ayton is #20 and Mikal Bridges is #17.
Espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/31198084/nba-best-25-25-ranking-young-stars-future-potential
JCSunsfan
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2002
- Posts
- 21,754
- Reaction score
- 6,139
Ho hum. Who on that list would you trade Book?
For me its Luka and Zion. That's it. Donovan is a coin flip so I keep Book. Even then, Zion makes me nervous. He is so close to injury IMO.
It's all opinions and mine is as good as theirs.
For me its Luka and Zion. That's it. Donovan is a coin flip so I keep Book. Even then, Zion makes me nervous. He is so close to injury IMO.
It's all opinions and mine is as good as theirs.
Ouchie-Z-Clown
I'm better than Mulli!
That makes a bit more sense. Interesting that bridges has already passed Ayton.
OP
OP
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 112,918
- Reaction score
- 52,355
I think the litmus test is trade value. I really like Bridges but Ayton has more trade value.
Ayton may fetch more in a trade but I'd trade him before Bridges.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 35,964
- Reaction score
- 14,745
We need both, I wouldn't trade either. Bridges gives you more of what he's capable of but Ayton is capable of quite a bit more. I love Booker but I could imagine a scenario where we moved him before I could envision a Bridges or Ayton trade.
OP
OP
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 112,918
- Reaction score
- 52,355
I'm not looking at the rankings as more than an educated guess.
Luka appears to be the clear number 1 today.
The Suns need to build around their young core of Booker, Bridges and Ayton.
JCSunsfan
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2002
- Posts
- 21,754
- Reaction score
- 6,139
Which, of course, means they need to be thinking about PG beyond CP3.
Just an off-the-wall thought. Cam Payne has really been looking good. Might he have a future as a starting pg? If so, we might have to battle off the suitors to sign him this summer.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Posts
- 88,513
- Reaction score
- 61,163
Cam Payne hasn’t looked really good in months. He ain’t the answer, IMO.
unfortunately, we passed on who probably would have been the perfect PG to take over for CP3 in the draft when we took Stix instead of Halliburton.
On the radio today they mentioned CP3 could opt out of his contract after this season. Maybe a smart play for him to leverage into a 3-4 year deal. Its possible the suns could need a point guard sooner. I thought he was locked in for two years.
Similar threads
