Phrazbit
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Posts
- 21,227
- Reaction score
- 12,766
He was impressive, but I'll always take his young-star-at-forward Suns predecessor, Antonio McDyess, over him. I trust *his* defense, and he was no Amare Stoudemire but no slouch in scoring.
As for the prospect of a defensive coach teaching Stoudemire to play defense: a question occurs that I think I had thought of before. Why did he never absorb good defense from his equally athletic frontcourt mate, Shawn Marion? Since I'm no fanboy of Shawn Marion, I have no problem entertaining the idea that Marion was over-rated; but to claim Marion wasn't a good defender is difficult to believe.
Bird was a very good defender. Nash didn't expel energy on defense most games. He also saw the game differently than others so he wasn't good at reading players and reacting. It's much more than being physically limited, which he was to some degree but not across the board. He was quick and had great acceleration also. He couldn't have done what he did offensively if he was as limited as some like to claim when looking back.
I love Nash, he's a top 3 Sun all time and I believe that's indisputable but he was an awful defender and a fair portion of that was his own fault. Defense isn't taught by teammates. It's a coaching thing. Sometimes a veteran player can help a young guy out, as we saw Chris Paul do here with many of the younger guys, but ultimately that doesn't fall on his shoulders. When two guys are closer in age also, like Stoudemire and Marion, it's not the same thing at all as Marion wasn't exactly a star when Amare came into his own. Stat leapfrogged Marion in the pecking order here.
Exactly, Bird was actually a very very good defender.
And Shawn Marion was the furthest thing from overrated, statistically, he is one of the best players in NBA history to not be in the hall of fame. If anything he is wildly underrated. Dude was a switch blade on defense, capable of very effectively guarding anything but a center, while also grabbing double digit rebounds AND scoring around 20 points per game without any plays being called for him, the majority of his points coming through transition hustle, slashing or offensive rebounds.
Now, with the way impact is more appreciated and calculated, Marion would be a far more acclaimed player. There isn't a player in the modern NBA that compares to him. Siakam maybe, but he was a much better player than Siakam.