Seattle Seahawks @ Arizona Cardinals Pre Game Thread. 09/22/25-09/24/25

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
70,393
Reaction score
41,251
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
Just thought I'd let you all know, I'm having heart surgery tomorrow. Not invasive, it's through an artery kinda thing. Patch a hole in ventricles. Should be all good. Prolly won't be able to watch the game. That should help!!
Take care and we'll be thinking of you :thumbup:

Wish you the best
 

daves

Keepin' it real!
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Posts
4,341
Reaction score
10,605
Location
Orange County, CA
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
So... Back on the topic of whether the Cardinals have changed their blocking schemes with Klayton Adams being replaced by Frye... can one of our resident O-line experts (@Harry , @BACH ?) tell us whether this was also the case last year?
 
Last edited:

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,204
Reaction score
23,464
Location
Modesto, California
Perfect! They’re giving up more than we are averaging!!! Bonanza!
well, one must also consider their opponents...have they played anybody that runs better than us?
I mean, we have not looked real good...but new orleans at least has shown they stuff the run pretty good...not surre on carolina.... maybe our run game isnt as bad as we thought but we have played a few top notch run stuffing teams....
in which case, we may run all over seattle?


a little research shows we have played the 14th, 15th, and 25th ranked rush defenses so far...
and we are the 4th ranked rushing defense per NFL dot com stats

the seahags are ranked 7th currently




but seattle has faced the 18th, 26th, and 31st ranked rushing offenses...we are 16th
so we are a better rushing team than anyone they have faced so far

based on those statistics we should exceed the average yards per rush that seattle has allowed so far
 
Last edited:

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,326
Reaction score
21,316
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Very true, but I also don't think they will need them. I said something like 24-3 above because I think our defense is decent enough not to get boat raced (this number excludes any defensive TDs).

But there's a decent chance the offense has a "screw it" game and Kyler takes the training wheels off (in which case there may very well be a defensive score for Seattle).

But I've realised that ultimately, I don't really care. Will be nice to win, but I'm fully expecting a loss.
Sadly the training wheels won’t come off until we are 14-17 pts down.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,326
Reaction score
21,316
Location
Plainfield, Il.

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,939
Reaction score
6,507
Location
Nashville TN.
well, one must also consider their opponents...have they played anybody that runs better than us?
I mean, we have not looked real good...but new orleans at least has shown they stuff the run pretty good...not surre on carolina.... maybe our run game isnt as bad as we thought but we have played a few top notch run stuffing teams....
in which case, we may run all over seattle?


a little research shows we have played the 14th, 15th, and 25th ranked rush defenses so far...
and we are the 4th ranked rushing defense per NFL dot com stats

the seahags are ranked 7th currently




but seattle has faced the 18th, 26th, and 31st ranked rushing offenses...we are 16th
so we are a better rushing team than anyone they have faced so far

based on those statistics we should exceed the average yards per rush that seattle has allowed so far
No Conner is huge. Need a physical back in a game like this.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,939
Reaction score
6,507
Location
Nashville TN.
Our secondary got worked on Sunday IMO, especially Max Melton. It really felt like Mac Jones could do whatever he wanted. The passes over the middle of the field were there whenever he wanted them.

Seems like the key to the game will be getting MHJ involved early, winning the turnover battle, and obviously if they can put pressure on Darnold that will bode well, but I’m not so sure about that last one since Rallis really only sends 4.
It was Clark and Burke who got worked. Melton played fine.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
101,303
Reaction score
54,214
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

I think that's because of Conner and we'll probably change it but not sure we have had time to put in much change.

I kind of expect we'll see less 3 TE I think they'll figure they have to open it up a bit without Conner
 

Dayman

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Posts
6,730
Reaction score
9,783
Location
Portland, Oregon
PFF grades for anything but O and D line you gotta take with a big grain of salt
Pro Football Reference has him giving up a 69% completion percentage and 8.7 yards/target for a passer rating of 95.6.

They also have him with a missed tackle % of 26.7, which is pretty brutal.
 

BritCard

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
25,553
Reaction score
48,323
Location
UK
So... Back on the topic of whether the Cardinals have changed their blocking schemes with Klayton Adams being replaced by Frye... can one of our resident O-line experts (@Harry , @BACH ?) tell us whether this was also the case last year?

Apparently we were majority gap scheme last year too so may just be teams expecting gap and adjusting to the tape.

We were 69% gap last year. We were 88% through the first 2 games so 80% now suggests we we ran much less gap vs the Niners.
 
Top