SoonerLou
ASFN Addict
Who should we want to win (or lose)?
I’m gonna say we need to root for rams just because we’ve already beat them. The packers hold a tie breaker with us due to them beating us.Who should we want to win (or lose)?
I’m gonna say we need to root for rams just because we’ve already beat them. The packers hold a tie breaker with us due to them beating us.
@ MIN, @ BAL, & SF is a crazy stretch. Good Lord.i think a Rams win would be best
the Rams have a tough schedule down the stretch
after going to GB:
Jacksonville at home
at Cards
SEA at home
at MIN
at BAL
SF at home
thats 5 challenging games out of the final 7
GB's schedule isnt a cake walk either:
after LA they have a bye, then its:
CHI at home
at BALT
CLE at home
MIN at home
finish at DET
Correct answer... tough call on which team I'd rather see win without the tie. Rams win would benefit us in terms of not ending in a tie w/ the Packers where they own the tie-breaker and gives us a clearer path to the #1 seed, but then the Rams winning and beating us the following week erases at least the head-to-head tiebreaker and puts us in jeopardy of not winning the division/even hosting a playoff game. Rams win vs Packers and losing vs us is the ideal scenario, but I'm not sure I'd take the first part without knowing the second part.A tie hurts both team and 10 extra minutes has sometimes hurt the following week though the Packers have a bye.
And a tie would take some wind out of both team's sails.
@ MIN, @ BAL, & SF is a crazy stretch. Good Lord.
I’m kind of with you, but that Robert Woods injury is one I think you’re underestimating & they weirdly seem more predictable with Stafford back there as opposed to Goff.Give me Green Bay. I’m still not sold the Rams are frauds and not capable of going on a run. I’ll take the division.
yep that was a costly game for the packersRodgers dealing with severe toe issues & Packers just lost LG due to ACL tear.
yep that was a costly game for the packers