PFF on headcoaches

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,002
Reaction score
11,433
Location
York, PA
Tomlin is a weird case cause he’s clearly not a bad HC, hence by the lack of losing seasons, but Pittsburgh hasn’t really done anything in over 10 years & they have had some really bad playoff losses(Tebow, Bortles) since then.
Tomlin is an average HC because he’s been outcoached by the superior teams his entire tenure.
 
OP
OP
football karma

football karma

Happy in the pretense of knowledge
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
14,857
Reaction score
13,096
Tomlin is a tough call-- no question a really good coach

i think he has benefitted from a top 5 NFL drafting front office and getting an established top 10 QB (back in the day).

thats a pretty good recipe for success
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
36,933
Reaction score
26,699
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Tomlin is an average HC because he’s been outcoached by the superior teams his entire tenure.

Tomlin is a tough call-- no question a really good coach

i think he has benefitted from a top 5 NFL drafting front office and getting an established top 10 QB (back in the day).

thats a pretty good recipe for success
Yo... Dude has gone 15 years without once having a losing record. Only Bill Belicheck has a similar record.

It takes some pretty profound myopia driven by [who knows what] to assert that he's an "average head coach."
 
OP
OP
football karma

football karma

Happy in the pretense of knowledge
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
14,857
Reaction score
13,096
Yo... Dude has gone 15 years without once having a losing record. Only Bill Belicheck has a similar record.

It takes some pretty profound myopia driven by [who knows what] to assert that he's an "average head coach."
dont throw me in there

really good head coach + good FO + good QB is what you want
 
OP
OP
football karma

football karma

Happy in the pretense of knowledge
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
14,857
Reaction score
13,096
offhand observation on the analytics sites: PFF and FO

FO's analytics stuff is generally favorable on the Cards than their editorial stuff

PFFs analytics stuff is down on the Cards, but the editorial stuff is more favorable
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,002
Reaction score
11,433
Location
York, PA
Yo... Dude has gone 15 years without once having a losing record. Only Bill Belicheck has a similar record.

It takes some pretty profound myopia driven by [who knows what] to assert that he's an "average head coach."
He's taken advantage of being in the same division with 2 of the crappiest teams in the NFL the past decade (Browns & Bengals). Dude cannot beat the better teams & better HC's, so yes, at best, he's an average to above average NFL HC. I live in Steeler country & NO ONE would argue the point I'm making. If he was in the NFCW, he'd have many losing records.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,461
Reaction score
16,602
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Yo... Dude has gone 15 years without once having a losing record. Only Bill Belicheck has a similar record.

It takes some pretty profound myopia driven by [who knows what] to assert that he's an "average head coach."
This. Some need to stop piling on Tomlin because they simply hate the Steelers, or hating those that have success and we have not
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
36,933
Reaction score
26,699
Location
Gilbert, AZ
He's taken advantage of being in the same division with 2 of the crappiest teams in the NFL the past decade (Browns & Bengals). Dude cannot beat the better teams & better HC's, so yes, at best, he's an average to above average NFL HC. I live in Steeler country & NO ONE would argue the point I'm making. If he was in the NFCW, he'd have many losing records.
Yinzers have had complicated feelings about Mike Tomlin for his entire time there for reasons (one suspects) that are very unrelated to his on-field performance.

Tomlin is a hall of fame head coach and one of the five best in the league. If Steeltown can’t embrace him it says more about those fans than it does about Tomlin.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,128
Reaction score
6,764
Location
Chandler
The funny thing about this board, is you consistently see posters bemoan the lack of talent, "oh Keim totally sucks, the team lacks talent all through out," and then many posters talk about how terrible Kingsbury is....and then the cherry on top is they will also say that Kyler isn't the guy either.

So if you read some of these posters (not naming names) the team is essentially a 4 win team and everyone should be fired and Kyler should be traded

And yet, at one point the Cardinals were 10-2 and the best team in the NFL for essentially 6-7 weeks of the season, if not longer.

I personally think the team has some decent talent, Kingsbury is a pretty good coach when his offense is humming, and Kyler is a great QB when players around him can win some battles and get open.
For the first 13 weeks they had the best record. ;)
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,128
Reaction score
6,764
Location
Chandler
This is a great point. I'm guessing PFF would argue that their grades measure performance, not talent. And that the quality of the HC effects that performance.

Affect & effect. There is a difference. Just bustin your British huevos Brit. ;)
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,002
Reaction score
11,433
Location
York, PA
This. Some need to stop piling on Tomlin because they simply hate the Steelers, or hating those that have success and we have not
Take it from someone surrounded by Steeler fans, Tomlin is viewed at best as a slightly above average HC. What the Steelers have is a phenomenal organization & fan base. Chuck Noll was a great HC. Cowher was average, as is Tomlin.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,128
Reaction score
6,764
Location
Chandler
Yeah, we shouldn't even be putting Kliffy in the same stadium.
True, KK is better. ;) :cheers:

Increased the number of wins by 3 each year. On projection to win 14 this year. Won 2 games with Colt McCoy at qb with one against the NFC runner up SF Niners. Also minus D-Hop. Kliff has done a pretty darn good job with the Cards. Especially learning on the fly since he had no previous NFL experience coaching.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
38,196
Reaction score
20,965
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Take it from someone surrounded by Steeler fans, Tomlin is viewed at best as a slightly above average HC. What the Steelers have is a phenomenal organization & fan base. Chuck Noll was a great HC. Cowher was average, as is Tomlin.
I'm surrounded by Stiller fans too, and there are two segments of the fan base. Three, I suppose. There's a small segment of blind Tomlin loyalists. There's a very vocal minority that think he's overrated or JAG at coach. Most of the fans around here seem to think he's pretty damn good and an important cog in (what has been) a great organization. With Colbert's retirement, and the younger players, the culture might erode. Then again, look at what he did with Antonio Brown. Everyone thought he was too indulgent, babied him too much, etc. Sure, he had behavior problems in Pittsburgh, but he exploded after he left. Tomlin got a lot of credit after that.

Is he the perfect coach? No. But to go that long without a losing season, regardless of how good your organization is, is astounding.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,461
Reaction score
16,602
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Take it from someone surrounded by Steeler fans, Tomlin is viewed at best as a slightly above average HC. What the Steelers have is a phenomenal organization & fan base. Chuck Noll was a great HC. Cowher was average, as is Tomlin.
The Steelers have a storied history, their fans expect more from their team after winning Super Bowls and there is a higher criteria for excellence. Tomlin is far above average, and just as good, if not better than Bruce Arians... Steeler fans are so spoiled, they make it look like Tomlin is Marvin Lewis who is actually average lol
 

HairZach

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
1,196
Reaction score
2,298
Location
VA
He's taken advantage of being in the same division with 2 of the crappiest teams in the NFL the past decade (Browns & Bengals). Dude cannot beat the better teams & better HC's, so yes, at best, he's an average to above average NFL HC. I live in Steeler country & NO ONE would argue the point I'm making. If he was in the NFCW, he'd have many losing records.
Steelers fans thinking Tomlin average to above average is a result of the Brady/Belichick regime warping people's perspective on what success is.

This PFF list is a fun attempt to model the "head coach variable" in football. I don't fully understand the model but from the results it looks like PFF thinks our roster (for the majority of Kliff's tenure at least) is hot garbage that is massively elevated by the coaching staff.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
21,114
Reaction score
37,273
Location
UK
I'm surrounded by Stiller fans too, and there are two segments of the fan base. Three, I suppose. There's a small segment of blind Tomlin loyalists. There's a very vocal minority that think he's overrated or JAG at coach. Most of the fans around here seem to think he's pretty damn good and an important cog in (what has been) a great organization. With Colbert's retirement, and the younger players, the culture might erode. Then again, look at what he did with Antonio Brown. Everyone thought he was too indulgent, babied him too much, etc. Sure, he had behavior problems in Pittsburgh, but he exploded after he left. Tomlin got a lot of credit after that.

Is he the perfect coach? No. But to go that long without a losing season, regardless of how good your organization is, is astounding.

Look at the last few years of Steelers football and tell me what stars they had on that team? After peak Lev Bell and AB (which ended in 2017 and 2018) he's been working with a QB well passed his prime, an ever declining O line, a good but not fantastic bunch of WRs, a defensive backfield of good but not great players. All the star power has really been on the D line.

The team he started 11-0 with in 2020 wasn't anywhere near a 11-0 team if you look at that roster.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
38,196
Reaction score
20,965
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Look at the last few years of Steelers football and tell me what stars they had on that team? After peak Lev Bell and AB (which ended in 2017 and 2018) he's been working with a QB well passed his prime, an ever declining O line, a good but not fantastic bunch of WRs, a defensive backfield of good but not great players. All the star power has really been on the D line.

The team he started 11-0 with in 2020 wasn't anywhere near a 11-0 team if you look at that roster.
Preaching to the choir, @BritCard. I remember talking to Stillers fans who were just waiting for the collapse and weren't at all surprised they lost to Cleveland in the playoffs.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
19,669
Reaction score
10,458
Hmm...

Does this chart only track the first 8-10 games?

I guess I need to stop quoting PFF when debating the NFL.

Yeesh.

Maybe I am being to harsh. If there is one coach that KK reminds me of, it is Andy Reid, not the Chiefs version, but the one in Philly, who's teams always were compelling, played exciting games... and who famously couldn't manage fourth quarters and had some massive collapses. Hopefully KK adjusts quicker than Andy did.

If he could also learn Philly Andy's ability to bamboozle teams into trading 1st and 2nd day picks for his crappy back up players who looked good in part of 1 or 2 games... that would be great.
 
Last edited:

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
21,114
Reaction score
37,273
Location
UK
I'll say this about Kliff. He has the potential to be a very good HC and I don't mind they extended him.

There are some thing he is very good at, some things he has improved on a great deal but still has some work to do, and some holes he really needs to fix. You can't fault his work rate.

His biggest issues for me are his late season collapses, his lack of a plan B when plan A isn't working, his over simplistic route concepts and his apparent lack of any involvement in the defense. I think the HC should be setting the standards and scheme on both sides of the ball. If Vance goes and we need a new DC what's he going to do? Change the whole D scheme? Adopt Vance's philosophy as his own without fully comprehending it? I also wish he would bring in an OC like Jim Caldwell.

But overall he's improved enough to be given more time. I'm not one for chopping and changing HC's. It more often leads to things getting worse, not better, especially for a franchise that doesn't attract top candidates.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
45,778
Reaction score
11,053
You didn't challenge my opinion. You invented that I didn't read it and rushed to judgement because Kliff was 4th.
Still can't admit it I see.
 

Zalixar

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
2,207
Reaction score
3,949
Location
OC
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

I know it doesn't factor in trades or FA, but drafting has to improve.

Edit: Redundancy
 
Last edited:

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
537,151
Posts
5,265,623
Members
6,275
Latest member
Beagleperson
Top