Originally posted by Stout
Well, Graves can't have his cake and eat it too.
If he's going to hardball them on one issue he needs to be flexible on another. That's what negotiation is all about. If he wants to force the agent into a longer contract, he should be open to voidables. On the flip side, if the agent wants to get the deal done, he'll have to accept the longer contract while getting something in voidables.
Bottom line: If Graves says, 'long contract, no voidables, suck it up', he's wrong. If the agent says, 'shorter contract or no contract', he's wrong.
At least that's my opinion. At the moment. With the facts we currently have.