OTAs start today for the Arizona Cardinals. Part Three!

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,373
Reaction score
56,238
Location
Colorado
Kyle Odegard
@Kyle_Odegard
·
40m
Don’t know the exact reason for the absence, but I’ve been hearing for awhile that Josh Sweat is not particularly happy in AZ
Yeah…not new. Pretty sure he came to AZ due to Gannon. The best player coming into the season disengaged would be a great tone setter.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
23,968
Reaction score
24,689
Location
Modesto, California
if brissett is playing hardball and asking for a longer contract then i like what monti is doing - things is we don't know - we don't know if brissett just wants more money for this year or if he wants to be here beyond this year

i'd be blaming monti if i knew more

i asked an unanswered question last week

did brissett demand more money before or after we drafted beck?

if brissett demanded (i say demanded because he's holding out and not showing up) more money before the draft then yes - monti should have locked him up (unless brissett wants an extension)

if brissett demanded more money after the draft then there's not much monti could have done - not only that but the draft shouldn't have changed anything regarding brissett- if that's the case im glad monti isn't worried about re-signing brissett

i hope he isn't worried about re-signing brissett - personally - i think we know exactly who brissett is and why he's important to this team - but also why he can't be the future

brissett's angle is obvious - he fixed the offense - played really well without a running game or a defense - brissett doesn't feel he went 1-11 he thinks the cardinals went 1-11 and he might be right but if i'm monti ossenfort idgaf

if im monti ossenfort i'm not extending brissett's contract - i might pay him more for this upcoming season but i'm not talking extension until i know where this club is at the end of the year

i'm not extending brissett until i have to - truth is i don't have to - i already have a minshew who's just as good and a rookie qb i need to see at some point during this year

but either way - we don't need jacoby brissett - jacoby brissett needs us and the $5 million dollars he's due - i bet he shows up to collect that check
He asked before the draft
 

phillycard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
8,215
Reaction score
6,240
Location
The 215
Casuals aren’t paying attention at all
A lot of those too. LOL. Funny how people with little to no investment in the plight of the Arizona Cardinals have so much to say on what we do. In my heart of heart, I dream of us shutting everyone up, and winning it all, but then I wake up and get ready for work.
 

602 Native

ASFN Addict
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
5,989
Reaction score
11,037
Location
Gilbert
Square profile picture
SleeperCardinals

@SleeperAZCards
·
1h
"These guys have been in this system. It is a unique system. It is tough to prepare for. Nick cares so much about this; he's as hard on himself as anybody, which is all you want in a coach."

HC Mike LaFleur on why he retained DC Nick Rallis.
Then can we put to bed the notion that Nick Rallis didn’t control the defense last year because everything that was just stated above says he controlled the defense last year.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
14,972
Reaction score
13,039
For the fan base, it's all about optics. I for one don't mind him getting a raise. In totality when you look at the situation it's warranted. I just don't view it in the same lens as a Burrows, Jackson, Allen type of hold out. Give my man a few more coins, but don't pay him like we have no other options. This whole ordeal just makes me shake my head even more at this front office if I'm being honest.
What did the front office do wrong?

They don't want to pay him big money because he is not a long term option, we won't be that good this year, and it might even be in our best interests to start the rookie.

There was no other QB to obtain unless you believe Malik Willis is the answer - which is at best a very risky gamble.

If I am the Cards I tell him we will go up to 12 million or something like that, but that's it. That shows some acknowledgement he has earned a raise, but it also tells him the way we view him, as nothing more than a very short term stop gap, and it is a stop gap we will just bypass altogether if it costs more than that.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
33,373
Reaction score
56,238
Location
Colorado
What did the front office do wrong?

They don't want to pay him big money because he is not a long term option, we won't be that good this year, and it might even be in our best interests to start the rookie.

There was no other QB to obtain unless you believe Malik Willis is the answer - which is at best a very risky gamble.

If I am the Cards I tell him we will go up to 12 million or something like that, but that's it. That shows some acknowledgement he has earned a raise, but it also tells him the way we view him, as nothing more than a very short term stop gap, and it is a stop gap we will just bypass altogether if it costs more than that.
They didn't cut or pay him after the draft. There seems to have been no foresight that this would be an issue which they are paid to have. We are not likely going to know numbers but the Cardinals also have zero benefit of doubt in terms of operating based on their history of dysfunction.

You could argue that as soon as they hung up his picture in the building, they also could have stated (publicly) they were reaching out to him to discuss his contract and increase it to reflect a starter. That would have enabled them to get ahead of this and at least appear that they recognize his contract does not reflect a player entering the season as the starting QB. Also, if they did this and then found Brissett's demands unreasonable, they could have released him after the draft with little to no fanfare. Basically, "we have been unable to jointly agree on an increase in Jacoby's salary, and have decided to let him pursue other opportunities".

None of that is high level people management.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,061
Reaction score
42,375
Location
Gilbert, AZ
What did the front office do wrong?

They don't want to pay him big money because he is not a long term option, we won't be that good this year, and it might even be in our best interests to start the rookie.

There was no other QB to obtain unless you believe Malik Willis is the answer - which is at best a very risky gamble.

If I am the Cards I tell him we will go up to 12 million or something like that, but that's it. That shows some acknowledgement he has earned a raise, but it also tells him the way we view him, as nothing more than a very short term stop gap, and it is a stop gap we will just bypass altogether if it costs more than that.
The assumption that Brissett is asking for “big money” or an extension is an internal meme unfounded by anything external.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,061
Reaction score
42,375
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Yeah, his "camp" has been really quiet in all of this, you could say. :D
I guess? They’ve been more transparent than anyone. They said that Monti had not talked to him about Brissett’s role following the coaching change. They said that Brissett was seeking a larger guarantee more in line with his starting role.

The only leverage Brissett’s team has is his presence at voluntary work and his ability to embarrass the Cards front office publicly.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
79,606
Reaction score
35,165
Location
Killjoy Central
I guess? They’ve been more transparent than anyone. They said that Monti had not talked to him about Brissett’s role following the coaching change. They said that Brissett was seeking a larger guarantee more in line with his starting role.

The only leverage Brissett’s team has is his presence at voluntary work and his ability to embarrass the Cards front office publicly.
The team should have just ended all of this by saying there are three QBs on the roster (not counting Slovis) and in the off-season there would be a true QB competition. Problem solved.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,061
Reaction score
42,375
Location
Gilbert, AZ
The team should have just ended all of this by saying there are three QBs on the roster (not counting Slovis) and in the off-season there would be a true QB competition. Problem solved.
Hard to tell that to the players who just got 1000 yard seasons with Brissett.

Hard to do that while also hanging a mural of one of those three at HQ.

Boobs in leadership created their own problem. Maybe they were bored with standard failure and wanted to give Coach Mike something embarrassing to no-comment on for a few weeks.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
22,341
Reaction score
19,072
Location
Chandler, Az
I hate this time of year in the NFL. Nothing to talk about but stupid stuff.

They should change the NFL draft to an old school 8 hour per pick email style of draft like I used to do in my old FFL back in the day to stretch it out over a month. :cool:
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,061
Reaction score
42,375
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I hate this time of year in the NFL. Nothing to talk about but stupid stuff.

They should change the NFL draft to an old school 8 hour per pick email style of draft like I used to do in my old FFL back in the day to stretch it out over a month. :cool:
Yup once OTAs are over we’re see in for two months of Rankings.
 
Top