Miles Bridges meets the press today. 07/22/26

leclerc

The smooth operator
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Posts
3,360
Reaction score
2,383
Location
Norway
It's easy to second guess the trade, but we absolutely needed a starting PF. Maybe there were better options and maybe there weren't. Had we gone into this season without a starting PF we'd be ripping the team for doing nothing.

I for one like the aggressiveness of management to take risks, and they've shown the ability to correct mistakes, see Durant.
I'm not 100% here because they're still trading away future lottery balls for players that are underwhelming (when it comes to wins). Seems like more of the same. But the drafting seems better. And as mentioned, they addressed an obvious weakness. I'm optimistic. Life is too short.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
38,545
Reaction score
19,568
I'm not 100% here because they're still trading away future lottery balls for players that are underwhelming (when it comes to wins). Seems like more of the same. But the drafting seems better. And as mentioned, they addressed an obvious weakness. I'm optimistic. Life is too short.
Much of the value of that trade came from cleaning up our cap situation. I don't know if it was a fair trade or not but, if not, I don't think it was off by much considering we picked up a first and a second in the deal.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
23,144
Reaction score
7,842
Much of the value of that trade came from cleaning up our cap situation. I don't know if it was a fair trade or not but, if not, I don't think it was off by much considering we picked up a first and a second in the deal.
Yeah, a worse first rounder, but still it’s a first round pick. And we have been making pretty good use of those so far
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
38,545
Reaction score
19,568
Yeah, a worse first rounder, but still it’s a first round pick. And we have been making pretty good use of those so far
Yeah it's about as low valued as a first can be but it is a first and we regain some flexibility too.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,433
Reaction score
16,676
Location
Laveen, AZ
It's always been the team taking on more salary usually gets compensated by a better first round pick. I wasn't surprised we sent a first rounder, but rather there was no protection on it at all.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
38,545
Reaction score
19,568
Also Bridges was a first round pick. I believe number 8.
He was 12th but he was often mentioned as a top 10 probable. Regardless, I think we got reasonable value out of the deal. I guess in some ways we probably lost the trade but all told, we cleared enough salary to bring back several players and that's a part of the equation too.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,433
Reaction score
16,676
Location
Laveen, AZ
He was 12th but he was often mentioned as a top 10 probable. Regardless, I think we got reasonable value out of the deal. I guess in some ways we probably lost the trade but all told, we cleared enough salary to bring back several players and that's a part of the equation too.
Also we got younger.

I kinda wonder if we are trying to do the reversal trend on the NBA. Teams used to have a lot of bruisers. Then the three point shot started taking over, so teams were going taller, skinnier, and more perimeter oriented. Now it seems we are going back to adding bruisers to our team. Maybe we take advantage and rough up some teams maybe like those old Pistons teams. Just seem intentional we bring in Brooks, who is a bully. Now we bring in Bridges. Koa Peat is physical too. Seems like we are trying to bulk up a bit.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,433
Reaction score
16,676
Location
Laveen, AZ
Half this boatd wanted to trade both Grayson and Royce and now that we have we lost the trade. All because of a draft pick that doesn't convey for 7 years.
Listened to a podcaster, plus the sports radio on 98.7, and most of the attitude is over the pick at the end of the day. Starts off with being angry at bringing in Bridges for his off court stuff. But when people are really questioned is the pick, The anger is unprotected picks are for guys that move the needle. Big name guys. Most people don't think Bridges warrants an unprotected pick. The thought is, if we are going to give out unprotected picks, it should be for a better player.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
134,326
Reaction score
74,520
Listened to a podcaster, plus the sports radio on 98.7, and most of the attitude is over the pick at the end of the day. Starts off with being angry at bringing in Bridges for his off court stuff. But when people are really questioned is the pick, The anger is unprotected picks are for guys that move the needle. Big name guys. Most people don't think Bridges warrants an unprotected pick. The thought is, if we are going to give out unprotected picks, it should be for a better player.

For big name players like Durant?

I'm so tired of the self righteous media beating this guy up, especially when they live in glass houses.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,433
Reaction score
16,676
Location
Laveen, AZ
Check this out:

You must be registered for see images attach


I didn't know he ranked that high in scoring and rebounding.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
38,545
Reaction score
19,568
Check this out:

You must be registered for see images attach


I didn't know he ranked that high in scoring and rebounding.
I haven't followed him closely but I have heard the rumblings through the years about his efficiency and high usage rate. Still, there are no perfect players and while he might not be a star, he draws defensive attention like one.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
23,144
Reaction score
7,842
Listened to a podcaster, plus the sports radio on 98.7, and most of the attitude is over the pick at the end of the day. Starts off with being angry at bringing in Bridges for his off court stuff. But when people are really questioned is the pick, The anger is unprotected picks are for guys that move the needle. Big name guys. Most people don't think Bridges warrants an unprotected pick. The thought is, if we are going to give out unprotected picks, it should be for a better player.
The Suns have never had the sense to protect any pick. All the other teams do and we NEVER have, no matter which GM or owner is involved. I am not going to get too worked up about it, but top 3 protection would have been reasonable.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
23,144
Reaction score
7,842
I haven't followed him closely but I have heard the rumblings through the years about his efficiency and high usage rate. Still, there are no perfect players and while he might not be a star, he draws defensive attention like one.
He’s an OK player. I wonder what a player like Royce would produce given the same usage. If Miles and Kennard end up producing the same as Grayson and Royce, then we swapped first round picks for a significant cap savings. Fans don’t like it, but I get it.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
98,036
Reaction score
83,329
For big name players like Durant?

I'm so tired of the self righteous media beating this guy up, especially when they live in glass houses.
There’s only one person in this situation who beat any one up… it was Brdidges and he BEAT UP A WONAN.

Choosing to bash the media while giving a woman beater a free pass just because he now wears a jersey of a team you cheer for bewilders me to no end. If you want the player, you should be ready to also accept that his baggage is coming with him.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
49,163
Reaction score
20,629
Location
Round Rock, TX
He’s an OK player. I wonder what a player like Royce would produce given the same usage. If Miles and Kennard end up producing the same as Grayson and Royce, then we swapped first round picks for a significant cap savings. Fans don’t like it, but I get it.
Royce was a starter. How much more usage did you want him to have? He was a 3-point chucker with a little bit of defensive unicorn mixed in. I liked him, but that's all he was and he was never going to be better than that.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
49,163
Reaction score
20,629
Location
Round Rock, TX
There’s only one person in this situation who beat any one up… it was Brdidges and he BEAT UP A WONAN.

Choosing to bash the media while giving a woman beater a free pass just because he now wears a jersey of a team you cheer for bewilders me to no end. If you want the player, you should be ready to also accept that his baggage is coming with him.
This is such a weird narrative. He's did scummy things in his past, no question there, but you are speaking in absolutes. Who is giving him a free pass?

It sucks because every time we talk about this team on the court, someone like you will ALWAYS bring up the whataboutism that he had a bad past off the court. Always.

"Good game by Bridges at least."
"But he was a wife beater, stop supporting a wife beater!"
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
23,144
Reaction score
7,842
Royce was a starter. How much more usage did you want him to have? He was a 3-point chucker with a little bit of defensive unicorn mixed in. I liked him, but that's all he was and he was never going to be better than that.
You missed my point completely.

I didnt WANT Royce to have more usage, which has more to do with role on the floor than minutes. My point that even marginal players can score more and look better when they are the lead player for their team on the floor—even a player like Royce.

I am hoping that is not the case with Miles—with his usage in Charlotte. One of the worst things in the world is to get a player who thinks he is better than he is.

The famous quote from Danny Ainge after trading for Luc Longlely. “I listened to him after he got here and I thought, “oh no! We are in trouble. He thinks he is good.’”
 
Last edited:

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
49,163
Reaction score
20,629
Location
Round Rock, TX
You missed my point completely.

I didnt WANT Royce to have more usage, which has more to do with role on the floor than minutes. My point that even marginal players can score more and look better when they are the lead player for their team on the floor—even a player like Royce.

I am hoping that is not the case with Miles—with his usage in Charlotte. One of the worst things in the world is to get a player who thinks he is better than he is.

The famous quote from Danny Ainge after trading for Luc Longlely. “I listened to him after he got here and I thought, “oh no! We are in trouble. He thinks he is good.’”
What an odd thing to say. The statistics back up that he is a decent starting-level power forward in the league. That isn't the same for Royce. If it was a single half- or even full season of good production, I'd say sure, you probably have a point. But he's been pretty consistent in his production over the past few years. Yes, on a bad team, but we aren't exactly barn burners at this point either.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
27,433
Reaction score
16,676
Location
Laveen, AZ
One of the quotes by Bridges no one in the media has written about that I have seen, is Miles Bridges and his thoughts on Coach Ott. They want to develpop Bridges rebounding and defense. Bridges said that's Ott's focus for him. Bridges said Ott and him have or will watch video together. That part I didn't quite catch. Interesting, Coach Ott already has laid out a plan for personal development for Bridges and communicated it to him already.
 
Top