Matt Flynn likely NOT to be franchised

sportznutt

Canadian Card
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
3,334
Reaction score
177
Citing league sources, ESPN's Adam Schefter reports that the Packers are "unlikely" to place the franchise tag on impending free agent Matt Flynn.

The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel and SI's Peter King had previously suggested that franchising Flynn would at least be a consideration for the Packers, in an effort to pull a sign-and-trade deal. Instead, Green Bay's franchise tag figures to be used on Jermichael Finley. This would make Flynn easier for teams like the Seahawks and Redskins to acquire. He isn't going to cost a draft pick.

rotoworld
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
11,952
Reaction score
4,832
Location
Nashville TN.
With Kolb's concussion issues I would be all for seriously considering Flynn and cutting our losses with Kolb.
 
Last edited:

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,664
Location
CA
With Kolb's concussion issues I would be all for seriously comsidering Flynn and cutting our losses with Kolb.
icon14.gif
 

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
13,894
Reaction score
3,925
Location
annapolis, md
Flynn will be a Redskin, plain and simple IMO. I expect them to trade down from 6 to accumulate much needed extra picks. Their line is awful at best and they're in desperate need for a #1 WR
 

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
Flynn will be a Redskin, plain and simple IMO. I expect them to trade down from 6 to accumulate much needed extra picks. Their line is awful at best and they're in desperate need for a #1 WR

I also fully expect Seattle to be in play for him.
 

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
The guy has 1 good game and all of a sudden he's the 2nd coming? Wow.

2 good games...

He's not the second coming, but outside of Luck and Griffin, hes likely the best QB available. With the mentorship he's got and on the job "training," a team in dire need of a QB like Washington might not be so ill suited to pick him up.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
14
Location
The Aventine
Was there serious discussion of Flynn getting the franchise tag? That would be bizarre--it would mean the a backup was getting an average of the top 5 QB salaries.
 

Shane

Current STAR
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
66,074
Reaction score
32,047
Location
Las Vegas
Was there serious discussion of Flynn getting the franchise tag? That would be bizarre--it would mean the a backup was getting an average of the top 5 QB salaries.

Nope. Just a comment by Peter king!
 

Timm Rosenbach

Bye Bye DJ
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Posts
6,490
Reaction score
4,331
Location
Tucson
Kolb should have warned us about "system" QB's with little tape to judge

Let someone else roll the dice on this gamble
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
26,733
Reaction score
35,046
Location
Colorado
Was there serious discussion of Flynn getting the franchise tag? That would be bizarre--it would mean the a backup was getting an average of the top 5 QB salaries.

Not by any informed individuals. Didn't make any sense.
 

SuperSpck

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Posts
7,977
Reaction score
15
Location
Iowa
The Packers usually have cap room, so using the tag wouldn't be crippling.
There are teams out there that need a QB bad enough to give up for it, most likely.
It'd a bigger gamble then using it on Finley, but with a bigger reward.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
26,733
Reaction score
35,046
Location
Colorado
The Packers usually have cap room, so using the tag wouldn't be crippling.
There are teams out there that need a QB bad enough to give up for it, most likely.
It'd a bigger gamble then using it on Finley, but with a bigger reward.

Finley could cost around 5.5 million while Flynn would cost over 10 million. Also, why would a team pay two firsts to match, when they could let the Packers just eat +10 million? Flynn has potential, and teams will be willing to gamble on it, but not at those dollars and the loss of a high pick. Unlike the Eagles last year, the Packers have very little leverage in this.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
19,623
Reaction score
10,406
Was there serious discussion of Flynn getting the franchise tag? That would be bizarre--it would mean the a backup was getting an average of the top 5 QB salaries.

New England did it after Matt Cassell's big year. But it was only done to allow them to trade him, he never actually got paid through the franchise tag because Kansas City signed him to a long term deal.

So there was some precedence, but Green Bay has a lot of talent they need to retain that are bigger priorities.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,181
Reaction score
6,667
Wondering if he did get tagged, would his salary be greater than Rodgers's? It would be hilarious if it was. I have no idea what Rodgers salary is. My guess as to the top 5 paid QB's are the Mannings, Brady, Brees, and could be any one of Ben, Rodgers, Rivers, Romo, Cutler(doubtful), or Vick.
 

SuperSpck

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Posts
7,977
Reaction score
15
Location
Iowa
Finley could cost around 5.5 million while Flynn would cost over 10 million. Also, why would a team pay two firsts to match, when they could let the Packers just eat +10 million? Flynn has potential, and teams will be willing to gamble on it, but not at those dollars and the loss of a high pick. Unlike the Eagles last year, the Packers have very little leverage in this.

Because QBs are valued.
Letting the Packers, a team who always manage the cap well, eat $10M doesn't hurt them. They're not the Skins or the Raiders when it comes to spending.

If Finley's got a brain he'll want to give the hometown discount and if not, the Pack has proved they can live without him. May as well try to get something for a QB and risk letting Finley walk.
 

wilycoyote24

All Star
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Posts
707
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin
I think people on this board caring about this is like how to a starving person a rat may look appetizing.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Because QBs are valued.
Letting the Packers, a team who always manage the cap well, eat $10M doesn't hurt them. They're not the Skins or the Raiders when it comes to spending.

If Finley's got a brain he'll want to give the hometown discount and if not, the Pack has proved they can live without him. May as well try to get something for a QB and risk letting Finley walk.

A message board myth...
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
26,733
Reaction score
35,046
Location
Colorado
Wondering if he did get tagged, would his salary be greater than Rodgers's? It would be hilarious if it was. I have no idea what Rodgers salary is. My guess as to the top 5 paid QB's are the Mannings, Brady, Brees, and could be any one of Ben, Rodgers, Rivers, Romo, Cutler(doubtful), or Vick.

Rodgers salary is very cheap. Flynn's would be significantly more.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
When a team has leverage on a player, isn't that what it's called?

It is not a myth. Many players have restructured their contracts to help the team. Others have taken less to stay at home.

It is not football but the St.Louis Cardinals have had several players take less money to play for them. That was one reason it was such a surprise to many Cardinal fans that Pujols went to LA.
 
Top