Interesting stats when Kyler runs the ball.

cardcrazy

Registered
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Posts
717
Reaction score
895
In the 12 games Murray has carried the football at least 10 times, the Cardinals sport a 10-2 record.

Widen that metric to at least five totes per game for Murray and Arizona is still over .500 at 26-20.

But 0-13-1 record when he has carried less than 5 times.
 
Last edited:

Big Deal

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Posts
1,633
Reaction score
81
I say run him or trade him…don’t try to change him.
I 100% agree with this. If the left foot versus right foot isn't going to make a vast improvement then why are the coaches preaching it? If we have a crappy oline, why aren't we calling planned rollouts where he succeeds to at least confuse the defense a little bit. I really don't like when coaches don't maximize the strengths of players, it rarely seems to work out well.
 

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
7,580
Reaction score
7,368
Location
Home of the Thunder
I say run him or trade him…don’t try to change him.

Obviously this past Sunday it was a conscious choice not to used designed runs for Murray.

He rushed six times vs. ATL, seven vs. HOU and then then only once vs. LA.

The question is why?

Like @cardcrazy pointed out, the path to winning is using K1's elite mobility. So why did we not try to do that this past Sunday?

And also if were really and currently auditioning him to be our QBOF, why not let him showcase his entire skill set?
 

reebokalone2001

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 27, 2021
Posts
1,143
Reaction score
1,357
Location
Mesa, Arizona
I 100% agree with this. If the left foot versus right foot isn't going to make a vast improvement then why are the coaches preaching it? If we have a crappy oline, why aren't we calling planned rollouts where he succeeds to at least confuse the defense a little bit. I really don't like when coaches don't maximize the strengths of players, it rarely seems to work out well.
I tend to agree with what Harry said that the coaches now are not thinking about winning at all but evaluating if Murray can play like a pocket passer by asking him to play within the structure.
 

urs

All Star
Joined
Sep 15, 2021
Posts
820
Reaction score
1,961
Location
Carefree
Last week's gameplan was extremely puzzling. I was all on board with this staff, even through all the losses, but my patience is wearing down. I'm not even expecting a lot of wins, but win the winnable games and at least have a competent plan in place. Zero designed runs other than the goal line carry is actively trying to lose IMO
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
36,994
Reaction score
26,796
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I 100% agree with this. If the left foot versus right foot isn't going to make a vast improvement then why are the coaches preaching it? If we have a crappy oline, why aren't we calling planned rollouts where he succeeds to at least confuse the defense a little bit. I really don't like when coaches don't maximize the strengths of players, it rarely seems to work out well.

Yes, there's a bizarre disconnect between how Petzing says left foot/right foot forward really doesn't matter much and also left foot forward is the best and most important thing. Is this offense so fragile that you have to remake the mechanics of every veteran quarterback to function?

OTOH, I'm fine not running a bunch of QB rollouts and bootlegs when winning games isn't a priority. The more important thing is encouraging Kyler to make rhythm passes and letting him study the results on-film. At this point, there's no other time to do this than in games.

I think they're trying to take away a few of Kyler's easy buttons to encourage progress over the next year.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,600
Reaction score
61,335
Yes, there's a bizarre disconnect between how Petzing says left foot/right foot forward really doesn't matter much and also left foot forward is the best and most important thing. Is this offense so fragile that you have to remake the mechanics of every veteran quarterback to function?

OTOH, I'm fine not running a bunch of QB rollouts and bootlegs when winning games isn't a priority. The more important thing is encouraging Kyler to make rhythm passes and letting him study the results on-film. At this point, there's no other time to do this than in games.

I think they're trying to take away a few of Kyler's easy buttons to encourage progress over the next year.
I also think they’re limiting his exposure to big hits running around, just in case there’s a world where he can be traded in the off-season. He goes down with another injury and this team is even more behind the 8 ball than they already are.
 

Ronin

…..
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
133,870
Reaction score
53,549
Location
Las Cruces, New Mexico
I also think they’re limiting his exposure to big hits running around, just in case there’s a world where he can be traded in the off-season. He goes down with another injury and this team is even more behind the 8 ball than they already are.
100%
I was just going to say the team is exposing Kyler to a big hit or injury.

Heck he got injured on a non contact play.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
38,236
Reaction score
21,055
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
In the 12 games Murray has carried the football at least 10 times, the Cardinals sport a 10-2 record.

Widen that metric to at least five totes per game for Murray and Arizona is still over .500 at 26-20.

But 0-13-1 record when he has carried less than 5 times.
That bodes very poorly for his career. If you have to rely on running or be erased as a QB, you are not legit.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
25,747
Reaction score
32,468
Location
BirdGangThing
Obviously this past Sunday it was a conscious choice not to used designed runs for Murray.

He rushed six times vs. ATL, seven vs. HOU and then then only once vs. LA.

The question is why?
I think they want to make sure he can play within the offense, first and foremost, and not just run at the 1st sight of a defender in his face. Sean Peyton talked about similar regarding Murray last season...that he can't just be relied upon to be the bulk of the offense.
 

football karma

Happy in the pretense of knowledge
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
14,890
Reaction score
13,172
I also think they’re limiting his exposure to big hits running around, just in case there’s a world where he can be traded in the off-season. He goes down with another injury and this team is even more behind the 8 ball than they already are.
the thing is:

he is really good at avoiding those hits, especially when running

and the boot action stuff makes it easy to avoid a hit ---

it feels like the odds of a bad injury are higher in the pocket than out of it
 

DaHilg

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 12, 2021
Posts
1,301
Reaction score
1,810
Location
Boston
That bodes very poorly for his career. If you have to rely on running or be erased as a QB, you are not legit.
It’s not relying on running Stout… it’s making it a threat that defense has to think about. Lamar and Hurts have always been far less accurate passers than Kyler all the way back to all of college… the schemes were designed around the threat of the run to open up the receivers more in lanes of the throws that they can make… including deep throws as the defense is always leaning fwd for fear of the run.
 

football karma

Happy in the pretense of knowledge
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
14,890
Reaction score
13,172
I also think they’re limiting his exposure to big hits running around, just in case there’s a world where he can be traded in the off-season. He goes down with another injury and this team is even more behind the 8 ball than they already are.
the thing is:

he is really good at avoiding those hits, especially when running

and the boot action stuff makes it easy to avoid a hit ---

it feels like the odds of a bad injury are higher in the pocket than out of it
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
38,236
Reaction score
21,055
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
It’s not relying on running Stout… it’s making it a threat that defense has to think about. Lamar and Hurts have always been far less accurate passers than Kyler all the way back to all of college… the schemes were designed around the threat of the run to open up the receivers more in lanes of the throws that they can make… including deep throws as the defense is always leaning fwd for fear of the run.
While I agree that the threat of the run definitely helps running QBs, there has to be a limit and the QB has to have success doing so. Sure, Kyler can make some amazing splash plays, but he hasn't had any success in clutch situations in-season and in the postseason. Lamar and Hurts have more than earned the benefit of the doubt, however, with the success they've had. Kyler hasn't, so the same benefit of the doubt doesn't apply. He hasn't been good enough relying on the threat of the run--he needs to be better as a throwing QB. Should he achieve some of the success those guys have, the conversation will change.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
36,994
Reaction score
26,796
Location
Gilbert, AZ
While I agree that the threat of the run definitely helps running QBs, there has to be a limit and the QB has to have success doing so. Sure, Kyler can make some amazing splash plays, but he hasn't had any success in clutch situations in-season and in the postseason. Lamar and Hurts have more than earned the benefit of the doubt, however, with the success they've had. Kyler hasn't, so the same benefit of the doubt doesn't apply. He hasn't been good enough relying on the threat of the run--he needs to be better as a throwing QB. Should he achieve some of the success those guys have, the conversation will change.

I don't know if this is entirely fair. There are a lot of different kinds of clutch situations, and to me the Hail Murray and OT run against the Raiders count as shining examples that immediately come to mind.

You can definitely and fairly argue that he's come up short in big games, but I also think you can reasonably say that Kliff Kingsbury might've also had a lot to do with that.

The steel man argument for this travesty of a season is that Gannon and Petzing are trying to establish habits with Kyler and the rest of the team that will limit the need for heroics to big games, and make games against an Vegas team that finished the 2022 season 6-11 routine wins.
 
OP
OP
cardcrazy

cardcrazy

Registered
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Posts
717
Reaction score
895
That bodes very poorly for his career. If you have to rely on running or be erased as a QB, you are not legit.
I would say not “rely” on running but remain a pass first QB and use running as a threat to keep the defense on their heels. Have a few designed runs per game to remind them.
And… “erased as a QB”?
 

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
7,580
Reaction score
7,368
Location
Home of the Thunder
I would say not “rely” on running but remain a pass first QB and use running as a threat to keep the defense on their heels. Have a few designed runs per game to remind them.
And… “erased as a QB”?

I think the word @Stout was looking for maybe was "nullified" or something similar Cardcrazy. haha.

I agree K1's mobility is a weapon that can truly differentiate our offense's ability to move the ball vs. a conventional offense, and (and!) make us lethal in the red zone.

Murray's running is a cheat code. If we don't run him ten times a game, we're wasting his talent, and limiting our offense's potential.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
38,236
Reaction score
21,055
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
I don't know if this is entirely fair. There are a lot of different kinds of clutch situations, and to me the Hail Murray and OT run against the Raiders count as shining examples that immediately come to mind.

You can definitely and fairly argue that he's come up short in big games, but I also think you can reasonably say that Kliff Kingsbury might've also had a lot to do with that.

The steel man argument for this travesty of a season is that Gannon and Petzing are trying to establish habits with Kyler and the rest of the team that will limit the need for heroics to big games, and make games against an Vegas team that finished the 2022 season 6-11 routine wins.
Regular season games where nothing but a W is on the line, sure. We simply cannot ignore how awful he has been in playoff-clinching games and the one playoff game, though, regardless of the coaching. It's been bad, and in more than a few of those games. That is anti-clutch.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,054
Reaction score
14,532
Location
Plainfield, Il.
That bodes very poorly for his career. If you have to rely on running or be erased as a QB, you are not legit.
Again I agree. Running is fine but you have to be a Qb. If it were up to me I would be moving the pocket 75% of the time rather than straight back.

I’m not talking about a full roll out. Just a bit to the right or left. If the play called for a roll right and they had a blitz set up Kyler could audible to roll left. I also think this would prevent defenses simply setting up to contain him in the pocket like the Rams do so well.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
537,267
Posts
5,268,326
Members
6,275
Latest member
Beagleperson
Top