Free Agency 2020

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
OKC is much worse. Houston is worse. Denver is worse. GS just suffered a massive blow. The Clippers are worse.

we’re all about health. If healthy the idea that CP3 is “moderately” better than Rubio is just you wanting to bitch to bitch. You know CP3 is a massive upgrade over Rubio if healthy.

New Orleans is better. Minnesota is better. Portland is better. Dallas is better. Houston is actually about the same, only with better size. And while suffering setbacks, the Clippers, Denver and Golden State still have better overall rosters than the Suns, as do the Jazz and of course the Lakers.

Meanwhile, look at Paul and Rubio's respective numbers from last year. Yes, Paul is theoretically an upgrade, but not as significant of one as you might imagine.

At this point, the only teams in the West I am confident will finish worse than the Suns this season are the Kings, the Thunder and the Spurs.
 
Last edited:

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
88,600
Reaction score
61,342
Look at their respective numbers from last year. Yes, Paul is theoretically an upgrade, but not as significant of one as you might imagine.

numbers don’t tell the whole story and you know it. Numbers don’t show how much of a liability Rubio was on D and that teams could sag all the way off clogging up the lane for Ayton.

Chris Paul was 2nd team all-nba. Rubio was a mediocre PG like he’s been his entire career.

this argument is idiotic.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
9,926
Reaction score
6,166
Look at their respective numbers from last year. Yes, Paul is theoretically an upgrade, but not as significant of one as you might imagine.
He is a significant upgrade. He commands a ton more respect from defenders than Rubio does.

This is just another case of you basing everything off of stats, but the stats don't indicate how much more the other players will be freed up with Paul on the court instead of Rubio.
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
He is a significant upgrade. He commands a ton more respect from defenders than Rubio does.

This is just another case of you basing everything off of stats, but the stats don't indicate how much more the other players will be freed up with Paul on the court instead of Rubio.

Freed up to do what? Bridges and Crowder are offensive liabilities no matter who the point guard is.
 

WhyAlwaysMe

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Posts
3,037
Reaction score
1,306
Location
Earth
New Orleans is better. Minnesota is better. Portland is better. Dallas is better. Houston is actually about the same, only with better size. And while suffering setbacks, the Clippers, Denver and Golden State still have better overall rosters than the Suns, as do the Jazz and of course the Lakers.

Meanwhile, look at Paul and Rubio's respective numbers from last year. Yes, Paul is theoretically an upgrade, but not as significant of one as you might imagine.

At this point, the only teams in the West I am confident will finish worse than the Suns this season are the Kings, the Thunder and the Spurs.

Suns’ win total vs Minnesota.

I’ll take Suns at evens.
 

WhyAlwaysMe

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Posts
3,037
Reaction score
1,306
Location
Earth
Ok, but highly efficient low volume guys are liabilities how? Especially when the Suns have three high volume bucket guys on the team?
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
9,926
Reaction score
6,166
Freed up to do what? Bridges and Crowder are offensive liabilities no matter who the point guard is.
Seriously? Everyone on the team will be freed up. Booker and Ayton also fall into that category. Booker will see a lot more clean looks at 3s and Ayton will see far more easy baskets at the rim. The offense will flow much better with Paul instead of Rubio.

Whenever teams realized that Rubio wasn't going to beat them with his own shot/scoring they would simply sag off him and make him either shoot or pass to a teammate that wasn't open.

It would only come back to bite the opposing team like once every 4-5 games where Rubio would actually be willing to take a lot of shots and maybe make a good percentage of them.

With Paul however teams will have to consider him a threat to score every time he has the ball and that means guys can't cheat off of him to help elsewhere. Off ball defenders will also have to keep an eye on him in case he beats his man and they have to rotate over to try and stop him from getting a layup.
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
Millsap just re-signed with Denver for 1 year, $10 million. He would have been a MUCH better acquisition for us than Crowder. (So would have Portis, Taj Gibson and Chris Boucher.)
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
Seriously? Everyone on the team will be freed up. Booker and Ayton also fall into that category. Booker will see a lot more clean looks at 3s and Ayton will see far more easy baskets at the rim. The offense will flow much better with Paul instead of Rubio.

Whenever teams realized that Rubio wasn't going to beat them with his own shot/scoring they would simply sag off him and make him either shoot or pass to a teammate that wasn't open.

It would only come back to bite the opposing team like once every 4-5 games where Rubio would actually be willing to take a lot of shots and maybe make a good percentage of them.

With Paul however teams will have to consider him a threat to score every time he has the ball and that means guys can't cheat off of him to help elsewhere. Off ball defenders will also have to keep an eye on him in case he beats his man and they have to rotate over to try and stop him from getting a layup.

So instead of sagging off of Rubio and Bridges, opponents are going to say off of Crowder and Bridges. We're playing 3 on 5 offensively and 4 on 5 defensively.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
9,926
Reaction score
6,166
Millsap just re-signed with Denver for 1 year, $10 million. He would have been a MUCH better acquisition for us than Crowder. (So would have Portis, Taj Gibson and Chris Boucher.)
Considering how much you want to harp on 3 point shooting numbers why would you want Taj Gibson? Dude does nothing from behind the arc.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
9,926
Reaction score
6,166
So instead of sagging off of Rubio and Bridges, opponents are going to say off of Crowder and Bridges. We're playing 3 on 5 offensively and 4 on 5 defensively.
No one is sagging off Crowder or Bridges. They both shoot north of 34% (Bridges 36%) and are willing to pull the trigger when they have the opening. Rubio wouldn't typically pull the trigger on a 3 unless he was wide open.
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
Considering how much you want to harp on 3 point shooting numbers why would you want Taj Gibson? Dude does nothing from behind the arc.

Gibson is a better defender and much better shooter from inside the arc, plus his PER is 4 points higher.
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
No one is sagging off Crowder or Bridges. They both shoot north of 34% (Bridges 36%) and are willing to pull the trigger when they have the opening. Rubio wouldn't typically pull the trigger on a 3 unless he was wide open.

Take away the bubble anomaly, and Crowder was at 29%.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
9,926
Reaction score
6,166
Gibson is a better defender and much better shooter from inside the arc, plus his PER is 4 points higher.
His inside the arc shooting provides even less space that you are complaining about Crowder producing...
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
His inside the arc shooting provides even less space that you are complaining about Crowder producing...

It's better than no shooting. And again, Gibson would have brought better size, better defense and better rim protection.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
9,926
Reaction score
6,166
Take away the bubble anomaly, and Crowder was at 29%.
Take away the bubble and Crowder was still shooting 39% with Miami. Seems to suggest it maybe wasn't such a fluke and maybe had something to do with the looks they were getting him.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
9,926
Reaction score
6,166
It's better than no shooting. And again, Gibson would have brought better size, better defense and better rim protection.
Except Crowder doesn't provide no shooting. He provides about 34% from 3 on 5+ attempts per game. That's 5 more attempts than Gibson would every give you.

The only player that provides none of something is Gibson and shooting 3s. Which is a must for a PF playing big minutes nowadays.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
113,035
Reaction score
52,493
Strange that Nuggets pulled QO for Craig.

Craig played quite a bit for Denver last season. I remember because I didn't recognize the name. He is worth a look by a team. Could even play some power forward.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
537,304
Posts
5,268,810
Members
6,275
Latest member
Beagleperson
Top