Clayton - 75% Detroit will trade #2 pick.

[JeffGollin]

According to John Clayton at 10am EST, the Patsies are offering both #1's and their new #2 (from trade with Miami) to Detroit.

They'd presumably screw the Jets and take Robertson.

This means Rogers would drop to #4 or lower. Jets could take Rogers (they need receiving help) or Newman or Kennedy or Suggs.

If the Jets draft Newman, what does Team Felon do? Do they go Suggs? Kennedy? Or Rogers?

Cards could wind up having to choose between Suggs and Rogers. (Only stickey wicket would be Rogers' agents, the Postons who have a reputation for being holdout happy). If he drops to us, I predict we take Rogers over Suggs (This may be why we delayed doing the deal with Robertson).

 

[Shane]

Originally posted by JeffGollin
According to John Clayton at 10am EST, the Patsies are offering both #1's and their new #2 (from trade with Miami) to Detroit.

They'd presumably screw the Jets and take Robertson.

This means Rogers would drop to #4 or lower. Jets could take Rogers (they need receiving help) or Newman or Kennedy or Suggs.

If the Jets draft Newman, what does Team Felon do? Do they go Suggs? Kennedy? Or Rogers?

Cards could wind up having to choose between Suggs and Rogers. (Only stickey wicket would be Rogers' agents, the Postons who have a reputation for being holdout happy). If he drops to us, I predict we take Rogers over Suggs (This may be why we delayed doing the deal with Robertson).

You know thatw ould piss off the J_E_T_S

 

[BuckeyeCardinal]

But

The head coach wants Rogers and the fans want Rogers.

 

[arthurracoon]

Wouldn't Houston take Rodgers at #3

 

[Red Air Force]

Originally posted by arthurracoon
Wouldn't Houston take Rodgers at #3

Yes

and the Jets wouls take Johnson, and the girls would still take Newman