Chiefs/Cardinals trade leverage....

Alphaman

Rookie
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Posts
69
Reaction score
0
for Jones just shifted a bit towards the Cardinals. One of my main points has been that the Chiefs had other options. It appears that Olandis Gary has signed with the Bills. This gives the Cardinals a little more leverage in the negotiations.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
37,481
Reaction score
36,973
Location
Charlotte, NC
Originally posted by Alphaman
for Jones just shifted a bit towards the Cardinals. One of my main points has been that the Chiefs had other options. It appears that Olandis Gary has signed with the Bills. This gives the Cardinals a little more leverage in the negotiations.

I think we always had the leverage to be honest. Jones, even though he hasn't always shown it, would be a much better back for the Chiefs than Gary. Gary is done, as far as being a good player with the injuries he has had.

Heck I don't even understand why the Bills signed him. Sammy Morris is a pretty good player, and better than Gary imo.

I still think that the Cards should shoot for a 5th-6th, and not take a 7th. You watch, if the Chiefs pick up Jones that might look like a steal. Jones is pretty quick, decently strong, and has pretty good (not great) hands. He also is very good at picking up the blitz.
 

az643dp

"The Tugboat"
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
839
Reaction score
0
Location
Chandler, AZ
Re: Re: Chiefs/Cardinals trade leverage....

Originally posted by Krangthebrain
Jones is pretty quick, decently strong, and has pretty good (not great) hands. He also is very good at picking up the blitz.

The problem is that Jones has no balance and no vision. If someone sneezes, he falls to the turf. I sometimes wondered if somebody tied his shoelaces together.

The Seattle game was a fluke. The fact that he lost his starting job three times in his young career is no fluke.
 

Shane

This is my year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
75,858
Reaction score
54,632
Location
Las Vegas
Re: Re: Re: Chiefs/Cardinals trade leverage....

Originally posted by az643dp
The problem is that Jones has no balance and no vision. If someone sneezes, he falls to the turf. I sometimes wondered if somebody tied his shoelaces together.

The Seattle game was a fluke. The fact that he lost his starting job three times in his young career is no fluke.

Sorry az643dp but you are exagerating just a tad bit!

Jones was actually having the makings of a solid season until his severe ankle injury which he even played through for most of the San Diego game. The guy showed some true heart and gutted out a very good but tough game!

He was not being knocked down either he was actually getting some YAC.

I agree it was only a very short period of time but he definately showed some promise and I personally think will still be a very goo RB in the NFL. Albeit with another team!
 

RedStorm

Next NY Gov
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,618
Reaction score
2
Location
Gilbert
Re: Re: Re: Chiefs/Cardinals trade leverage....

Originally posted by az643dp
The problem is that Jones has no balance and no vision. If someone sneezes, he falls to the turf. I sometimes wondered if somebody tied his shoelaces together.

The Seattle game was a fluke. The fact that he lost his starting job three times in his young career is no fluke.

I am in the "Trade Jones or sit him the entire year" camp. But, I must think that part of Jone's problem was the fact that, and I will keep him anonyomous for fear his followers will rise up, a certain QB would make bone head plays and put us behind. A RB needs reps and lots of them. So, I think most of our skilled players on O was at somewhat of a disadvantage.

However, I do think Jones needs to be traded due to his attitude and feelings towards the team. But not because he has little or no talent.

Sounds like we do have a shot at trading him. I hope it is to a team in the AFC.
 

EndZone

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
2,369
Reaction score
38
Location
New York
Re: Re: Re: Chiefs/Cardinals trade leverage....

Originally posted by az643dp
The problem is that Jones has no balance and no vision. If someone sneezes, he falls to the turf. I sometimes wondered if somebody tied his shoelaces together.

The Seattle game was a fluke. The fact that he lost his starting job three times in his young career is no fluke.

That is really a ridiculous post. I can understand not liking a guy but take the blinders off dude. I mean I want him to be traded as much as the next guy but I am not going to sit here and claim the guy is terrible.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
19
Location
The Aventine
Re: Re: Re: Re: Chiefs/Cardinals trade leverage....

Originally posted by EndZone
I am not going to sit here and claim the guy is terrible.

Why not? What has he done to prove he's any good? Don't give me the "he was a top-5 pick" baloney, either. Plenty of top-5 picks have busted.
 

blindseyed

I'm saying you ARE stuck in Wichita
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Posts
8,181
Reaction score
6,040
Location
Verrado
What?

Pariah
I agree there's no consistent stats that say otherwise. No production except for here and there. In the NFL you have to look at a RB that can produce more than a few games a year and Jones hasn't done that. He's just not a good back at this point. If his stats are terrible then he's a terrible back right now.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
In case any KC fans or members of the Chiefs' staff are cruising this board -

Thomas Jones was picked high because of his football skills - he has great straight ahead speed, home run ability and can run low through the hole.

He was sidetracked due to injuries and a traffic jam in front of him in Pittman and Shipp. He's a gamer who comes to play.

And lets not forget "quick twitch" while we're at it.

We're very depressed that we may have to lose a player with so much talent and potential.

(heh heh)
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
37,481
Reaction score
36,973
Location
Charlotte, NC
Originally posted by JeffGollin
In case any KC fans or members of the Chiefs' staff are cruising this board -

Thomas Jones was picked high because of his football skills - he has great straight ahead speed, home run ability and can run low through the hole.

He was sidetracked due to injuries and a traffic jam in front of him in Pittman and Shipp. He's a gamer who comes to play.

And lets not forget "quick twitch" while we're at it.

We're very depressed that we may have to lose a player with so much talent and potential.

(heh heh)

Exactly Jeff! Thomas Jones has excellent run vision, and he never gets tackled for a loss :)rolleyes: ).
He also is powerful to hole and never goes down easily, always getting extra yardage :)rolleyes: ).
He is a great character guy, who is a vocal leader and he unites the team, and he would never lie :)rolleyes: ).
 

EndZone

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
2,369
Reaction score
38
Location
New York
Re: What?

Originally posted by blindseyed
Pariah
I agree there's no consistent stats that say otherwise. No production except for here and there. In the NFL you have to look at a RB that can produce more than a few games a year and Jones hasn't done that. He's just not a good back at this point. If his stats are terrible then he's a terrible back right now.

Lets see 3.7 ypc and 5.7 ypr. Yes those are TERRIBLE stats so he must be a terrible back! Oh hold on lets see what other backs were around 3.7 last year....hmmm. Stephen Davis, Jerome Bettis, TJ Duckett, Duce Staley....yes he must suck! Only thing is they had 200 300+ carries and he had 138.

Jones was in the to 10 in the league before he got hurt...oh yes but he sucks, Jones out-perfomed Pittman the year before Pittman was the starting tailback for the Superbowl champions...oh yes but Jones sucks.

There you go he sucks.
 
OP
OP
A

Alphaman

Rookie
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Posts
69
Reaction score
0
Originally posted by JeffGollin
In case any KC fans or members of the Chiefs' staff are cruising this board -

Thomas Jones was picked high because of his football skills - he has great straight ahead speed, home run ability and can run low through the hole.

He was sidetracked due to injuries and a traffic jam in front of him in Pittman and Shipp. He's a gamer who comes to play.

And lets not forget "quick twitch" while we're at it.

We're very depressed that we may have to lose a player with so much talent and potential.

(heh heh)

Resident Chiefs fan here. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I think I'm interested now....:wave:

Seriously, I hope a deal can be struck between the Chiefs and the Cardinals. It seems clear he needs to be out AZ (for himself and the team) and we need a backup RB. Seems like the right partners.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
37,481
Reaction score
36,973
Location
Charlotte, NC
Re: Re: What?

Originally posted by EndZone
Lets see 3.7 ypc and 5.7 ypr. Yes those are TERRIBLE stats so he must be a terrible back! Oh hold on lets see what other backs were around 3.7 last year....hmmm. Stephen Davis, Jerome Bettis, TJ Duckett, Duce Staley....yes he must suck! Only thing is they had 200 300+ carries and he had 138.

Jones was in the to 10 in the league before he got hurt...oh yes but he sucks, Jones out-perfomed Pittman the year before Pittman was the starting tailback for the Superbowl champions...oh yes but Jones sucks.

There you go he sucks.

But the one thing is: the more he played, the more his average dropped. That one game (Seattle) inflated his average for the entire season (and by the way 5.7 per reception does suck).

Jones is a huge flop, and imo doesn't have what it takes to be a good NFL back. He lacks run vision and natural instincts, which are crucial to being a great NFL back.
 

EndZone

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
2,369
Reaction score
38
Location
New York
Re: Re: Re: What?

Originally posted by Krangthebrain
But the one thing is: the more he played, the more his average dropped. That one game (Seattle) inflated his average for the entire season (and by the way 5.7 per reception does suck).

Jones is a huge flop, and imo doesn't have what it takes to be a good NFL back. He lacks run vision and natural instincts, which are crucial to being a great NFL back.

Yes and he got hurt in the 2nd game so the fact that he played 7 more injured and still has a 3.7 ypc.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
37,481
Reaction score
36,973
Location
Charlotte, NC
Re: Re: Re: Re: What?

Originally posted by EndZone
Yes and he got hurt in the 2nd game so the fact that he played 7 more injured and still has a 3.7 ypc.

But injuries always are a part of the equation.

Receiving
Date Opp Att Yds Avg TD Rec Yds Avg TD
9/8 @ Washington 17 54 54 0 3 7 7 0
9/15 @ Seattle 24 173 173 1 2 18 18 0
9/22 San Diego 17 73 73 0 1 6 6 0
9/29 NY Giants 11 10 10 0 0 0 0 0
10/20 Dallas 22 68 68 0 3 17 17 0
10/27 @ San Francisco 15 54 54 1 2 24 24 0
11/3 St. Louis 12 25 25 0 4 31 31 0
11/10 Seattle 11 24 24 0 3 8 8 0
11/17 @ Philadelphia 9 30 30 0 2 2 2 0

Other than that one game where he averaged 7.2 yards per carry, he basically average 3 yards per carry behind an offensive line that I think is pretty good. Shipp average over a yard and a half more.
 

Jim O

Registered User
Joined
Sep 4, 2002
Posts
5,838
Reaction score
10
Location
Tempe, AZ
Re: Re: Re: Chiefs/Cardinals trade leverage....

Originally posted by az643dp
The fact that he lost his starting job three times in his young career is no fluke.

Good point!
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Chiefs/Cardinals trade leverage....

Originally posted by Pariah
Why not? What has he done to prove he's any good? Don't give me the "he was a top-5 pick" baloney, either. Plenty of top-5 picks have busted.

Yes Jones could be a bust just like Garrison Hearst. If we eliminate every guy who plays or has played for Airizona and does not like all the losing we could not put a team on the field. Let us face the fact that we have been one of the armpits of the NFL so if a guy does like it here he is suspect. It is going to take some years to change this image.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
37,481
Reaction score
36,973
Location
Charlotte, NC
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Chiefs/Cardinals trade leverage....

Originally posted by john h
Yes Jones could be a bust just like Garrison Hearst. If we eliminate every guy who plays or has played for Airizona and does not like all the losing we could not put a team on the field. Let us face the fact that we have been one of the armpits of the NFL so if a guy does like it here he is suspect. It is going to take some years to change this image.

You keep comparing Jones with Hearst and that is just a very bad comparison. Hearst gained over 1,000 yards behind probably the most pitiful offensive line the Cards have had in 20 years.

Hearst was blossoming into a pretty good runner when we erroneously cut him for Leeland McElroy.
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,503
Reaction score
967
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Thomas Jones has amazing ability to break tackles... just like Adrian Murrell did. :)

Jones could not stay on his feet. If a defender touched him he would start falling down. He had a fantastic game against a pitiful run defense in Seattle, but otherwise it was another forgettable season.

Joe
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
15,566
Reaction score
8,062
Location
Mesa, AZ
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Chiefs/Cardinals trade leverage....

Originally posted by john h
Airizona


I know this is likely a typo but a cool spelling of the state name if the Cards actually do open up the offense.

Instead of West Coast Offense, a new term could be coined.

The Airizona Offense

Better trademark it or copyright it or whatever so it is your property. :thumbup:
 

fan4life

Newbie
Joined
Dec 16, 2002
Posts
1
Reaction score
0
This is my first time posting on a board, but here goes my take on TJ. After the first two weeks of the season everyone who posted on this board were tickled pink over TJ's production but what everyone seems to forget is that he suffered a high ankle sprain at the end of that game and he was never the same after that. I blame that on the coaching staff for not having him sit out until he was somewhat recovered. He was never able to practice but they expected him to be able to perform on sunday's. Unlike the Rams who when Marshall Faulk suffered the same injury gave him time to heal by sitting him out several games. So i guess what I'm saying is that I'm convinced that TJ, if he remains healthy, is a very good RB and is better than anyone currently on the roster, including Shipp.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
37,481
Reaction score
36,973
Location
Charlotte, NC
Originally posted by fan4life
This is my first time posting on a board, but here goes my take on TJ. After the first two weeks of the season everyone who posted on this board were tickled pink over TJ's production but what everyone seems to forget is that he suffered a high ankle sprain at the end of that game and he was never the same after that. I blame that on the coaching staff for not having him sit out until he was somewhat recovered. He was never able to practice but they expected him to be able to perform on sunday's. Unlike the Rams who when Marshall Faulk suffered the same injury gave him time to heal by sitting him out several games. So i guess what I'm saying is that I'm convinced that TJ, if he remains healthy, is a very good RB and is better than anyone currently on the roster, including Shipp.

It's nice that you are convinced, but I would say 99% of everyone else isn't.

Jones, over a three year span, proved to be mediocre to below average, save one game.
 

buff17

Rookie
Joined
Apr 5, 2003
Posts
70
Reaction score
0
Yeah and just think.... hes 24 years old. He's done, its over. He might as well hang it up.

I hope he is working his butt off this offseason. I hope he is traded to KC. He starts the season as the backup, Holmes gets hurt again. What do they do, give the ball to Jones? He has a bad game. Now they give the ball to Jones? He has a couple of average games. They give the ball to Jones, he has a couple of good games. They give the ball to Jones, he has some great games.

They give the ball to Jones.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,403,462
Posts
6,632,787
Members
6,435
Latest member
taylor_fancav
Top