I still stand by my comment that he is an overpaid glorified role player
Thats not saying much. He is not a max player and therefore a cancer to the team from a salary standpoint. Hopefully went dont get bent over on his departure. Who am I kidding.. we wont be able to walk for a week Kobe style
Yes he is the best player on our terrible team. Of course teams are going to focus on a teams best player. Being the cream of the crap does not make him a star though. Oh geez the whole “scored 70” defense. Yes he did once on one of our worst teams that fed him the ball the whole game and we still lost by 10. Anyone can get hot and put up that many points in that situation. He is not a leader. He is not a winner. He doesnt play defense. We are much better off without him.Cant think of too many "role Players" that are double and triple teamed for 35 min a game (because the ownership is too incompetent to find help for him) and average over 25 pts. Or score 70 points or would put up with the crap Booker has for 5 years. I hope he does go to the Wolves. Im a true blue Suns fan but we are the @sscrack of the NBA under current ownership.
Amazing that posts like this still exist. It's like you're "watching" games with your eyes closed.Yes he is the best player on our terrible team. Of course teams are going to focus on a teams best player. Being the cream of the crap does not make him a star though. Oh geez the whole “scored 70” defense. Yes he did once on one of our worst teams that fed him the ball the whole game and we still lost by 10. Anyone can get hot and put up that many points in that situation. He is not a leader. He is not a winner. He doesnt play defense. We are much better off without him.
Im pretty sure her puckering string has healed by now and she received a nice settlement.. its fine to make the jokes nowToo soon man.
Only Suns fans think Booker is an all-star caliber player. But he did score 70 onceAmazing that posts like this still exist. It's like you're "watching" games with your eyes closed.
He absolutely is an all-star caliber player.Only Suns fans think Booker is an all-star caliber player. But he did score 70 once
I "liked" your post.He absolutely is an all-star caliber player.
Lol.. who should he have gotten the nod over.He absolutely is an all-star caliber player.
Russell Westbrook and Donovan Mitchell.Lol.. who should he have gotten the nod over.
Lol.. who should he have gotten the nod over.
Russell WestbrookLol.. who should he have gotten the nod over.
Westbrook, Mitchell, Paul, Ingram, Gobert.
that was easy
Time will tell. I hope you're right. But i doubt it. Come back when hes starting his first allstar game in a Wolves jersey then talk about what/whos "special" round here.I’m pretty down on the franchise right now, but this thread, especially the OP, is a special kind of dissociation from reality.
Definitely over Mitchell? Dude is averaging 25/4/4 and his team is 10+ games better than the suns. Next.Gobert and Paul are much more impactful. Ingram made it on the positional stipulation. Westbrook was questionable. Definitely over Mitchell though...
Definitely over Mitchell? Dude is averaging 25/4/4 and his team is 10+ games better than the suns. Next.
I thought the same thing. But when i you look at each of them it’s difficult to argument book over any of them given their numbers and records. Even Ingram at 25/7/4 with 1 block and 1 steal per game and shooting 40% on threes with volume and pels the same or slightly better record wise.
and as much as Westbrook isn’t the machine he was, he’s 26/8/7 on a team that’s also 10+ games up in the suns.
Is Book responsible for the fact that the Jazz are 10 games better? Who is the better player? I thought that was what the all-star game is about? Book’s comment is dead on. It is no longer about the best players.Definitely over Mitchell? Dude is averaging 25/4/4 and his team is 10+ games better than the suns. Next.
I thought the same thing. But when i you look at each of them it’s difficult to argument book over any of them given their numbers and records. Even Ingram at 25/7/4 with 1 block and 1 steal per game and shooting 40% on threes with volume and pels the same or slightly better record wise.
and as much as Westbrook isn’t the machine he was, he’s 26/8/7 on a team that’s also 10+ games up in the suns.
Westbrook has a great January but Booker has had a better SEASON. Why is that so hard to understand??Definitely over Mitchell? Dude is averaging 25/4/4 and his team is 10+ games better than the suns. Next.
I thought the same thing. But when i you look at each of them it’s difficult to argument book over any of them given their numbers and records. Even Ingram at 25/7/4 with 1 block and 1 steal per game and shooting 40% on threes with volume and pels the same or slightly better record wise.
and as much as Westbrook isn’t the machine he was, he’s 26/8/7 on a team that’s also 10+ games up in the suns.
Sorry don’t buy that.Yeah there’s a lot of teams 10+ wins better than the Suns. We’re talking about individual players.
Mitchell has a defensive juggernaut defending the paint and he’s surrounded by elite shooters. Replace him with Book and that team is a title contender while the Suns with Mitchell are even more trash than we are now.
The numbers I pointed out aren’t January. That’s Westbrook’s season. Why is that hard to understand?Westbrook has a great January but Booker has had a better SEASON. Why is that so hard to understand??