A reality check, well maybe

Which group would you rather have

  • Plummer, Boston,Sanders,Jenkins, TJ, Makovica, Fredrickson, Lassiter,Burke,Rutledge, Grutt.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Blake,Johnson,Boldin,Smith, Hodgins,Darling,Jackson,Pace,Hayes,Garcia,Spikes

    Votes: 19 100.0%

  • Total voters
    19

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,666
Reaction score
17,132
Location
San Antonio, Texas
With what group would you rather have. I know it isn't realistic considering I'm not including the rest of the squad but what do you think?
 

ActingWild

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Posts
1,477
Reaction score
74
Neither, I think I would have gone with the group most easily had and by far better....

Blake, Boston, McAddley, Johnson, Shipp, Smith and SUGGS
 
OP
OP
Jetstream Green

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,666
Reaction score
17,132
Location
San Antonio, Texas
For better or worse

It would have been nice to keep Boston and draft Suggs, but if you look at the two groups you would have to say we are already improved over last year. There is no way Bryant won't be a better player next year and that goes along with McAddley and Johnson. I know, saying were better doesn't mean where playoff bound... but who knows in this NFL.
 
OP
OP
Jetstream Green

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,666
Reaction score
17,132
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Sorry

I meant better thisseason, I'm distracted by the next potential selections, oh, yeah we even have more money in cap space compared to the other group.
 
Top