Bridges is more efficient but Kelly can do more without being spoon fed. Kelly's stats last year were bad and he started the year historically awful from the field, shooting something like 10% from 3 through his first 10 games and his overall FG% was below 30% as well. So its hard to compare the 2 effectively by looking at last years stats alone. Comparing Kelly's previous year as a starter here vs Mikal last season is more what I believe the Hornets are hoping for.
Although it's not quite as extreme, Mikal still holds a dramatic edge in efficiency using Oubre's previous season or any season. Mikal this year had a TS of .667. Oubre's best season or partial season best was in Phoenix last year with a .560. Mikal is simply a better basketball player on both ends of the court.
Sure, Oubre can do things Mikal can't but his failures count too. And his inability to discern when to pass and when to shoot make him a lousy teammate in many ways in addition to being less efficient on offense and far less effective on defense.
You're usually so quick to rely on stats, I'm not sure why you're hanging on to this idea that Oubre is better than Mikal on offense. Can be better, yes, but the numbers are clear, he has not been Mikal's equal on offense.
