- Teams’ actual pick positions in 2031 will depend on their 2029–30 record, as the lottery system is in place for 2027–2029 drafts NBA.
That doesn't make any sense. I don't think AI quite has a handle on this yet.
- Teams’ actual pick positions in 2031 will depend on their 2029–30 record, as the lottery system is in place for 2027–2029 drafts NBA.
I'm not 100% here because they're still trading away future lottery balls for players that are underwhelming (when it comes to wins). Seems like more of the same. But the drafting seems better. And as mentioned, they addressed an obvious weakness. I'm optimistic. Life is too short.It's easy to second guess the trade, but we absolutely needed a starting PF. Maybe there were better options and maybe there weren't. Had we gone into this season without a starting PF we'd be ripping the team for doing nothing.
I for one like the aggressiveness of management to take risks, and they've shown the ability to correct mistakes, see Durant.
Much of the value of that trade came from cleaning up our cap situation. I don't know if it was a fair trade or not but, if not, I don't think it was off by much considering we picked up a first and a second in the deal.I'm not 100% here because they're still trading away future lottery balls for players that are underwhelming (when it comes to wins). Seems like more of the same. But the drafting seems better. And as mentioned, they addressed an obvious weakness. I'm optimistic. Life is too short.
Yeah, a worse first rounder, but still it’s a first round pick. And we have been making pretty good use of those so farMuch of the value of that trade came from cleaning up our cap situation. I don't know if it was a fair trade or not but, if not, I don't think it was off by much considering we picked up a first and a second in the deal.
Yeah it's about as low valued as a first can be but it is a first and we regain some flexibility too.Yeah, a worse first rounder, but still it’s a first round pick. And we have been making pretty good use of those so far
Also Bridges was a first round pick. I believe number 8.Yeah it's about as low valued as a first can be but it is a first and we regain some flexibility too.
He was 12th but he was often mentioned as a top 10 probable. Regardless, I think we got reasonable value out of the deal. I guess in some ways we probably lost the trade but all told, we cleared enough salary to bring back several players and that's a part of the equation too.Also Bridges was a first round pick. I believe number 8.
Also we got younger.He was 12th but he was often mentioned as a top 10 probable. Regardless, I think we got reasonable value out of the deal. I guess in some ways we probably lost the trade but all told, we cleared enough salary to bring back several players and that's a part of the equation too.
Listened to a podcaster, plus the sports radio on 98.7, and most of the attitude is over the pick at the end of the day. Starts off with being angry at bringing in Bridges for his off court stuff. But when people are really questioned is the pick, The anger is unprotected picks are for guys that move the needle. Big name guys. Most people don't think Bridges warrants an unprotected pick. The thought is, if we are going to give out unprotected picks, it should be for a better player.Half this boatd wanted to trade both Grayson and Royce and now that we have we lost the trade. All because of a draft pick that doesn't convey for 7 years.
Listened to a podcaster, plus the sports radio on 98.7, and most of the attitude is over the pick at the end of the day. Starts off with being angry at bringing in Bridges for his off court stuff. But when people are really questioned is the pick, The anger is unprotected picks are for guys that move the needle. Big name guys. Most people don't think Bridges warrants an unprotected pick. The thought is, if we are going to give out unprotected picks, it should be for a better player.
I haven't followed him closely but I have heard the rumblings through the years about his efficiency and high usage rate. Still, there are no perfect players and while he might not be a star, he draws defensive attention like one.Check this out:
You must be registered for see images attach
I didn't know he ranked that high in scoring and rebounding.
The Suns have never had the sense to protect any pick. All the other teams do and we NEVER have, no matter which GM or owner is involved. I am not going to get too worked up about it, but top 3 protection would have been reasonable.Listened to a podcaster, plus the sports radio on 98.7, and most of the attitude is over the pick at the end of the day. Starts off with being angry at bringing in Bridges for his off court stuff. But when people are really questioned is the pick, The anger is unprotected picks are for guys that move the needle. Big name guys. Most people don't think Bridges warrants an unprotected pick. The thought is, if we are going to give out unprotected picks, it should be for a better player.
He’s an OK player. I wonder what a player like Royce would produce given the same usage. If Miles and Kennard end up producing the same as Grayson and Royce, then we swapped first round picks for a significant cap savings. Fans don’t like it, but I get it.I haven't followed him closely but I have heard the rumblings through the years about his efficiency and high usage rate. Still, there are no perfect players and while he might not be a star, he draws defensive attention like one.
There’s only one person in this situation who beat any one up… it was Brdidges and he BEAT UP A WONAN.For big name players like Durant?
I'm so tired of the self righteous media beating this guy up, especially when they live in glass houses.
Royce was a starter. How much more usage did you want him to have? He was a 3-point chucker with a little bit of defensive unicorn mixed in. I liked him, but that's all he was and he was never going to be better than that.He’s an OK player. I wonder what a player like Royce would produce given the same usage. If Miles and Kennard end up producing the same as Grayson and Royce, then we swapped first round picks for a significant cap savings. Fans don’t like it, but I get it.
This is such a weird narrative. He's did scummy things in his past, no question there, but you are speaking in absolutes. Who is giving him a free pass?There’s only one person in this situation who beat any one up… it was Brdidges and he BEAT UP A WONAN.
Choosing to bash the media while giving a woman beater a free pass just because he now wears a jersey of a team you cheer for bewilders me to no end. If you want the player, you should be ready to also accept that his baggage is coming with him.
You missed my point completely.Royce was a starter. How much more usage did you want him to have? He was a 3-point chucker with a little bit of defensive unicorn mixed in. I liked him, but that's all he was and he was never going to be better than that.
What an odd thing to say. The statistics back up that he is a decent starting-level power forward in the league. That isn't the same for Royce. If it was a single half- or even full season of good production, I'd say sure, you probably have a point. But he's been pretty consistent in his production over the past few years. Yes, on a bad team, but we aren't exactly barn burners at this point either.You missed my point completely.
I didnt WANT Royce to have more usage, which has more to do with role on the floor than minutes. My point that even marginal players can score more and look better when they are the lead player for their team on the floor—even a player like Royce.
I am hoping that is not the case with Miles—with his usage in Charlotte. One of the worst things in the world is to get a player who thinks he is better than he is.
The famous quote from Danny Ainge after trading for Luc Longlely. “I listened to him after he got here and I thought, “oh no! We are in trouble. He thinks he is good.’”