i won't say prepare yourselves but it could happen - we've seen both sides of the ball be successful with who we have (just not at the same time) - haven't really lost anyone aside from cc
our defense is nuts - it's been stated several times by several posters - our defense declined in year #3 and that was after monti concentrated on improving it - monti added the best talents available thru free agency and the draft and that ass still somehow came out flat
make it make sense? i can't do that but we all saw what happened in real time - the influx of talent created a false trust - arizona tried to morph into philly by only sending 4 - instead of getting to the qb by any means we sat back and got carved the funk up
how in the world did rallis keep his job? i have my suspicions - namely gannon getting the blame - because i think rallis got to do as he pleased in his first season then gannon got involved - i don't know any of this - it's all speculation from a hippie on a couch
if rallis goes back to being aggressive i think we still have the guys upfront to do it - i think the season exit interviews with players may have exonerated rallis - key players like budda baker who got to personally blitz his ass off in rallis' first year
all im saying is if we get back to the schemes that were working - we have the personnel
offense is nuts too - setting nfl records while going on insane losing streaks - make that make sense? this one's easier
we ran 87 running backs due to injury - our aforementioned defense getting neutered and brissett sucking at the end of games (albeit under extreme attack)
now we have a good looking running back room - 5 guys i like - one with the possibly of being great - the play action alone is going to make brissett better - he might get 3 seconds to throw a deep ball
i can go on about mcbride and wilson and mhj but this is a cards site who's more concerned with the o-line (as am i) - i think we've improved there and they'll look better in some disguised offensive designs - teams knew what we were goung to do last year - that brings us to lafleur
lafleur gets to learn from everything petzing put on display - and there was a lot - petzing experimented his ass off with no running game and a pocket qb but never really had the time for the deep ball
lafleur and love - a hopefully(?) improved o-line and brissett in year #2 with mcbride and wilson - i keep trying to type mhj but he wasn't striking fear in anyone but himself - hoping he balls out this year but khaman
so that's it - my reasoning for why we might not be amongst the bottom - maybe around .500 but wtf knows with this club
our defense is nuts - it's been stated several times by several posters - our defense declined in year #3 and that was after monti concentrated on improving it - monti added the best talents available thru free agency and the draft and that ass still somehow came out flat
make it make sense? i can't do that but we all saw what happened in real time - the influx of talent created a false trust - arizona tried to morph into philly by only sending 4 - instead of getting to the qb by any means we sat back and got carved the funk up
how in the world did rallis keep his job? i have my suspicions - namely gannon getting the blame - because i think rallis got to do as he pleased in his first season then gannon got involved - i don't know any of this - it's all speculation from a hippie on a couch
if rallis goes back to being aggressive i think we still have the guys upfront to do it - i think the season exit interviews with players may have exonerated rallis - key players like budda baker who got to personally blitz his ass off in rallis' first year
all im saying is if we get back to the schemes that were working - we have the personnel
offense is nuts too - setting nfl records while going on insane losing streaks - make that make sense? this one's easier
we ran 87 running backs due to injury - our aforementioned defense getting neutered and brissett sucking at the end of games (albeit under extreme attack)
now we have a good looking running back room - 5 guys i like - one with the possibly of being great - the play action alone is going to make brissett better - he might get 3 seconds to throw a deep ball
i can go on about mcbride and wilson and mhj but this is a cards site who's more concerned with the o-line (as am i) - i think we've improved there and they'll look better in some disguised offensive designs - teams knew what we were goung to do last year - that brings us to lafleur
lafleur gets to learn from everything petzing put on display - and there was a lot - petzing experimented his ass off with no running game and a pocket qb but never really had the time for the deep ball
lafleur and love - a hopefully(?) improved o-line and brissett in year #2 with mcbride and wilson - i keep trying to type mhj but he wasn't striking fear in anyone but himself - hoping he balls out this year but khaman
so that's it - my reasoning for why we might not be amongst the bottom - maybe around .500 but wtf knows with this club
Last edited:
