For Those Losing Their Minds Over the Love Pick...

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
42,082
Reaction score
33,367
Who would you have drafted at #3? Trade downs weren't an option. So who would you have taken?
As I told you in the other thread Stout I didn't really like any player in the top 10 so I didn't really want anyone at #3.

But, I wouldn't have taken a RB. I truly believe he will suffer a severe injury in the next season or two and never be the same after that. So I would have taken a player with the best chance to start for a long time. It's a better use of the cap.

I don't like being that negative but I really think that is what is going to happen.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
70,645
Reaction score
69,537
Location
SoCal
As I told you in the other thread Stout I didn't really like any player in the top 10 so I didn't really want anyone at #3.

But, I wouldn't have taken a RB. I truly believe he will suffer a severe injury in the next season or two and never be the same after that. So I would have taken a player with the best chance to start for a long time. It's a better use of the cap.

I don't like being that negative but I really think that is what is going to happen.
You believe this because we are the cardinals, because of something about love, or because you believe all RBs are destined to experience that?
 
OP
OP
Stout

Stout

A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
44,415
Reaction score
33,046
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
As I told you in the other thread Stout I didn't really like any player in the top 10 so I didn't really want anyone at #3.

But, I wouldn't have taken a RB. I truly believe he will suffer a severe injury in the next season or two and never be the same after that. So I would have taken a player with the best chance to start for a long time. It's a better use of the cap.

I don't like being that negative but I really think that is what is going to happen.
Bah, that's how you end up continually sucking. It's the Levi over AD argument. Give me the Big Johns.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,608
Reaction score
38,582
Location
Orlando, FL
My point was, you can find plenty of good off ball LBs from 10-15. Historically, you don't find any of those in the top 10. Parsons would have clearly been the gigantic exception. Maybe Reese is that as well, he might be.

But if we are bucking the trend to select Reese, we can apply the same logic to Love.
On Styles had anything like Reese’s ability. He didn’t excel in performance. I don’t think you find a bunch of guys like Reese in previous years. The roles have changed too much. The lack of QBs impacted how early guys went also.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
42,082
Reaction score
33,367
You believe this because we are the cardinals, because of something about love, or because you believe all RBs are destined to experience that?
It's just what I think is going to happen. It just stats. RB has the shortest average length of career of all positions in the NFL. That is a fact.

So, it's nothing personal about Love or even the Cardinals being jinxed.

Of course I am rooting that he is going to be a true superstar. We have never really had a great RB in Arizona. If he is like Saquon Barkley then it was a great pick.
 

maroon

Newbie
Joined
Oct 20, 2025
Posts
45
Reaction score
80
Location
Missouri, USA
Those who ignore history ……….
You have a very valid point but if they run an offense that features him and use zone blocking and try and get him out in space with 7 to 8 passes a game, he's not taking the damage a ground pounding rb takes either. I would expect 20 to 22 touches a game, playing 80% of the downs, using our other backs for the heavy short yardage lifting, and he's going to be used as a hybrid I think. That injury danger exists for all elite players the NFL is nasty, but you can only do what you do.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,476
Reaction score
21,622
Location
Plainfield, Il.
We were dead in the water at running back maybe even BEFORE Connor went down. Slow, plodding and unproven.

Somebody said if we were going to draft Love why waste the money signing Allgiers. Most saw Allgiers as insurance going into a season with two backs coming off injury. If Allgiers were to go down we’d be in the same situation as last year.

Gannon wanted every drive to be a 12 play 8 minute drive, and that’s nice when you can. Nobody in last years rb room struck fear in the hearts on our opponents defense. One sack, one holding penalty and there goes your 12 play drive. Now, at least once in a while, maybe we can turn that planned 12 play drive into a 2 play drive.

Love will impact this offense more than just handing him the ball. Play action will now be a real thing. Our opponents will have that 1 second hesitation. Zones will open up a little bit more. When Love shifts into the slot imagine the nightmare that will create for defenses. He will also help the o-line. He will take pressure off our qb.

No draft selection guarantees success. Love doesn’t either. But Love is a dynamic offensive weapon that will force DC’s to plan for. Just like they plan for when facing McCaffery, Robinson, Barkley, Henry, and Gibbs. When haven’t had that since when..Ottis Anderson?

Welcome Jeremiyah.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,608
Reaction score
38,582
Location
Orlando, FL
You have a very valid point but if they run an offense that features him and use zone blocking and try and get him out in space with 7 to 8 passes a game, he's not taking the damage a ground pounding rb takes either. I would expect 20 to 22 touches a game, playing 80% of the downs, using our other backs for the heavy short yardage lifting, and he's going to be used as a hybrid I think. That injury danger exists for all elite players the NFL is nasty, but you can only do what you do.
Not much history on that system. He gets hit at the line almost every time he carries or takes a short pass. Teams will hit him hard and often. The ND film shows how often he had holes in college. He won’t see many of those in AZ. Teams will key on him, making running even tougher, but helping receivers. Hopefully Reiman will be back. Injury history much tougher on RBs.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
16,608
Reaction score
38,582
Location
Orlando, FL
We were dead in the water at running back maybe even BEFORE Connor went down. Slow, plodding and unproven.

Somebody said if we were going to draft Love why waste the money signing Allgiers. Most saw Allgiers as insurance going into a season with two backs coming off injury. If Allgiers were to go down we’d be in the same situation as last year.

Gannon wanted every drive to be a 12 play 8 minute drive, and that’s nice when you can. Nobody in last years rb room struck fear in the hearts on our opponents defense. One sack, one holding penalty and there goes your 12 play drive. Now, at least once in a while, maybe we can turn that planned 12 play drive into a 2 play drive.

Love will impact this offense more than just handing him the ball. Play action will now be a real thing. Our opponents will have that 1 second hesitation. Zones will open up a little bit more. When Love shifts into the slot imagine the nightmare that will create for defenses. He will also help the o-line. He will take pressure off our qb.

No draft selection guarantees success. Love doesn’t either. But Love is a dynamic offensive weapon that will force DC’s to plan for. Just like they plan for when facing McCaffery, Robinson, Barkley, Henry, and Gibbs. When haven’t had that since when..Ottis Anderson?

Welcome Jeremiyah.
I agree help play action and passing game in general, but not picking up rushers. He’s a weapon no doubt. We’ll have to see if he can really change the offense. I’m pessimistic.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
22,341
Reaction score
19,076
Location
Chandler, Az
This was a luxury pick. Doesn’t mean that Love isn’t a great prospect. Just feels like building the roof before the foundation is complete.

I’ll feel a lot better about this pick if the Cards can land Pregnon with their next pick. The oline prospects are getting thin fast.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
97,732
Reaction score
82,885
Having buzz does not make it a good pick. We should not be picking off of buzz. If love was in play why did we spend money on Allgeier? Someone is getting cut so is it Benson? That seems like a waste. I don’t see us keeping 4 RB on the active roster.
Benson is a waste of a roster space. So is Connor.

The supposed "depth the Cardinals had before yesterday was Allegier and two injury prone has-been and never-will-bes.

Now, does that mean I think Love was absolutely the right pick? No. In this draft I have no idea, but the Cardinals had a back-up power back on their depth chart and two massive question marks. That ain't depth.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
97,732
Reaction score
82,885
Reese.

You could have made a better argument for Love if Monti would have invested more in the oline in FA. Instead he crap the bed again.
this argument I can buy.

The even better argument I can buy is why are we looking at yet ANOTHER offseason where the front office decided we can really only try and upgrade ONE side of the ball (offense - Allgieer, the OG from Pitt, Love)... and not even go all in on that side?! I mean, they literally did NOTHING in FA on a defense that was ATROCIOUS last year.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
37,441
Reaction score
36,894
Location
Charlotte, NC
You know I was skeptical as anybody, but I have a basic philosophy with the draft that I want the Cardinals to walk away with a good player in the first round.

Is Love a good player? I think he's a fantastic player and brings a dimension to this offense that has been missing for a long time.
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
34,415
Reaction score
34,800
Location
PDX
this argument I can buy.

The even better argument I can buy is why are we looking at yet ANOTHER offseason where the front office decided we can really only try and upgrade ONE side of the ball (offense - Allgieer, the OG from Pitt, Love)... and not even go all in on that side?! I mean, they literally did NOTHING in FA on a defense that was ATROCIOUS last year.
Defense feels like more re-shuffling of chairs on the Titanic deck.

From Bilal Nichols to Ray Lopez
From Dalvin Tomlinso to Andrew Billings
From Jalen Thompson to Andrew Wingard
From Akeem Davis-Gaither to Jack Gibbens

Minus CC, the defense feels exactly the same with just a few different names. :(
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
18,476
Reaction score
21,622
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Defense feels like more re-shuffling of chairs on the Titanic deck.

From Bilal Nichols to Ray Lopez
From Dalvin Tomlinso to Andrew Billings
From Jalen Thompson to Andrew Wingard
From Akeem Davis-Gaither to Jack Gibbens

Minus CC, the defense feels exactly the same with just a few different names. :(
CC is not gone forever yet.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
97,732
Reaction score
82,885
Defense feels like more re-shuffling of chairs on the Titanic deck.

From Bilal Nichols to Ray Lopez
From Dalvin Tomlinso to Andrew Billings
From Jalen Thompson to Andrew Wingard
From Akeem Davis-Gaither to Jack Gibbens

Minus CC, the defense feels exactly the same with just a few different names. :(
it's just mind-boggling to me that this FO can seemingly only focus on really putting effort into improving ONE side of the ball per off-season, and not even going all-in there, evidenced by the gaping holes on the RT/G and... um... QB on offense... while again, sitting comfortably on 40 million in cap space... again (sitting on significant cap space).
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
44,074
Reaction score
42,394
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Defense feels like more re-shuffling of chairs on the Titanic deck.

From Bilal Nichols to Ray Lopez
From Dalvin Tomlinso to Andrew Billings
From Jalen Thompson to Andrew Wingard
From Akeem Davis-Gaither to Jack Gibbens

Minus CC, the defense feels exactly the same with just a few different names. :(
Also Jalen Thompson is gone.

Apparently we were an SMB and Starling Thomas III away from being good.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
97,732
Reaction score
82,885
Also Jalen Thompson is gone.

Apparently we were an SMB and Starling Thomas III away from being good.
it's crazy to think that as bad as last year's D was, this year's D will likely be WORSE, after three years of a "rebuild" a ton of draft capital thrown at it and still, currently sitting on a mountain of cash/cap space.
 
Top