Denny Green Fan
Registered
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Posts
- 2,471
- Reaction score
- 848
Hope it doesn’t end in divorce or child supporti woke up this morning in a world filled with love
Hope it doesn’t end in divorce or child supporti woke up this morning in a world filled with love
nah - im thinking ohioHope it doesn’t end in divorce or child support
How about a guy named Micah ParsonsNot saying Reese won't be a good player, but try to find the last few LB/EDGE drafted in the top 10 with 10 or fewer career sacks in college.
Last one I could find was Aaron Curry in '09. Before that? Maybe Keith McCants in 1990. Maybe I missed someone, and Reese clearly has massive upside, but that's pretty horrific.
Parsons was pick 12. My point was, you can find plenty of good off ball LBs from 10-15. Historically, you don't find any of those in the top 10.How about a guy named Micah Parsons
From the pre-draft information I have seen, Reese has declared himself to be an EDGE player. If a team intends to use Reese as an off-ball LB I think they will be dealing with a discontented player out of the gate. That rarely goes well for the team acquiring such a player.I’d like to know what, if any, offers they received. I would have taken Reese if there were no offers. Reese is a gamble as a pass rusher, but pretty much a sure thing as a LB.
Tip wants a word with youReese if we stayed at 3…Frances or fano if we went down to 8 or 9..way better than taking a running back at 3…thing is our first next year will be a quarterback..so once again we won’t have any blockers ….and have stud weapons everywhere….lol good times
Should have been top 10. First three picks were QBs. In this draft only 1. He was top 10 among non-QBs.Parsons was pick 12
He also had the hazing thing that teams were concerned about.Should have been top 10. First three picks were QBs. In this draft only 1. He was top 10 among non-QBs.
My point was, you can find plenty of good off ball LBs from 10-15. Historically, you don't find any of those in the top 10. Parsons would have clearly been the gigantic exception. Maybe Reese is that as well, he might be.Should have been top 10. First three picks were QBs. In this draft only 1. He was top 10 among non-QBs.
I hear you, and I would have been fine with either guy. How much less does positional value matter in this draft?Again, Love is a really nice player but positional value and scarcity matter.
Don’t think it’s an issue from what I’ve heard. He wants to be moved around. The team taking him will do that. Reese said, "I think I played both positions pretty decent. I think I know I got a lot to get better at, at edge, and I got a lot to get better at linebacker, but I'm pretty decent at both positions, I think," he offered.From the pre-draft information I have seen, Reese has declared himself to be an EDGE player. If a team intends to use Reese as an off-ball LB I think they will be dealing with a discontented player out of the gate. That rarely goes well for the team acquiring such a player.
I’m confident Fano will be a bust. No clue how his profile made him a 1st rounder, let alone a top 10 pick.Reese if we stayed at 3…Frances or fano if we went down to 8 or 9..way better than taking a running back at 3…thing is our first next year will be a quarterback..so once again we won’t have any blockers ….and have stud weapons everywhere….lol good times
From the pre-draft information I have seen, Reese has declared himself to be an EDGE player. If a team intends to use Reese as an off-ball LB I think they will be dealing with a discontented player out of the gate. That rarely goes well for the team acquiring such a player.
I just got done in a thread where @Denny Green Fan is absolutely losing his mind over it.Are people losing their minds? I see some disappointed people, but not nearly the highs and lows we've seen in the past.
No thanks on the tweener.I’d like to know what, if any, offers they received. I would have taken Reese if there were no offers. Reese is a gamble as a pass rusher, but pretty much a sure thing as a LB.
Not really. Taking an OL at #3 would have been just dumb, so his OL deficiencies don't enter into it. Yes, he should have done better on the OL in FA, though.Reese.
You could have made a better argument for Love if Monti would have invested more in the oline in FA. Instead he crap the bed again.