Stout
A handful of fairy tales from the story bag...
Who would you have drafted at #3? Trade downs weren't an option. So who would you have taken?
I’d like to know what, if any, offers they received. I would have taken Reese if there were no offers. Reese is a gamble as a pass rusher, but pretty much a sure thing as a LB.Who would you have drafted at #3? Trade downs weren't an option. So who would you have taken?
I would have preferred Reese or a trade-down. I'm not a fan of taking running backs so early. But oh well.Are people losing their minds? I see some disappointed people, but not nearly the highs and lows we've seen in the past.

Sincerely wondering, would you take an elite off-ball LB with the potential to play EDGE over many other players? Do you think Reese is that amazing of a player?I’d like to know what, if any, offers they received. I would have taken Reese if there were no offers. Reese is a gamble as a pass rusher, but pretty much a sure thing as a LB.
Cards have zero buzz, the media that spin it as a bad pick just because they didn't want Love in AZ. Bailey was the only other option @3 and he was gone. Reese will probably be exposed as a product of a stacked team @ OSU. The Cards history of drafting LB Rush Ends has been a clown show. The Cards will probably get a legit prime time game now instead of some BS Mon/Thurs night game on Prime streaming. Saying the depth @ RB is a joke, Connor is over 30 after missing 80% of last year and a career back up, and lastly a 3rd rd bust from 2 years ago....With RB being the best depth we have on the team, I would have rather had Reese in a position we lack depth.
BPA. Solid edge setter who has the athleticism to become a fine pass rusher. I don’t know if he’s amazing; he might be. I think he is a surer thing than Love when it comes to improving the team. Don’t hesitate to disagree. It’s been a long time since anyone paid for my draft expertise. I still believe you fix the defense first. Then get a QB and go from there. It’s rare to win without those 2 priorities. I understand that taking any LB this early is a gamble (so is Love for reasons I’ve posted elsewhere). If you can’t trade down, you take a risk. I wouldn’t like him but he has Browning’s quickness and far more power as a finisher. I saw how often Browning got into the pocket. Reese would have likely been an impact player on this team, especially when Nolen comes back. How often did the Cards lose lat because they couldn’t get to the QB? They say Love’s a finisher; so is Reese I think.Sincerely wondering, would you take an elite off-ball LB with the potential to play EDGE over many other players? Do you think Reese is that amazing of a player?
This is a case where I absolutely would defer to your scouting knowledge, and I have no plans to argue your stance, just interested in your take.
Not saying Reese won't be a good player, but try to find the last few LB/EDGE drafted in the top 10 with 10 or fewer career sacks in college.BPA. Solid edge setter who has the athleticism to become a fine pass rusher. I don’t know if he’s amazing; he might be. I think he is a surer thing than Love when it comes to improving the team. Don’t hesitate to disagree. It’s been a long time since anyone paid for my draft expertise. I still believe you fix the defense first. Then get a QB and go from there. It’s rare to win without those 2 priorities. I understand that taking any LB this early is a gamble (so is Love for reasons I’ve posted elsewhere). If you can’t trade down, you take a risk. I wouldn’t like him but he has Browning’s quickness and far more power as a finisher. I saw how often Browning got into the pocket. Reese would have likely been an impact player on this team, especially when Nolen comes back. How often did the Cards lose lat because they couldn’t get to the QB? They say Love’s a finisher; so is Reese I think.
Having buzz does not make it a good pick. We should not be picking off of buzz. If love was in play why did we spend money on Allgeier? Someone is getting cut so is it Benson? That seems like a waste. I don’t see us keeping 4 RB on the active roster.Cards have zero buzz, the media that spin it as a bad pick just because they didn't want Love in AZ. Bailey was the only other option @3 and he was gone. Reese will probably be exposed as a product of a stacked team @ OSU. The Cards history of drafting LB Rush Ends has been a clown show. The Cards will probably get a legit prime time game now instead of some BS Mon/Thurs night game on Prime streaming. Saying the depth @ RB is a joke, Connor is over 30 after missing 80% of last year and a career back up, and lastly a 3rd rd bust from 2 years ago....
Fair, great reply. I tend to trust my evaluations of the offensive side of the ball more than the defensive these days, but that tremendous lack of bend in the comparison of Bain vs. Reese really got me spooked about his ability to be a pass rusher. I think he'll be a very good defensive player, but as was said about the Giants' approach to Reese, I think any team was going to have to start with him off-ball and then transition him... kinda like we've done with Zaven Collins.BPA. Solid edge setter who has the athleticism to become a fine pass rusher. I don’t know if he’s amazing; he might be. I think he is a surer thing than Love when it comes to improving the team. Don’t hesitate to disagree. It’s been a long time since anyone paid for my draft expertise. I still believe you fix the defense first. Then get a QB and go from there. It’s rare to win without those 2 priorities. I understand that taking any LB this early is a gamble (so is Love for reasons I’ve posted elsewhere). If you can’t trade down, you take a risk. I wouldn’t like him but he has Browning’s quickness and far more power as a finisher. I saw how often Browning got into the pocket. Reese would have likely been an impact player on this team, especially when Nolen comes back. How often did the Cards lose lat because they couldn’t get to the QB? They say Love’s a finisher; so is Reese I think.
Well, we usually do well with hybrids. I did read that doing the same thing, over and over and expecting a different outcome is ......... .I’d like to know what, if any, offers they received. I would have taken Reese if there were no offers. Reese is a gamble as a pass rusher, but pretty much a sure thing as a LB.
lol come on now you know they would of picked love over Bailey…If Mauigoa could play LT as well as RT he should have been the pick. He can't so Love is the best day one difference maker imo. Lousy year to be drafting third overall. Couldn't get Bailey or Mendoza. Love was the right choice.
We didn't break the bank on Allgeier. It kinda sucks for him, since I think he's a pretty darn good RB (I think he's better than Conner was when we signed Conner after his stint with the Steelers), but not a game changer. If an elite tackle was available, we could have made it work.Having buzz does not make it a good pick. We should not be picking off of buzz. If love was in play why did we spend money on Allgeier? Someone is getting cut so is it Benson? That seems like a waste. I don’t see us keeping 4 RB on the active roster.
Reese if we stayed at 3…Frances or fano if we went down to 8 or 9..way better than taking a running back at 3…thing is our first next year will be a quarterback..so once again we won’t have any blockers ….and have stud weapons everywhere….lol good timesReese.