Figma

elindholm

burner account
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
29,224
Reaction score
13,333
Location
L.A. area
I had a hunch the IPO was going to go bonkers. I tried to get in on it, but set $32 as my max price, and it came in at $33. No idea whether I would have been awarded shares, or how many, but it hurts to have missed out. Very interested to see how this plays out over the next couple of months. It's been a long time since we had an IPO pop like this.
 

Devilmaycare

King of Technicalities
Administrator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Posts
10,762
Reaction score
17,894
Location
Scottsdale
I had a hunch the IPO was going to go bonkers. I tried to get in on it, but set $32 as my max price, and it came in at $33. No idea whether I would have been awarded shares, or how many, but it hurts to have missed out. Very interested to see how this plays out over the next couple of months. It's been a long time since we had an IPO pop like this.
It's a reverse Cramer effect right now. He came out with a don't buy.
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
17,896
Reaction score
8,959
I didn't think many brokers allowed their clients to get in on IPOs unless they are accredited investors. Or are you talking about post IPO and the initial listing on secondary markets?
 
OP
OP
elindholm

elindholm

burner account
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
29,224
Reaction score
13,333
Location
L.A. area
I didn't think many brokers allowed their clients to get in on IPOs unless they are accredited investors. Or are you talking about post IPO and the initial listing on secondary markets?

No, the IPO itself. I don't know whether I would have gotten any shares or not, but there was an application process, and I passed the first screen.

This was E*Trade, i.e. Morgan Stanley, and they claim this is something they provide. (I'm in a "preferred" tier, so maybe that matters.) But, since I didn't set my price high enough, I didn't get to find out.
 
Top