Who is starting on the DLine?

CardNots

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
5,419
Reaction score
6,170
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
Oh, thank you for posting. However, since I wrote the idea, I looked a little into it. Watson injured his ACL late last season, so he might be out for much of this season. I haven’t really researched about other possibilities, but leading up to the draft I saw both Alec Pierce from the Colts and George Pickens from the Steelers being mentioned. Both fit exactly what I think the Cards need (a deep threat, big play-guy), but Pickens are allegedly a bit of a headcase. It’s just that I would like to see Ossenfort be aggressive going into the regular season. I think the team is ready to make a run, and a legit WR threat might be the missing ingredient.
I certainly wouldn’t give up a draft pick to acquire Watson especially given his injury. Why you say? Well it’s unlikely he would provide much value for this season likely starting the year on IR.

I keep focusing on those key words of “might be the missing ingredient”. I remember the same argument regarding the acquisition of Hollywood. We lost in that deal.

Not sure I’m willing to strike yet another especially for a currently injured player giving up draft capital with no chance to establish a rhythm with Kyler prior to the start of the season.
 
Last edited:

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
90,825
Reaction score
42,812
Sure wish we had gone after Jeudy in trade last year like I mentioned at the time. He had a breakout year in Cleveland, not many TD's but their QB's sucked. He's the type of guy we need has the speed and is just coming into his prime now.

Need to find this years Jeudy and get him
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,236
Reaction score
3,338
Location
Denmark
I certainly wouldn’t give up a draft pick to acquire Watson especially given his injury. Why you say? Well it’s unlikely he would provide much value for this season likely starting the year on IR.

I keep focusing on those key words of “might be the missing ingredient”. I remember the same argument regarding the acquisition of Hollywood. We lost in that deal.

Not sure I’m willing strike yet another especially for a currently injured player giving up draft capital with no chance to establish a rhythm with Kyler prior to the start of the season.
You are very right, CN. “The missing piece” is often not the missing piece, for various reasons. I think my point is that I would like to see Ossenfort at least try to go for it. I think that he did a great job all the offseason in going after players that could become stars, so why not gamble all the way? I certainly understand the view that it is better to keep your resources, and specifically with Watson, I changed my mind when I found out that he was injured, but I would just personally like to be more aggressive for one offseason.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
19,492
Reaction score
18,408
Location
Modesto, California
You are very right, CN. “The missing piece” is often not the missing piece, for various reasons. I think my point is that I would like to see Ossenfort at least try to go for it. I think that he did a great job all the offseason in going after players that could become stars, so why not gamble all the way? I certainly understand the view that it is better to keep your resources, and specifically with Watson, I changed my mind when I found out that he was injured, but I would just personally like to be more aggressive for one offseason.
I dunno...Green Bay just draft another WR early to fill his role. since we are not likely to fill that position this season anyway I wouldnt mind having to wait to see him play. Worst case scenario is we have Zay Jones' replacement on the roster already... best case is he builds a rapport with Kyler when he comes back this season and we have a legit deep threat just in time for a playoff run.
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,236
Reaction score
3,338
Location
Denmark
I dunno...Green Bay just draft another WR early to fill his role. since we are not likely to fill that position this season anyway I wouldnt mind having to wait to see him play. Worst case scenario is we have Zay Jones' replacement on the roster already... best case is he builds a rapport with Kyler when he comes back this season and we have a legit deep threat just in time for a playoff run.
Depending on what it cost, I could be talked into it.

Green Bay drafted two in the first three rounds, by the way.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
23,517
Reaction score
43,266
Location
UK
Honestly can't say.

I don't think much of Robinson. Nolen may well outplay him in camp. Really going to come down to what happens there.

Only two I can be sure of on 1st down game one are Tomlinson and Sweat.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,765
Reaction score
8,418
Someone else is mentioning Watson to the Cardinals now too.

You must be registered for see images attach



If the Cards could get GB to accept that deal, it should have happened yesterday. Murphy-Bunting has no trade value.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,765
Reaction score
8,418
Robinson is going to be a starter this year, no doubt. I think CC will honorarily start too. Tomlinson is the other starter.
Very much doubt Nolan starts until late in year but will see the field a lot and be a main contributor.
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,236
Reaction score
3,338
Location
Denmark
I don't think much of Robinson. Nolen may well outplay him in camp. Really going to come down to what happens there.
I expect them to play different positions. I think they will move Robinson to more of an edge-role. The role that made him go from an expected midround pick as a junior to a first-round pick as a senior. I expect Robinson and Nolen on the field together quite often.
 

BirdGangThing

Murd Watcher
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
19,995
Reaction score
26,278
Location
Arcadia
.
I expect them to play different positions. I think they will move Robinson to more of an edge-role. The role that made him go from an expected midround pick as a junior to a first-round pick as a senior. I expect Robinson and Nolen on the field together quite often.
i think d-rob's gonna do all his own stunts - where as cc/nolen/tomlinson will be more traditional
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,672
Reaction score
32,837
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Robinson is going to be a starter this year, no doubt.
I expect him to be by mid year, but he didn’t get much experience or have much impact last season. Considering how little actual work is available in the preseason, I don’t know how you expect him to earn a starting job.

Much more likely it stays with Zaven, who I think people are vastly underrating.
 

CardNots

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
5,419
Reaction score
6,170
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
You are very right, CN. “The missing piece” is often not the missing piece, for various reasons. I think my point is that I would like to see Ossenfort at least try to go for it. I think that he did a great job all the offseason in going after players that could become stars, so why not gamble all the way? I certainly understand the view that it is better to keep your resources, and specifically with Watson, I changed my mind when I found out that he was injured, but I would just personally like to be more aggressive for one offseason.
After watching Monti celebrate wins last year, I’m convinced he is just as much a fan of this team as we are at least at this current point in time.

I would venture a guess Monti is doing what he can to steer this team to relevance.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
17,702
Reaction score
17,022
Much more likely it stays with Zaven, who I think people are vastly underrating.
Yeah, if his role in this D is to be a great run stopper, he fills it. Not good in pass coverage or rushing the passer. Maybe he's just in on obvious run downs - having Browning to focus on getting to the QB should make for a decent rotation.
 

GeorgiaCard88

All Star
Joined
Jan 10, 2023
Posts
553
Reaction score
1,504
Location
Georgia
They are very different players, GC, and fit different roles on the defensive line. If they do let Nichols go, it would likely be for a guy like the undrafted Elijah Simmons who fits that role much better, but even though I like Simmons, that is probably unlikely to happen.
Gandhi with all due respect- I think we sometimes over micro compartmentalize the D-line position based on "technique".

At the end of the day- in my humble opinion- this defense is no worse off by letting a player like Nichols float away, even without a pound for pound equivalent to replace him. If rallis is the coordinator we believe him to be- he will infuse a much higher talent level/potential effectively than keeping a sub-par player because that player fits a certain phenotype.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,672
Reaction score
32,837
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Yeah, if his role in this D is to be a great run stopper, he fills it. Not good in pass coverage or rushing the passer. Maybe he's just in on obvious run downs - having Browning to focus on getting to the QB should make for a decent rotation.
The average NFL team had 62 offensive plays per game. Across two edge positions that’s 124 snaps per game. Plenty to go around and put each player in a position to excel.
 

HairZach

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
1,681
Reaction score
3,517
Location
VA
Sure wish we had gone after Jeudy in trade last year like I mentioned at the time. He had a breakout year in Cleveland, not many TD's but their QB's sucked. He's the type of guy we need has the speed and is just coming into his prime now.

Need to find this years Jeudy and get him
Disappointing former 1st round WR from 2019-2022 who are hitting their prime age? Guys that fit the description who would be possible to get are Kadarius Toney, N'Keal Harry, and maybe Hollywood Brown/Jahan Dotson.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
90,825
Reaction score
42,812
Disappointing former 1st round WR from 2019-2022 who are hitting their prime age? Guys that fit the description who would be possible to get are Kadarius Toney, N'Keal Harry, and maybe Hollywood Brown/Jahan Dotson.

I mean guy in his mid 20's who's just hitting his stride as a player. Not that there's a guy like Jeudy every year but the Browns traded a 5th and 6th round pick and got a guy who put up 90 catches for them at 25 years old(now 26). That's the pipe dream, every year there's a guy like that at some position, seems less common at Wr but it happens every year with OL's and DT's etc
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
23,517
Reaction score
43,266
Location
UK
I expect him to be by mid year, but he didn’t get much experience or have much impact last season. Considering how little actual work is available in the preseason, I don’t know how you expect him to earn a starting job.

Much more likely it stays with Zaven, who I think people are vastly underrating.

Yeah Zaven more likely to be the 1st down edge, which will get him the starter asterix. But might only play 1st downs TBH.
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,236
Reaction score
3,338
Location
Denmark
After watching Monti celebrate wins last year, I’m convinced he is just as much a fan of this team as we are at least at this current point in time.

I would venture a guess Monti is doing what he can to steer this team to relevance.
Oh, I am not questioning that at all. If I gave that impression, that is on me. It's just that there is obviously different ways to do it, and I think that the one I wish is different from what Ossenfort think.
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,236
Reaction score
3,338
Location
Denmark
Gandhi with all due respect- I think we sometimes over micro compartmentalize the D-line position based on "technique".

At the end of the day- in my humble opinion- this defense is no worse off by letting a player like Nichols float away, even without a pound for pound equivalent to replace him. If rallis is the coordinator we believe him to be- he will infuse a much higher talent level/potential effectively than keeping a sub-par player because that player fits a certain phenotype.
To me it is about playing style, and Nichols’ playing style is just significantly different than Stills’, partly because he is simply bigger. Size is not necessarily a requirement to play that role, but the two aspects just usually follow, so it is not that Rallis would keep the lesser talent, but simply that he needs Nichols to make his scheme work. So while you are certainly right that if the Cards had a pound-for-pound alternative to him, then the team might not be worse in letting go of Nichols, but the problem is that they don’t. That is also why I mentioned that Simmons could potentially be an alternative to Nichols. It’s about filling a role and not about general talent.

I will also note that Nichols played in six games. The sample size to write him off is very small.

I appreciate a lot that Ossenfort acquires players that fits the schemes, while Keim mostly acquired the best players he could get and then left it to the coaches to make it work.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
65,784
Reaction score
61,705
Location
SoCal
Ourlads is a little more well-regarded:

This would have been my assumption. Zay is the one if these things that’s not like the other. Really stands out as the wtf.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
642,645
Posts
5,598,569
Members
6,355
Latest member
azgreg
Top