xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
He knows who you are . . . !xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Well, he’ll “deserve” it if he produces.hung out with him at Greenskeepers at Waste Management. he was amongst a group of Kirk, Murphy, Gino Littles (their "handler"), and buncha washed college athletes...
Chase was surprised I knew his name - it was after his rookie year. He seems like a smart dude and I hope he gets PAID next year. He deserves that.
so far he's steadily improving, has stayed out of trouble and answers the media well. I would say he's showed he's a professional and deserves to get another contract (probably on the bigger half if he stays healthy)Well, he’ll “deserve” it if he produces.
were y’all throwing rocks at vans together?
Um, he's flat-out admitting he can't handle 20 carries a game. That's not a good sign when talking about his durability issues.
Um, he's flat-out admitting he can't handle 20 carries a game. That's not a good sign when talking about his durability issues.
The health of Conner is key. Chase is really good when you keep him to 12 to 15 touches a game.Um, he's flat-out admitting he can't handle 20 carries a game. That's not a good sign when talking about his durability issues.
Not to mention only Henry & Cook only averaged that many carries a game last year.The health of Conner is key. Chase is really good when you keep him to 12 to 15 touches a game.
Don’t you ever say such a thing lol. Not even close. Ellington was the most overrated player in the board’s history. What a soft ass bum. Edmonds is far better in every department.Andre Ellington part deux….. My ptsd is real folks.
Andre Ellington part deux….. My ptsd is real folks.
He did not admit that from what I read.
The health of Conner is key. Chase is really good when you keep him to 12 to 15 touches a game.
You're not the only one who's worried. We're one standard Conner high-ankle sprain from having one guy who's good for 10-15 touches a game and doesn't hold up.
When asked about doubts he can be a 20-carry back: "I may not be your typical 20-carry guy." That would be enough in and of itself, but then he goes on to say maybe he can be a 20 TOUCHES guy. If that's not admitting you aren't a 20-carry guy, I don't know what is.
And for those who aren't concerned with that, what happens if (when) Conner gets injured? Where do the carries come from? Oh, yeah, I know what the scornful, sarcastic replies will be: "Duh, some Jacksonville practice squad bum." Like, yeah, magic! It's just that easy! Like, that's why everyone in the NFL has good enough RBs. Oh wait...
Exactly the scary part of the formula. We have a guy that can be passable but in an extremely limited capacity, and we have a guy with huge injury concerns. Not good.
Dang it, just when I drag myself OUT of the RB conversation, they pull me back IN
"May or may not" is used to indicate that the point is under thought or scrutiny. It's not meant to give a clear indication that one option is more likely than the other. Given that all of two RBs averaged 20+ carries per game in 2020, I can't see much of an issue here beyond the possibility that the tandem approach at RB fails due to injury. As for his 20 touch reference, it's to my mind a simple expression of his ability to both run and catch and his understanding as to how he's likely to be used.
You're not the only one who's worried. We're one standard Conner high-ankle sprain from having one guy who's good for 10-15 touches a game and doesn't hold up.
When asked about doubts he can be a 20-carry back: "I may not be your typical 20-carry guy." That would be enough in and of itself, but then he goes on to say maybe he can be a 20 TOUCHES guy. If that's not admitting you aren't a 20-carry guy, I don't know what is.
And for those who aren't concerned with that, what happens if (when) Conner gets injured? Where do the carries come from? Oh, yeah, I know what the scornful, sarcastic replies will be: "Duh, some Jacksonville practice squad bum." Like, yeah, magic! It's just that easy! Like, that's why everyone in the NFL has good enough RBs. Oh wait...
Exactly the scary part of the formula. We have a guy that can be passable but in an extremely limited capacity, and we have a guy with huge injury concerns. Not good.
Dang it, just when I drag myself OUT of the RB conversation, they pull me back IN
Football 101: running the football is more about the offensive line than the running back .
Football 100: You still actually have to have a serviceable running back.
See, here's the scornful reply I was expecting. Krang is 100 percent cool if we lose Conner for a long stretch and have nothing but Edmonds because just any old RB will do, duh!
Again, Krang, if any old RB will do, why isn't every NFL team set at the position? I know what your answer will be! Because they don't have good OLs, right? Circular logic at its finest.