What was the point in making Bradford inactive?

phillycard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
8,277
Reaction score
6,410
Location
The 215
We're already seeing that some of Wilk's in game moves are dumbfounding. I'm just curious as to the thinking of putting SB behind Glennon. I don't see a lot of movement on depth charts with backups. Usually the 2nd stays the 2nd and so on. Someone please give me some clarity to this because as I see it this was a psuedo tough guy move meant to "send a message" which was in my opinion laughable and only makes him look more incompetent in light of yesterdays L.
 
OP
OP
phillycard

phillycard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
8,277
Reaction score
6,410
Location
The 215
If he’s not starting why not save 350,000 per game... This is actually a smart move.
Understood. I did see something about Bradford losing money by not playing. Makes sense I guess.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
70,815
Reaction score
69,767
Location
SoCal
Understood. I did see something about Bradford losing money by not playing. Makes sense I guess.
It’s not just him losing money. I’ve seen that cards can recoup something like $4M in cap space and push it to next year. If that’s true Bradford should not dress the rest of the year. I don’t feel bad taking that $ outta his hands considering he’s still making $15M for less than three games played this year and he got to avoid injury.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,595
Reaction score
7,018
Location
Dallas, TX
Should’ve just cut him just like I said after the team was turned over to the kid last week!
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
1,448,691
Posts
6,684,732
Members
6,435
Latest member
taylor_fancav
Top