Brighteyes
Super Bowl!
4 Arizona Defensive Backs in the top 28 -- and the number 1 guy is Duane Starks.
http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/playerrankings/regularseason/DB
http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/playerrankings/regularseason/DB
TOP DB's WEEK 1
- Thread starter Brighteyes
- Start date
OP
OP
Brighteyes
Super Bowl!
No other team, by the way, has 4 DBs in the top 30.
Clif
ASFN Addict
I dont know if that is a blessing or a curse.
I don't think it's necessarily a curse due to the team that we played.
However, having said that, it's not normally a good sign when your DB's are the leading tacklers on the team.
You would expect that that should be linebackers.
DB tackles generally equate with a lot of receptions and/or holes in the "front 7" on running plays...neither of which are something to be proud of.
However, having said that, it's not normally a good sign when your DB's are the leading tacklers on the team.
You would expect that that should be linebackers.
DB tackles generally equate with a lot of receptions and/or holes in the "front 7" on running plays...neither of which are something to be proud of.
Pariah
H.S.
Does anyone else think there might be law in this system when a CB like Champ Bailey (who happens to be featured in the intro paragraph) is last on the list? That guy almost single-handedly shut down the Chiefs' offense by making Gonz a non-factor.
Jetstream Green
Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Sometimes are CBs look worse than suggested
Why? We still have no freaking pass rush. The DL guys can't stop the run either so our safeties have to move forward screwing them even more if it does turn out to be a pass. UHGGGG!!!
Why? We still have no freaking pass rush. The DL guys can't stop the run either so our safeties have to move forward screwing them even more if it does turn out to be a pass. UHGGGG!!!
Jttsaz
#40 Never Forget
Fitz comes in at 29...top 30 WR not bad!
BuckeyeCardinal
Cantankerous Curmudgeon
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2003
- Posts
- 2,252
- Reaction score
- 0
abomb said:Hmmm...not sure if this is a good thing. Is it really good that our secondary had the most tackles and such in the NFL?
A-Bomb
That's what I was thinkin.
Why did we have 18 solos from the CB position?
Seems kinda high don't ya think?
Was in the Ram offense?
Was it that our linebackers weren't helpin out?
Was it that our middle was so strong that they ran outside?
BuckeyeCardinal said:
Against an offense that throws every down your DBs are going to have more tackles and against a team that runs everydown your LBs will have more tackles. If we were playing an offense like Baltimores and our DBs had more tackles, that would be bad.
I do not understand this ranking system. What detrmines who is #1 Michael Lewis had more tackles and solo's than Starks and he is #3, Donnie Abraham fior the Jest had 5 tackles an INT, a FF a Sack and a TD and he was listed at #60. This is pretty stupid.
