The Collin Gillespie Bandwagon Thread

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,595
Reaction score
73,890
By having his early-bird rights as well, this allows Gillepsie to sign and not affect the cap space, allowing them to go over the limit with his deal. That should make fans feel comfortable about the Suns’ salary issues with Jordan Goodwin and Mark Williams as free agents, too.



JMHO, but I think all the salaries count towards the cap. Hopefully I'm wrong.

This is from Bobby Marks of ESPN:

Bobby Marks Apr 28, 2026, 12:20 AM ET

Because he signed two contracts with the Suns (a two-way in 2024-25 and his current one-year deal), Gillespie can sign for up to four seasons and a $14.9 million starting salary. The contract must be for a minimum of two seasons and cannot include an option.


 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,741
Reaction score
5,508
Location
Harrisburg, PA
I think it was just poor and confusing wording. I think he was trying to say that they can go over the cap to sign him because they have the early Bird rights. You don't need the cap space to sign him like you would if he were a random free agent, but because it's not full Bird right, they can only pay him so much (League average, if I remember correctly.)
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,595
Reaction score
73,890
On Sports360AZ, Gerald Bourguet writes a free to read article about what it will take to re-sign Collin Gillespie.

Below is a snippet:


By Gerald Bourguet, Sports360AZ, Posted May 6, 2026 at 2:05 pm

Remember, the Suns are only operating with $14.8 million of space beneath that luxury tax line. Re-signing Gillespie and Goodwin and then filling out their two remaining roster spots would likely be enough to push Phoenix back into tax territory.



 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
22,460
Reaction score
15,125
On Sports360AZ, Gerald Bourguet writes a free to read article about what it will take to re-sign Collin Gillespie.

Below is a snippet:


By Gerald Bourguet, Sports360AZ, Posted May 6, 2026 at 2:05 pm

Remember, the Suns are only operating with $14.8 million of space beneath that luxury tax line. Re-signing Gillespie and Goodwin and then filling out their two remaining roster spots would likely be enough to push Phoenix back into tax territory.




I would be extremely surprised if, both, Allen and O'Neale, are on next season. I would be less surprised if neither are still here than both. For sure, one is gone. That clears up enough money that keeping Colin and Goodwin we'd be below the tax... different story if Williams is kept. But, I am not concerned if we're over the tax. Ishbia says he has no fear of it and if he is willing to pay, fine. We just need to steer clear of the aprons.

I'd also be surprised if we didn't use the MLE to bring in help up front, especially if Williams is not kept.

I think we're going to sniff around on Green and find no takers. He isn't hopeless, but he needs to make a big leap to be worth that contract.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,595
Reaction score
73,890
I would be extremely surprised if, both, Allen and O'Neale, are on next season. I would be less surprised if neither are still here than both. For sure, one is gone. That clears up enough money that keeping Colin and Goodwin we'd be below the tax... different story if Williams is kept. But, I am not concerned if we're over the tax. Ishbia says he has no fear of it and if he is willing to pay, fine. We just need to steer clear of the aprons.

I'd also be surprised if we didn't use the MLE to bring in help up front, especially if Williams is not kept.

I think we're going to sniff around on Green and find no takers. He isn't hopeless, but he needs to make a big leap to be worth that contract.

The thing on both Allen and O'Neale, although their contracts are not excessive, a contender might not want to take on their salaries in trade.

Losing those two first round picks used to acquire Williams to add as potential sweeteners in a trade really hurts. The Suns are going to have to shed salaries somewhere if they are to keep Gillespie and Goodwin.

The Suns definitely need to strengthen their front court with or without Williams.

On draft day, the Suns do have two first round picks available to use in trade, but I don't like to even think about it.

On paying the luxury tax, it's not just about paying the tax, but the penalties for being a repeat offender.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
24,401
Reaction score
21,240
Location
Your Head, Rent Free
I don't think Ishbia cares about the repeat tax offender penalties. It's the second apron penalties that he doesn't want to get into. Tax repeater penalties mean as much to Ishbia as an extra cup of coffee from a local coffee shop means to me.

He doesn't mind paying it but he aims to avoid the repeater tax that pushes pick to the end of the round. He needs to make it out of the tax every 3 years for that. That's why it was a big deal to get out this year.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
22,460
Reaction score
15,125
He doesn't mind paying it but he aims to avoid the repeater tax that pushes pick to the end of the round. He needs to make it out of the tax every 3 years for that. That's why it was a big deal to get out this year.

Yeah, but we have 3 years to get back below it now. I don't see that being hard.

Allen and O'Neale's contracts are tradable, Green and Brooks will either expire or be shipped off.

Avoid the aprons, we're already hamstrung as it is. If Ishbia wants to pay the tax, which he says he's fine with, that is great.
 

95pro

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 10, 2007
Posts
14,989
Reaction score
5,923
It is a shame we decided to keep paying Beal another 4 years (including 25-26) while we could have hung on to him longer to reduce our sentence in the long run.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,741
Reaction score
5,508
Location
Harrisburg, PA
He doesn't mind paying it but he aims to avoid the repeater tax that pushes pick to the end of the round. He needs to make it out of the tax every 3 years for that. That's why it was a big deal to get out this year.

Isn't that a second-apron repeat offender penalty? I don't think paying a tax triggers picks being frozen.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
133,595
Reaction score
73,890
Gerald Bourguet on podcast speculates on the interest and salary range for Collin Gillespie.

Perhaps $11-13 million a season?

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Adrian

Ronin forever
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
171,264
Reaction score
83,960
Location
Crowley, TX
Not likely to happen, but I don’t blame him, I wish he would take less to stay.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
97,728
Reaction score
82,877
It is a shame we decided to keep paying Beal another 4 years (including 25-26) while we could have hung on to him longer to reduce our sentence in the long run.
Yeah… that didn’t make much sense.

Although does not having his full salary help us this offseason be able to resign Goody and Colin?
 
Top